J.L. Sanchez Lozano , D.J. Rojas Lesmes , E.G. Romero Bustamante , R.C. Hales , E.J. Nelson , G.P. Williams , D.P. Ames , N.L. Jones , A.L. Gutierrez , C. Cardona Almeida
{"title":"GEOGLOWS ECMWF 溪流水文模型的历史模拟性能评估和月流量持续时间曲线量化绘图 (MFDC-QM)","authors":"J.L. Sanchez Lozano , D.J. Rojas Lesmes , E.G. Romero Bustamante , R.C. Hales , E.J. Nelson , G.P. Williams , D.P. Ames , N.L. Jones , A.L. Gutierrez , C. Cardona Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global hydrological models are essential for managing water resources and predicting hydrological events. However, the local-scale usability of global models challenges big-data management, communication, adoption, and validation. Validation is the biggest challenge bercause of the need for large-scale data management and model calibration, which requires extensive and often inaccessible observed data. This study assesses the GEOGLOWS-ECMWF Global Hydrologic Model, revealing systematic biases that impact its accuracy. We propose a bias-correction methodology using flow duration curves to align non-exceedance probabilities of simulated and observed streamflow, significantly improving the GEOGLOWS model. Unfortunately, this approach does not inherently improve simulations in ungauged locations. The methodology not only enhances the GEOGLOWS model's accuracy but also stands as a versatile solution applicable across various hydrological models. This bias correction approach provides a tool for improving hydrological predictions and gives users the confidence to use global models for local water resource management and decision-making processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 106235"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical simulation performance evaluation and monthly flow duration curve quantile-mapping (MFDC-QM) of the GEOGLOWS ECMWF streamflow hydrologic model\",\"authors\":\"J.L. Sanchez Lozano , D.J. Rojas Lesmes , E.G. Romero Bustamante , R.C. Hales , E.J. Nelson , G.P. Williams , D.P. Ames , N.L. Jones , A.L. Gutierrez , C. Cardona Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Global hydrological models are essential for managing water resources and predicting hydrological events. However, the local-scale usability of global models challenges big-data management, communication, adoption, and validation. Validation is the biggest challenge bercause of the need for large-scale data management and model calibration, which requires extensive and often inaccessible observed data. This study assesses the GEOGLOWS-ECMWF Global Hydrologic Model, revealing systematic biases that impact its accuracy. We propose a bias-correction methodology using flow duration curves to align non-exceedance probabilities of simulated and observed streamflow, significantly improving the GEOGLOWS model. Unfortunately, this approach does not inherently improve simulations in ungauged locations. The methodology not only enhances the GEOGLOWS model's accuracy but also stands as a versatile solution applicable across various hydrological models. This bias correction approach provides a tool for improving hydrological predictions and gives users the confidence to use global models for local water resource management and decision-making processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Modelling & Software\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Modelling & Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815224002962\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815224002962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Historical simulation performance evaluation and monthly flow duration curve quantile-mapping (MFDC-QM) of the GEOGLOWS ECMWF streamflow hydrologic model
Global hydrological models are essential for managing water resources and predicting hydrological events. However, the local-scale usability of global models challenges big-data management, communication, adoption, and validation. Validation is the biggest challenge bercause of the need for large-scale data management and model calibration, which requires extensive and often inaccessible observed data. This study assesses the GEOGLOWS-ECMWF Global Hydrologic Model, revealing systematic biases that impact its accuracy. We propose a bias-correction methodology using flow duration curves to align non-exceedance probabilities of simulated and observed streamflow, significantly improving the GEOGLOWS model. Unfortunately, this approach does not inherently improve simulations in ungauged locations. The methodology not only enhances the GEOGLOWS model's accuracy but also stands as a versatile solution applicable across various hydrological models. This bias correction approach provides a tool for improving hydrological predictions and gives users the confidence to use global models for local water resource management and decision-making processes.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.