Alfredo Pedroza-Díaz , Pedro M. Rodrigo , Óscar Dávalos-Orozco , Eduardo De-la-Vega , Álvaro Valera-Albacete
{"title":"光伏电池电气特性的显式模型综述","authors":"Alfredo Pedroza-Díaz , Pedro M. Rodrigo , Óscar Dávalos-Orozco , Eduardo De-la-Vega , Álvaro Valera-Albacete","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For modeling solar cells, the single diode model presents difficulties in implementation and is expensive computationally because it involves a transcendental and implicit mathematical equation. Some authors have proposed explicit, easy-to-use, and computationally efficient models that approximate its behavior. It is challenging to select the proper model for each specific application because the different proposals were tested for different solar panels, operating conditions, and performance metrics, and, therefore, a direct comparison based on the published information is not possible. In this study, the existing explicit models are reviewed, presenting their equations and discussing their mathematical approximations. Four new models are introduced, and a classification of models is proposed. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of all the models under many photovoltaic technologies and operating conditions is carried out using the same performance metrics and parameter extraction method. This allows developing a framework that makes the selection of models easier for each application. The comparative results show that three models proposed by the research team are more accurate than the implicit approach, with average root mean squared errors as low as 0.41 % (versus 0.54 % error of the implicit model). However, the parameters in these models lack physical sense. Among the explicit models incorporating physical parameters and formulated with elementary functions, the most accurate is based on a first order Padé approximation (0.55 % error). The ranking of models is expected to become a valuable tool for the photovoltaic community in various solar cell modeling tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"207 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of explicit models for photovoltaic cell electrical characterization\",\"authors\":\"Alfredo Pedroza-Díaz , Pedro M. Rodrigo , Óscar Dávalos-Orozco , Eduardo De-la-Vega , Álvaro Valera-Albacete\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>For modeling solar cells, the single diode model presents difficulties in implementation and is expensive computationally because it involves a transcendental and implicit mathematical equation. Some authors have proposed explicit, easy-to-use, and computationally efficient models that approximate its behavior. It is challenging to select the proper model for each specific application because the different proposals were tested for different solar panels, operating conditions, and performance metrics, and, therefore, a direct comparison based on the published information is not possible. In this study, the existing explicit models are reviewed, presenting their equations and discussing their mathematical approximations. Four new models are introduced, and a classification of models is proposed. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of all the models under many photovoltaic technologies and operating conditions is carried out using the same performance metrics and parameter extraction method. This allows developing a framework that makes the selection of models easier for each application. The comparative results show that three models proposed by the research team are more accurate than the implicit approach, with average root mean squared errors as low as 0.41 % (versus 0.54 % error of the implicit model). However, the parameters in these models lack physical sense. Among the explicit models incorporating physical parameters and formulated with elementary functions, the most accurate is based on a first order Padé approximation (0.55 % error). The ranking of models is expected to become a valuable tool for the photovoltaic community in various solar cell modeling tasks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007056\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of explicit models for photovoltaic cell electrical characterization
For modeling solar cells, the single diode model presents difficulties in implementation and is expensive computationally because it involves a transcendental and implicit mathematical equation. Some authors have proposed explicit, easy-to-use, and computationally efficient models that approximate its behavior. It is challenging to select the proper model for each specific application because the different proposals were tested for different solar panels, operating conditions, and performance metrics, and, therefore, a direct comparison based on the published information is not possible. In this study, the existing explicit models are reviewed, presenting their equations and discussing their mathematical approximations. Four new models are introduced, and a classification of models is proposed. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of all the models under many photovoltaic technologies and operating conditions is carried out using the same performance metrics and parameter extraction method. This allows developing a framework that makes the selection of models easier for each application. The comparative results show that three models proposed by the research team are more accurate than the implicit approach, with average root mean squared errors as low as 0.41 % (versus 0.54 % error of the implicit model). However, the parameters in these models lack physical sense. Among the explicit models incorporating physical parameters and formulated with elementary functions, the most accurate is based on a first order Padé approximation (0.55 % error). The ranking of models is expected to become a valuable tool for the photovoltaic community in various solar cell modeling tasks.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.