太阳能地球工程的全球视角:分析研究以实现有效、包容和公正治理的新框架

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zachary Dove , Arien Hernandez , Shuchi Talati , Sikina Jinnah
{"title":"太阳能地球工程的全球视角:分析研究以实现有效、包容和公正治理的新框架","authors":"Zachary Dove ,&nbsp;Arien Hernandez ,&nbsp;Shuchi Talati ,&nbsp;Sikina Jinnah","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We present a novel analytical framework to evaluate the ethical, political, and justice implications of research on perceptions of emerging technologies. Using the literature on perspectives on solar geoengineering (SG) as an object of study, we develop a framework that interrogates the research process itself. Our framework interrogates whose perceptions are being studied, by whom, using what methods, following which lines of inquiry, and crucially, for what purposes. We do this through the case of SG, a controversial emerging climate intervention technology with potential global social and environmental impacts. We find that SG perspectives research raises important political and justice concerns related to whose perspectives are being studied and for what purposes. We show that SG perspectives research centers the perspectives from the Global North, underrepresents youth perspectives, and that some research aims to increase public support for SG. Ours is the first study to aggregate and quantify this rich empirical data to enable us to visualize these inequities. We also find that investigations of support for SG dominate the literature at the neglect of other important lines of inquiry, such as how cross-cultural perspectives on public engagement and capacity building can inform efforts to institutionalize the inclusion of youth and the Global South in SG discussions. We further find widespread motivation to inform decision-making but without clear direction about how best to do so. We chart a pathway for future perspectives research on SG and broader climate interventions, centered around four recommendations that seek to ameliorate some of these limitations and enhance the potential for perspectives research to enable more effective, inclusive, and just solar geoengineering governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global perspectives on solar geoengineering: A novel framework for analyzing research in pursuit of effective, inclusive, and just governance\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Dove ,&nbsp;Arien Hernandez ,&nbsp;Shuchi Talati ,&nbsp;Sikina Jinnah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We present a novel analytical framework to evaluate the ethical, political, and justice implications of research on perceptions of emerging technologies. Using the literature on perspectives on solar geoengineering (SG) as an object of study, we develop a framework that interrogates the research process itself. Our framework interrogates whose perceptions are being studied, by whom, using what methods, following which lines of inquiry, and crucially, for what purposes. We do this through the case of SG, a controversial emerging climate intervention technology with potential global social and environmental impacts. We find that SG perspectives research raises important political and justice concerns related to whose perspectives are being studied and for what purposes. We show that SG perspectives research centers the perspectives from the Global North, underrepresents youth perspectives, and that some research aims to increase public support for SG. Ours is the first study to aggregate and quantify this rich empirical data to enable us to visualize these inequities. We also find that investigations of support for SG dominate the literature at the neglect of other important lines of inquiry, such as how cross-cultural perspectives on public engagement and capacity building can inform efforts to institutionalize the inclusion of youth and the Global South in SG discussions. We further find widespread motivation to inform decision-making but without clear direction about how best to do so. We chart a pathway for future perspectives research on SG and broader climate interventions, centered around four recommendations that seek to ameliorate some of these limitations and enhance the potential for perspectives research to enable more effective, inclusive, and just solar geoengineering governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003700\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一个新颖的分析框架,用于评估新兴技术认知研究的伦理、政治和正义影响。我们以有关太阳能地球工程(SG)观点的文献为研究对象,建立了一个框架来审视研究过程本身。我们的框架探讨了由谁、使用什么方法、按照什么思路以及关键的是出于什么目的对谁的看法进行研究。我们以 SG 为例进行研究,SG 是一种有争议的新兴气候干预技术,具有潜在的全球社会和环境影响。我们发现,SG 视角研究提出了重要的政治和公正问题,涉及到研究谁的视角和出于什么目的。我们发现,SG 观点研究以全球北方国家的观点为中心,对青年观点的代表不足,而且有些研究旨在增加公众对 SG 的支持。我们的研究首次汇总并量化了这些丰富的经验数据,使我们能够直观地看到这些不平等现象。我们还发现,有关支持秘书长的研究在文献中占主导地位,却忽视了其他重要的研究方向,例如,有关公众参与和能力建设的跨文化视角如何为将青年和全球南部地区纳入秘书长讨论的制度化工作提供信息。我们还发现,人们普遍有为决策提供信息的动机,但对于如何最好地做到这一点却没有明确的方向。我们为未来有关太阳能发电和更广泛的气候干预的视角研究描绘了一条道路,围绕着四项建议,力图改善其中的一些局限性,并提高视角研究的潜力,使太阳能地球工程治理更加有效、包容和公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global perspectives on solar geoengineering: A novel framework for analyzing research in pursuit of effective, inclusive, and just governance
We present a novel analytical framework to evaluate the ethical, political, and justice implications of research on perceptions of emerging technologies. Using the literature on perspectives on solar geoengineering (SG) as an object of study, we develop a framework that interrogates the research process itself. Our framework interrogates whose perceptions are being studied, by whom, using what methods, following which lines of inquiry, and crucially, for what purposes. We do this through the case of SG, a controversial emerging climate intervention technology with potential global social and environmental impacts. We find that SG perspectives research raises important political and justice concerns related to whose perspectives are being studied and for what purposes. We show that SG perspectives research centers the perspectives from the Global North, underrepresents youth perspectives, and that some research aims to increase public support for SG. Ours is the first study to aggregate and quantify this rich empirical data to enable us to visualize these inequities. We also find that investigations of support for SG dominate the literature at the neglect of other important lines of inquiry, such as how cross-cultural perspectives on public engagement and capacity building can inform efforts to institutionalize the inclusion of youth and the Global South in SG discussions. We further find widespread motivation to inform decision-making but without clear direction about how best to do so. We chart a pathway for future perspectives research on SG and broader climate interventions, centered around four recommendations that seek to ameliorate some of these limitations and enhance the potential for perspectives research to enable more effective, inclusive, and just solar geoengineering governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信