工业中心和集群的去碳化:建立绿色工业政策综合框架

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Soyoung Oh , Mohammed Al-Juaied
{"title":"工业中心和集群的去碳化:建立绿色工业政策综合框架","authors":"Soyoung Oh ,&nbsp;Mohammed Al-Juaied","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This perspective aims to enhance understanding of industrial decarbonization strategies (e.g., carbon capture, utilization, and storage [CCUS] and hydrogen) at industrial hubs. We provide a comparative analysis of policy landscapes for the three different net-zero industrial hub projects and conclude by proposing considerations for designing green industrial policies for other regions that need deep decarbonization for their ‘hard-to-abate’ sectors.</div><div>Our case studies highlight the importance of carbon pricing mechanisms to crowd in private investments, thus providing strong signals for structural change to different stakeholders across the value chain. As industrial decarbonization, however, faces unique challenges due to its complex value chain and the need for supportive infrastructure, such as CO<sub>2</sub> transport and storage, government support for the infrastructure is essential to complement the private sector's efforts in the early stages. Over time, increasing carbon prices and phasing out free allowances can further incentivize the deployment of CCUS and hydrogen in the industry sector. For countries where raising carbon prices is politically difficult, policies designed to smooth the transition, such as carbon contracts for difference, offer a viable alternative. A well-designed mix of demand-pull and supply-push policy instruments is therefore crucial for achieving industrial decarbonization, taking into account each country's existing domestic assets, financial capacity, and geography (i.e., carbon storage capacity).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decarbonizing industrial hubs and clusters: Towards an integrated framework of green industrial policies\",\"authors\":\"Soyoung Oh ,&nbsp;Mohammed Al-Juaied\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This perspective aims to enhance understanding of industrial decarbonization strategies (e.g., carbon capture, utilization, and storage [CCUS] and hydrogen) at industrial hubs. We provide a comparative analysis of policy landscapes for the three different net-zero industrial hub projects and conclude by proposing considerations for designing green industrial policies for other regions that need deep decarbonization for their ‘hard-to-abate’ sectors.</div><div>Our case studies highlight the importance of carbon pricing mechanisms to crowd in private investments, thus providing strong signals for structural change to different stakeholders across the value chain. As industrial decarbonization, however, faces unique challenges due to its complex value chain and the need for supportive infrastructure, such as CO<sub>2</sub> transport and storage, government support for the infrastructure is essential to complement the private sector's efforts in the early stages. Over time, increasing carbon prices and phasing out free allowances can further incentivize the deployment of CCUS and hydrogen in the industry sector. For countries where raising carbon prices is politically difficult, policies designed to smooth the transition, such as carbon contracts for difference, offer a viable alternative. A well-designed mix of demand-pull and supply-push policy instruments is therefore crucial for achieving industrial decarbonization, taking into account each country's existing domestic assets, financial capacity, and geography (i.e., carbon storage capacity).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003682\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一视角旨在加深对工业中心的工业脱碳战略(如碳捕获、利用和储存[CCUS]以及氢)的理解。我们对三个不同的净零排放工业中心项目的政策环境进行了比较分析,最后提出了为其他地区设计绿色工业政策的考虑因素,这些地区的 "难消减 "部门需要深度去碳化。我们的案例研究强调了碳定价机制对于吸引私人投资的重要性,从而为整个价值链上的不同利益相关者提供了结构变革的强烈信号。然而,工业去碳化因其复杂的价值链和对二氧化碳运输和储存等辅助基础设施的需求而面临独特的挑战,因此政府对基础设施的支持对于补充私营部门在早期阶段的努力至关重要。随着时间的推移,提高碳价格和逐步取消免费配额可以进一步激励工业部门部署 CCUS 和氢能。对于在政治上难以提高碳价格的国家,旨在平稳过渡的政策,如碳差价合同,提供了一个可行的替代方案。因此,考虑到每个国家现有的国内资产、财政能力和地理条件(即碳储存能力),精心设计需求拉动型和供应推动型政策工具组合对于实现工业脱碳至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decarbonizing industrial hubs and clusters: Towards an integrated framework of green industrial policies
This perspective aims to enhance understanding of industrial decarbonization strategies (e.g., carbon capture, utilization, and storage [CCUS] and hydrogen) at industrial hubs. We provide a comparative analysis of policy landscapes for the three different net-zero industrial hub projects and conclude by proposing considerations for designing green industrial policies for other regions that need deep decarbonization for their ‘hard-to-abate’ sectors.
Our case studies highlight the importance of carbon pricing mechanisms to crowd in private investments, thus providing strong signals for structural change to different stakeholders across the value chain. As industrial decarbonization, however, faces unique challenges due to its complex value chain and the need for supportive infrastructure, such as CO2 transport and storage, government support for the infrastructure is essential to complement the private sector's efforts in the early stages. Over time, increasing carbon prices and phasing out free allowances can further incentivize the deployment of CCUS and hydrogen in the industry sector. For countries where raising carbon prices is politically difficult, policies designed to smooth the transition, such as carbon contracts for difference, offer a viable alternative. A well-designed mix of demand-pull and supply-push policy instruments is therefore crucial for achieving industrial decarbonization, taking into account each country's existing domestic assets, financial capacity, and geography (i.e., carbon storage capacity).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信