Yashwanth Arcot , Minchen Mu , Monica Iepure , Rae Karell Yodong , Wentao Zhou , Younjin Min , Luis Cisneros-Zevallos , Mustafa E.S. Akbulut
{"title":"纳米农药表面化学性质对植物角质层和蜡层吸附的影响:ZETA电位和润湿的作用","authors":"Yashwanth Arcot , Minchen Mu , Monica Iepure , Rae Karell Yodong , Wentao Zhou , Younjin Min , Luis Cisneros-Zevallos , Mustafa E.S. Akbulut","doi":"10.1016/j.surfin.2024.105190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nanopesticidal adsorption on plant surfaces is a critical determinant of their application efficacy, persistence, and ecological impact. In this study, we systematically investigate the impact of surface chemistry on the attachment of nanopesticides for seven different nanocarriers: ethyl lauroyl arginate (ELA, cationic), cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB, zwitterionic), tween 80 (TW80, nonionic), β-cyclodextrin (βCD), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, anionic), whey protein isolate (WPI), and poloxamer 407 (PXL, nonionic). Azadirachtin from neem seed extract was employed as a model pesticide active ingredient. The nanopesticides were characterized using dynamic light scattering, UV–visible spectroscopy, static contact angle (SCA, θ), and zeta (<em>ζ</em>) potential measurements. Pepper leaves (ζ = −11.6 mV) and candelilla wax (ζ = −2.6 mV) films were utilized to analyze the effect of nanocarrier chemical composition on nanopesticide adsorption. Fluorescence microscopy was utilized to quantify the adsorption of nanopesticides (with fluorophore tagging) on the substrates. It was found that the choice of nanocarrier significantly influenced the adsorption behavior. Nanopesticides with ELA corona, which was cationic with a zeta potential of ∼+19 mV and θ of ∼ 61°, exhibited the highest affinity towards the leaf cuticle and wax substrates, attributed to favorable electrostatic interactions forces. Conversely, nanopesticides with SDS (ζ = −48 mV; θ = 45°), WPI (ζ = −24 mV; θ = 54°), and PXL (ζ = −31 mV; θ = 64°) corona demonstrated the least adsorption. These findings indicate a weak correlation between the wetting behavior of nanopesticide suspensions and nanopesticide adsorption on plant and wax surfaces, as well as a strong correlation between nanopesticide zeta potential and nanopesticide adsorption. These findings heuristically recommend that aqueous cationic and zwitterionic nanocarriers for pesticides provide superior adsorption characteristics on pepper leaves and candelilla wax surfaces. Aqueous macromolecular carriers such as PXL and WPI have performed less effectively in adherence compared to shorter chain amphiphiles with similar zeta potential and wetting characteristics, indicating that the steric and osmotic chain effects of hydrophilic macromolecules hinder the adsorption relative to shorter chains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22081,"journal":{"name":"Surfaces and Interfaces","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 105190"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of nanopesticide surface chemistry on adsorption to plant cuticle and wax layer: The role of zeta potential and wetting\",\"authors\":\"Yashwanth Arcot , Minchen Mu , Monica Iepure , Rae Karell Yodong , Wentao Zhou , Younjin Min , Luis Cisneros-Zevallos , Mustafa E.S. Akbulut\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surfin.2024.105190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nanopesticidal adsorption on plant surfaces is a critical determinant of their application efficacy, persistence, and ecological impact. In this study, we systematically investigate the impact of surface chemistry on the attachment of nanopesticides for seven different nanocarriers: ethyl lauroyl arginate (ELA, cationic), cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB, zwitterionic), tween 80 (TW80, nonionic), β-cyclodextrin (βCD), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, anionic), whey protein isolate (WPI), and poloxamer 407 (PXL, nonionic). Azadirachtin from neem seed extract was employed as a model pesticide active ingredient. The nanopesticides were characterized using dynamic light scattering, UV–visible spectroscopy, static contact angle (SCA, θ), and zeta (<em>ζ</em>) potential measurements. Pepper leaves (ζ = −11.6 mV) and candelilla wax (ζ = −2.6 mV) films were utilized to analyze the effect of nanocarrier chemical composition on nanopesticide adsorption. Fluorescence microscopy was utilized to quantify the adsorption of nanopesticides (with fluorophore tagging) on the substrates. It was found that the choice of nanocarrier significantly influenced the adsorption behavior. Nanopesticides with ELA corona, which was cationic with a zeta potential of ∼+19 mV and θ of ∼ 61°, exhibited the highest affinity towards the leaf cuticle and wax substrates, attributed to favorable electrostatic interactions forces. Conversely, nanopesticides with SDS (ζ = −48 mV; θ = 45°), WPI (ζ = −24 mV; θ = 54°), and PXL (ζ = −31 mV; θ = 64°) corona demonstrated the least adsorption. These findings indicate a weak correlation between the wetting behavior of nanopesticide suspensions and nanopesticide adsorption on plant and wax surfaces, as well as a strong correlation between nanopesticide zeta potential and nanopesticide adsorption. These findings heuristically recommend that aqueous cationic and zwitterionic nanocarriers for pesticides provide superior adsorption characteristics on pepper leaves and candelilla wax surfaces. Aqueous macromolecular carriers such as PXL and WPI have performed less effectively in adherence compared to shorter chain amphiphiles with similar zeta potential and wetting characteristics, indicating that the steric and osmotic chain effects of hydrophilic macromolecules hinder the adsorption relative to shorter chains.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surfaces and Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surfaces and Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468023024013464\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surfaces and Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468023024013464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of nanopesticide surface chemistry on adsorption to plant cuticle and wax layer: The role of zeta potential and wetting
Nanopesticidal adsorption on plant surfaces is a critical determinant of their application efficacy, persistence, and ecological impact. In this study, we systematically investigate the impact of surface chemistry on the attachment of nanopesticides for seven different nanocarriers: ethyl lauroyl arginate (ELA, cationic), cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB, zwitterionic), tween 80 (TW80, nonionic), β-cyclodextrin (βCD), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, anionic), whey protein isolate (WPI), and poloxamer 407 (PXL, nonionic). Azadirachtin from neem seed extract was employed as a model pesticide active ingredient. The nanopesticides were characterized using dynamic light scattering, UV–visible spectroscopy, static contact angle (SCA, θ), and zeta (ζ) potential measurements. Pepper leaves (ζ = −11.6 mV) and candelilla wax (ζ = −2.6 mV) films were utilized to analyze the effect of nanocarrier chemical composition on nanopesticide adsorption. Fluorescence microscopy was utilized to quantify the adsorption of nanopesticides (with fluorophore tagging) on the substrates. It was found that the choice of nanocarrier significantly influenced the adsorption behavior. Nanopesticides with ELA corona, which was cationic with a zeta potential of ∼+19 mV and θ of ∼ 61°, exhibited the highest affinity towards the leaf cuticle and wax substrates, attributed to favorable electrostatic interactions forces. Conversely, nanopesticides with SDS (ζ = −48 mV; θ = 45°), WPI (ζ = −24 mV; θ = 54°), and PXL (ζ = −31 mV; θ = 64°) corona demonstrated the least adsorption. These findings indicate a weak correlation between the wetting behavior of nanopesticide suspensions and nanopesticide adsorption on plant and wax surfaces, as well as a strong correlation between nanopesticide zeta potential and nanopesticide adsorption. These findings heuristically recommend that aqueous cationic and zwitterionic nanocarriers for pesticides provide superior adsorption characteristics on pepper leaves and candelilla wax surfaces. Aqueous macromolecular carriers such as PXL and WPI have performed less effectively in adherence compared to shorter chain amphiphiles with similar zeta potential and wetting characteristics, indicating that the steric and osmotic chain effects of hydrophilic macromolecules hinder the adsorption relative to shorter chains.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a respectful outlet for ''sound science'' papers in all research areas on surfaces and interfaces. We define sound science papers as papers that describe new and well-executed research, but that do not necessarily provide brand new insights or are merely a description of research results.
Surfaces and Interfaces publishes research papers in all fields of surface science which may not always find the right home on first submission to our Elsevier sister journals (Applied Surface, Surface and Coatings Technology, Thin Solid Films)