为复苏团队开发和测试针对复苏的组织文化衡量标准

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sara C. Handley , Ingrid M. Nembhard , Cecelia L. Corson , Molly Passarella , Charlotte Cecarelli , Henry C. Lee , Jennifer Cohen , John Chuo , Jennifer Tioseco , Christopher P. Bonafide , Elizabeth E. Foglia
{"title":"为复苏团队开发和测试针对复苏的组织文化衡量标准","authors":"Sara C. Handley ,&nbsp;Ingrid M. Nembhard ,&nbsp;Cecelia L. Corson ,&nbsp;Molly Passarella ,&nbsp;Charlotte Cecarelli ,&nbsp;Henry C. Lee ,&nbsp;Jennifer Cohen ,&nbsp;John Chuo ,&nbsp;Jennifer Tioseco ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Bonafide ,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Foglia","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The organizational culture (shared beliefs, perceptions, and values) of teams informs their behaviours and practices. Little is known about organizational culture for resuscitation teams. Our objective was to develop a reliable and valid resuscitation-specific organizational culture instrument (ROCI) with the goal of improving team performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using Neonatal Resuscitation Program principles, literature review, and discussion of existing culture measures with experts, we identified organizational culture components for resuscitation and adapted existing measures to resuscitation. We developed a ROCI with five subscales (role clarity, shared-mental models, closed-loop communication, team adaptability, and psychological safety) and administered it to neonatal resuscitation team members across a hospital network. Survey psychometric assessment included reliability analyses (Cronbach’s α, Pearson correlation coefficients) and validity testing (confirmatory factor analysis [CFA] and regression models examining the association of culture with implementation outcomes: climate and perceived success).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 11 hospitals there were 318 complete responses (41 % response rate). Of the 22-items tested, 18 were retained after iterative psychometric assessment. The ROCI had excellent overall reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.994) and very good subscale reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.789–0.867). The CFA goodness-of-fit statistics confirmed five constructs (subscales). At the individual-level, the ROCI and all subscales were associated with both implementation outcomes. At the hospital-level, the ROCI overall and three subscales were associated with perceived success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ROCI is a reliable and valid measure of the organizational culture of resuscitation teams. Future ROCI assessments may provide a foundation to inform culture change initiatives to improve resuscitation quality and outcomes across populations and contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and testing of a resuscitation-specific measure of organizational culture for resuscitation teams\",\"authors\":\"Sara C. Handley ,&nbsp;Ingrid M. Nembhard ,&nbsp;Cecelia L. Corson ,&nbsp;Molly Passarella ,&nbsp;Charlotte Cecarelli ,&nbsp;Henry C. Lee ,&nbsp;Jennifer Cohen ,&nbsp;John Chuo ,&nbsp;Jennifer Tioseco ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Bonafide ,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Foglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The organizational culture (shared beliefs, perceptions, and values) of teams informs their behaviours and practices. Little is known about organizational culture for resuscitation teams. Our objective was to develop a reliable and valid resuscitation-specific organizational culture instrument (ROCI) with the goal of improving team performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using Neonatal Resuscitation Program principles, literature review, and discussion of existing culture measures with experts, we identified organizational culture components for resuscitation and adapted existing measures to resuscitation. We developed a ROCI with five subscales (role clarity, shared-mental models, closed-loop communication, team adaptability, and psychological safety) and administered it to neonatal resuscitation team members across a hospital network. Survey psychometric assessment included reliability analyses (Cronbach’s α, Pearson correlation coefficients) and validity testing (confirmatory factor analysis [CFA] and regression models examining the association of culture with implementation outcomes: climate and perceived success).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 11 hospitals there were 318 complete responses (41 % response rate). Of the 22-items tested, 18 were retained after iterative psychometric assessment. The ROCI had excellent overall reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.994) and very good subscale reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.789–0.867). The CFA goodness-of-fit statistics confirmed five constructs (subscales). At the individual-level, the ROCI and all subscales were associated with both implementation outcomes. At the hospital-level, the ROCI overall and three subscales were associated with perceived success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ROCI is a reliable and valid measure of the organizational culture of resuscitation teams. Future ROCI assessments may provide a foundation to inform culture change initiatives to improve resuscitation quality and outcomes across populations and contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景团队的组织文化(共同的信念、认知和价值观)影响着团队的行为和实践。人们对复苏团队的组织文化知之甚少。我们的目标是开发一种可靠有效的复苏专用组织文化工具(ROCI),以提高团队绩效。方法根据新生儿复苏计划原则、文献综述以及与专家对现有文化测量方法的讨论,我们确定了复苏组织文化的组成部分,并对现有测量方法进行了调整,使其适用于复苏。我们开发了包含五个分量表(角色清晰度、共享心理模式、闭环沟通、团队适应性和心理安全)的 ROCI,并对医院网络中的新生儿复苏团队成员进行了调查。调查的心理测量评估包括可靠性分析(Cronbach's α、皮尔逊相关系数)和有效性测试(确证因子分析[CFA]和回归模型,检查文化与实施结果的关联:氛围和感知成功)。在测试的 22 个项目中,有 18 个项目经过反复的心理测量评估后被保留下来。ROCI 的总体信度极佳(Cronbach's α = 0.994),子量表信度也很好(Cronbach's α = 0.789-0.867)。CFA 拟合优度统计确认了五个构念(子量表)。在个人层面,ROCI 和所有分量表都与两个实施结果相关。结论 ROCI 是对复苏团队组织文化的可靠而有效的测量。未来的 ROCI 评估可为文化变革计划提供依据,从而改善不同人群和环境下的复苏质量和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and testing of a resuscitation-specific measure of organizational culture for resuscitation teams

Background

The organizational culture (shared beliefs, perceptions, and values) of teams informs their behaviours and practices. Little is known about organizational culture for resuscitation teams. Our objective was to develop a reliable and valid resuscitation-specific organizational culture instrument (ROCI) with the goal of improving team performance.

Methods

Using Neonatal Resuscitation Program principles, literature review, and discussion of existing culture measures with experts, we identified organizational culture components for resuscitation and adapted existing measures to resuscitation. We developed a ROCI with five subscales (role clarity, shared-mental models, closed-loop communication, team adaptability, and psychological safety) and administered it to neonatal resuscitation team members across a hospital network. Survey psychometric assessment included reliability analyses (Cronbach’s α, Pearson correlation coefficients) and validity testing (confirmatory factor analysis [CFA] and regression models examining the association of culture with implementation outcomes: climate and perceived success).

Results

Across 11 hospitals there were 318 complete responses (41 % response rate). Of the 22-items tested, 18 were retained after iterative psychometric assessment. The ROCI had excellent overall reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.994) and very good subscale reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.789–0.867). The CFA goodness-of-fit statistics confirmed five constructs (subscales). At the individual-level, the ROCI and all subscales were associated with both implementation outcomes. At the hospital-level, the ROCI overall and three subscales were associated with perceived success.

Conclusion

The ROCI is a reliable and valid measure of the organizational culture of resuscitation teams. Future ROCI assessments may provide a foundation to inform culture change initiatives to improve resuscitation quality and outcomes across populations and contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信