{"title":"三大核心矿产资源、能源不确定性和包容性数字化对经济增长的非线性影响:中美比较分析","authors":"Ziming Zhao , Jinyu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the asymmetric effects of mineral resources (oil, coal, and gas), digitalization, and energy uncertainty on economic growth in China and the USA. Using quarterly data from 2000 to 2022, we employ the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model to analyze these relationships. The study begins by conducting unit root tests, cointegration analysis, and asymmetry tests to establish robust connections between the variables. The long- and short-run results confirm the presence of asymmetry, as positive and negative shocks in oil rents, digitalization, and energy uncertainty affect economic growth differently. Notably, positive shocks in oil rents and digitalization favour economic growth, indicating that increases in oil rents and digital inclusion contribute to economic development. Conversely, positive shocks in energy uncertainty tend to reduce economic growth. Interestingly, the findings for China and the USA show similar asymmetric patterns; coal and natural gas rents positively influence economic growth, while the control variables suggest that capital and labour increase contribute to both countries' development. The error correction terms, 0.731 (73.1%) for China and 0.625 (62.5%) for the USA, indicate the annual rate at which asymmetric discrepancies are corrected. All diagnostic tests confirm the suitability of the NARDL model for this study. Finally, the study reveals significant bi-directional causality among all pairs of variables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 105331"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-linear effects of three core mineral resources, energy uncertainty, and inclusive digitalization on economic growth: A comparative analysis of US and China\",\"authors\":\"Ziming Zhao , Jinyu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the asymmetric effects of mineral resources (oil, coal, and gas), digitalization, and energy uncertainty on economic growth in China and the USA. Using quarterly data from 2000 to 2022, we employ the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model to analyze these relationships. The study begins by conducting unit root tests, cointegration analysis, and asymmetry tests to establish robust connections between the variables. The long- and short-run results confirm the presence of asymmetry, as positive and negative shocks in oil rents, digitalization, and energy uncertainty affect economic growth differently. Notably, positive shocks in oil rents and digitalization favour economic growth, indicating that increases in oil rents and digital inclusion contribute to economic development. Conversely, positive shocks in energy uncertainty tend to reduce economic growth. Interestingly, the findings for China and the USA show similar asymmetric patterns; coal and natural gas rents positively influence economic growth, while the control variables suggest that capital and labour increase contribute to both countries' development. The error correction terms, 0.731 (73.1%) for China and 0.625 (62.5%) for the USA, indicate the annual rate at which asymmetric discrepancies are corrected. All diagnostic tests confirm the suitability of the NARDL model for this study. Finally, the study reveals significant bi-directional causality among all pairs of variables.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006986\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-linear effects of three core mineral resources, energy uncertainty, and inclusive digitalization on economic growth: A comparative analysis of US and China
This study examines the asymmetric effects of mineral resources (oil, coal, and gas), digitalization, and energy uncertainty on economic growth in China and the USA. Using quarterly data from 2000 to 2022, we employ the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model to analyze these relationships. The study begins by conducting unit root tests, cointegration analysis, and asymmetry tests to establish robust connections between the variables. The long- and short-run results confirm the presence of asymmetry, as positive and negative shocks in oil rents, digitalization, and energy uncertainty affect economic growth differently. Notably, positive shocks in oil rents and digitalization favour economic growth, indicating that increases in oil rents and digital inclusion contribute to economic development. Conversely, positive shocks in energy uncertainty tend to reduce economic growth. Interestingly, the findings for China and the USA show similar asymmetric patterns; coal and natural gas rents positively influence economic growth, while the control variables suggest that capital and labour increase contribute to both countries' development. The error correction terms, 0.731 (73.1%) for China and 0.625 (62.5%) for the USA, indicate the annual rate at which asymmetric discrepancies are corrected. All diagnostic tests confirm the suitability of the NARDL model for this study. Finally, the study reveals significant bi-directional causality among all pairs of variables.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.