针对初级保健居民的预防心血管疾病的植物烹饪医学:随机对照试验

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"针对初级保健居民的预防心血管疾病的植物烹饪医学:随机对照试验","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Nutrition/Exercise</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the United States, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death, and nutrition is the leading risk factor. However, fewer than a third of internal medicine residents feel confident discussing nutrition with patients. “Culinary medicine,” by combining didactics with hands-on cooking instruction, empowers medical trainees to prevent and treat diet-related disease with their patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All 51 primary care residents at an academic medical center in New England participated in this randomized controlled study. Twenty-five residents were randomized to the intervention group and 26 to the control group. Both groups participated in 3 hours of cased-based learning, group discussion, lecture, and dietitian Q&amp;A sessions. The intervention group also received 1 hour of culinary medicine instruction in a “virtual teaching kitchen,” cooking together on Zoom and learning strategies for modifying recipes for heart-healthiness. The control group watched 1 hour of videos from the Nutrition Made Clear curriculum. Nutrition knowledge was assessed via multiple-choice questions. Confidence was measured on 6-point Likert scales. Attitudes were measured via a subscale of the Nutrition in Patient Care Survey (NIPS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NIPS subscale scores did not differ from baseline to immediate post in the control group (mean score 33.1 to 34.3, p=0.08) but did in the intervention group (34.7 to 36.1, p=0.04). Nutrition knowledge scores increased significantly from baseline to immediate post in both groups (mean % correct 53.6% to 93.7%, p=0.001 for control vs. 60.0% to 92.2%, p=0.001 for intervention). Percent of residents who felt confident providing patient-accessible dietary counseling for CVD increased significantly in the intervention group (8.3% to 52.2%, p=0.002) but did not in the control group (36.4% to 63.2%, p=0.453). At 8 weeks post, 96% of all residents reported implementing something they had learned from the curriculum into caring for patients, and their nutrition knowledge scores remained high. All residents said they would recommend the curriculum to colleagues and wanted additional nutrition education.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both culinary medicine and didactics-only nutrition education can be feasible, well-received, and effective in improving nutrition knowledge. Culinary medicine may be superior in improving learners’ attitudes about nutrition and confidence in providing dietary counseling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PLANT-FORWARD CULINARY MEDICINE FOR THE PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE FOR PRIMARY CARE RESIDENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Nutrition/Exercise</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the United States, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death, and nutrition is the leading risk factor. However, fewer than a third of internal medicine residents feel confident discussing nutrition with patients. “Culinary medicine,” by combining didactics with hands-on cooking instruction, empowers medical trainees to prevent and treat diet-related disease with their patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All 51 primary care residents at an academic medical center in New England participated in this randomized controlled study. Twenty-five residents were randomized to the intervention group and 26 to the control group. Both groups participated in 3 hours of cased-based learning, group discussion, lecture, and dietitian Q&amp;A sessions. The intervention group also received 1 hour of culinary medicine instruction in a “virtual teaching kitchen,” cooking together on Zoom and learning strategies for modifying recipes for heart-healthiness. The control group watched 1 hour of videos from the Nutrition Made Clear curriculum. Nutrition knowledge was assessed via multiple-choice questions. Confidence was measured on 6-point Likert scales. Attitudes were measured via a subscale of the Nutrition in Patient Care Survey (NIPS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NIPS subscale scores did not differ from baseline to immediate post in the control group (mean score 33.1 to 34.3, p=0.08) but did in the intervention group (34.7 to 36.1, p=0.04). Nutrition knowledge scores increased significantly from baseline to immediate post in both groups (mean % correct 53.6% to 93.7%, p=0.001 for control vs. 60.0% to 92.2%, p=0.001 for intervention). Percent of residents who felt confident providing patient-accessible dietary counseling for CVD increased significantly in the intervention group (8.3% to 52.2%, p=0.002) but did not in the control group (36.4% to 63.2%, p=0.453). At 8 weeks post, 96% of all residents reported implementing something they had learned from the curriculum into caring for patients, and their nutrition knowledge scores remained high. All residents said they would recommend the curriculum to colleagues and wanted additional nutrition education.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both culinary medicine and didactics-only nutrition education can be feasible, well-received, and effective in improving nutrition knowledge. Culinary medicine may be superior in improving learners’ attitudes about nutrition and confidence in providing dietary counseling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗领域营养/运动背景在美国,心血管疾病(CVD)是导致死亡的主要原因,而营养是主要的风险因素。然而,只有不到三分之一的内科住院医生有信心与病人讨论营养问题。"烹饪医学 "通过将教学与实际烹饪指导相结合,使医学学员有能力与病人一起预防和治疗与饮食有关的疾病。方法新英格兰一家学术医疗中心的 51 名初级保健住院医师参加了这项随机对照研究。25 名住院医师被随机分配到干预组,26 名被分配到对照组。两组均参加了 3 个小时的案例学习、小组讨论、讲座和营养师问答。干预组还在 "虚拟教学厨房 "中接受了 1 小时的烹饪医学指导,一起在 Zoom 上烹饪,并学习如何修改食谱以达到有益心脏健康的目的。对照组则观看了一小时的《营养清晰》课程视频。营养知识通过多项选择题进行评估。信心通过 6 点李克特量表进行测量。结果对照组的 NIPS 分值从基线到刚结束时没有差异(平均分从 33.1 到 34.3,p=0.08),但干预组有差异(从 34.7 到 36.1,p=0.04)。两组居民的营养知识得分从基线到刚结束时都有显著提高(对照组平均正确率从 53.6% 提高到 93.7%,p=0.001;干预组从 60.0% 提高到 92.2%,p=0.001)。在干预组中,有信心为患者提供无障碍心血管疾病饮食咨询的住院医师百分比显著增加(从 8.3% 增加到 52.2%,p=0.002),但在对照组中没有增加(从 36.4% 增加到 63.2%,p=0.453)。培训结束 8 周后,96% 的住院医师表示他们将从课程中学到的知识应用到了病人护理中,而且他们的营养知识得分仍然很高。所有住院医师都表示会向同事推荐该课程,并希望获得更多的营养教育。结论烹饪医学和纯说教式营养教育在提高营养知识方面都是可行的、受欢迎的和有效的。烹饪医学在改善学员的营养态度和提供饮食咨询的信心方面可能更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PLANT-FORWARD CULINARY MEDICINE FOR THE PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE FOR PRIMARY CARE RESIDENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Therapeutic Area

Nutrition/Exercise

Background

In the United States, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death, and nutrition is the leading risk factor. However, fewer than a third of internal medicine residents feel confident discussing nutrition with patients. “Culinary medicine,” by combining didactics with hands-on cooking instruction, empowers medical trainees to prevent and treat diet-related disease with their patients.

Methods

All 51 primary care residents at an academic medical center in New England participated in this randomized controlled study. Twenty-five residents were randomized to the intervention group and 26 to the control group. Both groups participated in 3 hours of cased-based learning, group discussion, lecture, and dietitian Q&A sessions. The intervention group also received 1 hour of culinary medicine instruction in a “virtual teaching kitchen,” cooking together on Zoom and learning strategies for modifying recipes for heart-healthiness. The control group watched 1 hour of videos from the Nutrition Made Clear curriculum. Nutrition knowledge was assessed via multiple-choice questions. Confidence was measured on 6-point Likert scales. Attitudes were measured via a subscale of the Nutrition in Patient Care Survey (NIPS).

Results

NIPS subscale scores did not differ from baseline to immediate post in the control group (mean score 33.1 to 34.3, p=0.08) but did in the intervention group (34.7 to 36.1, p=0.04). Nutrition knowledge scores increased significantly from baseline to immediate post in both groups (mean % correct 53.6% to 93.7%, p=0.001 for control vs. 60.0% to 92.2%, p=0.001 for intervention). Percent of residents who felt confident providing patient-accessible dietary counseling for CVD increased significantly in the intervention group (8.3% to 52.2%, p=0.002) but did not in the control group (36.4% to 63.2%, p=0.453). At 8 weeks post, 96% of all residents reported implementing something they had learned from the curriculum into caring for patients, and their nutrition knowledge scores remained high. All residents said they would recommend the curriculum to colleagues and wanted additional nutrition education.

Conclusions

Both culinary medicine and didactics-only nutrition education can be feasible, well-received, and effective in improving nutrition knowledge. Culinary medicine may be superior in improving learners’ attitudes about nutrition and confidence in providing dietary counseling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信