Taotao Wu , Chunji Xue , Yongheng Zhou , Lu Chai , Qingshuang Wang , Qingzhong Bao
{"title":"蒙古东北部乌兰银铅锌矿床的成因:来自S和Pb同位素以及U-Pb和Rb-Sr地质年代学的制约因素","authors":"Taotao Wu , Chunji Xue , Yongheng Zhou , Lu Chai , Qingshuang Wang , Qingzhong Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Ulaan silver-lead–zinc deposit (hereinafter referred to as the Ulaan deposit) is identified as the largest silver-lead–zinc polymetallic deposit in Mongolia, with proved reserves including 2,240 tons of silver (Ag; average grade: 49 g/t), 440,000 tons of lead (Pb; average grade: 1.13 %), and 810,000 tons of zinc (Zn; average grade: 2.07 %). However, the genesis of this deposit remains unclear. The Ag-Pb-Zn ore bodies in the deposit, occurring as cylinders in shape within the Middle-Late Jurassic rhyolites, are governed by a concealed breccia pipe. The ore minerals include galena, sphalerite, and pyrite, followed by chalcopyrite, hematite, stibnite, and siderite. The primary alterations of the surrounding rocks include silicification, chloritization, kaolinization, argillization, carbonatization, and skarnization. The Rb-Sr dating of sulfide minerals and associated vein minerals in the ores yielded isochron ages varying in a range of 146 ± 3 Ma (<em>n</em> = 6, MSWD=1.3), suggesting mineralization during the Late Jurassic. The δ<sup>34</sup>S values of sulfide minerals in the ores range from 1.6 ‰ to 4.3 ‰, suggesting that the sulfur originated primarily from magmas or deep sources. The isotopic compositions of coexisting sphalerite-galena minerals in the deposit revealed mineralization temperature estimates ranging between 331 °C and 449 °C, indicating a medium- to high-temperature ore-forming conditions. The sulfide minerals exhibit <sup>208</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb ratios ranging from 38.138 to 38.301, <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb ratios from 15.543 to 15.594, and <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb ratios from 18.318 to 18.354, suggesting that ore-forming metals, represented by Pb, also originated primarily from mantle source. The zircon U-Pb dating of rhyolites in the ore-hosting strata and ore-controlling breccia pipes yielded ages of 160.6 ± 1.7 Ma (<em>n</em> = 24, MSWD=0.68) and 161.6 ± 1.6 Ma (<em>n</em> = 30, MSWD=0.89), respectively, indicating volcanic eruptions during the early Late Jurassic. These ore-hosting rhyolites exhibit characteristics of A-type rhyolites, suggesting that they were formed in an intracontinental extensional environment. These rhyolites share similar rare earth element (REE) distribution patterns with fluorite formed in the main mineralization stage, suggesting a genetic link between the mineralization and magmatic processes. This study proposes that the Ulaan deposit was a hydrothermal deposit formed in an extensional environment following the closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean, with ore-forming metals and hydrothermal fluids associated with volcanic rocks or magmatic-hydrothermal processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19644,"journal":{"name":"Ore Geology Reviews","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 106262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genesis of the Ulaan silver-lead–zinc deposit in Northeast Mongolia: Constraints from S and Pb isotopes, together with U-Pb and Rb-Sr geochronology\",\"authors\":\"Taotao Wu , Chunji Xue , Yongheng Zhou , Lu Chai , Qingshuang Wang , Qingzhong Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Ulaan silver-lead–zinc deposit (hereinafter referred to as the Ulaan deposit) is identified as the largest silver-lead–zinc polymetallic deposit in Mongolia, with proved reserves including 2,240 tons of silver (Ag; average grade: 49 g/t), 440,000 tons of lead (Pb; average grade: 1.13 %), and 810,000 tons of zinc (Zn; average grade: 2.07 %). However, the genesis of this deposit remains unclear. The Ag-Pb-Zn ore bodies in the deposit, occurring as cylinders in shape within the Middle-Late Jurassic rhyolites, are governed by a concealed breccia pipe. The ore minerals include galena, sphalerite, and pyrite, followed by chalcopyrite, hematite, stibnite, and siderite. The primary alterations of the surrounding rocks include silicification, chloritization, kaolinization, argillization, carbonatization, and skarnization. The Rb-Sr dating of sulfide minerals and associated vein minerals in the ores yielded isochron ages varying in a range of 146 ± 3 Ma (<em>n</em> = 6, MSWD=1.3), suggesting mineralization during the Late Jurassic. The δ<sup>34</sup>S values of sulfide minerals in the ores range from 1.6 ‰ to 4.3 ‰, suggesting that the sulfur originated primarily from magmas or deep sources. The isotopic compositions of coexisting sphalerite-galena minerals in the deposit revealed mineralization temperature estimates ranging between 331 °C and 449 °C, indicating a medium- to high-temperature ore-forming conditions. The sulfide minerals exhibit <sup>208</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb ratios ranging from 38.138 to 38.301, <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb ratios from 15.543 to 15.594, and <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb ratios from 18.318 to 18.354, suggesting that ore-forming metals, represented by Pb, also originated primarily from mantle source. The zircon U-Pb dating of rhyolites in the ore-hosting strata and ore-controlling breccia pipes yielded ages of 160.6 ± 1.7 Ma (<em>n</em> = 24, MSWD=0.68) and 161.6 ± 1.6 Ma (<em>n</em> = 30, MSWD=0.89), respectively, indicating volcanic eruptions during the early Late Jurassic. These ore-hosting rhyolites exhibit characteristics of A-type rhyolites, suggesting that they were formed in an intracontinental extensional environment. These rhyolites share similar rare earth element (REE) distribution patterns with fluorite formed in the main mineralization stage, suggesting a genetic link between the mineralization and magmatic processes. This study proposes that the Ulaan deposit was a hydrothermal deposit formed in an extensional environment following the closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean, with ore-forming metals and hydrothermal fluids associated with volcanic rocks or magmatic-hydrothermal processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ore Geology Reviews\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ore Geology Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824003950\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore Geology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824003950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genesis of the Ulaan silver-lead–zinc deposit in Northeast Mongolia: Constraints from S and Pb isotopes, together with U-Pb and Rb-Sr geochronology
The Ulaan silver-lead–zinc deposit (hereinafter referred to as the Ulaan deposit) is identified as the largest silver-lead–zinc polymetallic deposit in Mongolia, with proved reserves including 2,240 tons of silver (Ag; average grade: 49 g/t), 440,000 tons of lead (Pb; average grade: 1.13 %), and 810,000 tons of zinc (Zn; average grade: 2.07 %). However, the genesis of this deposit remains unclear. The Ag-Pb-Zn ore bodies in the deposit, occurring as cylinders in shape within the Middle-Late Jurassic rhyolites, are governed by a concealed breccia pipe. The ore minerals include galena, sphalerite, and pyrite, followed by chalcopyrite, hematite, stibnite, and siderite. The primary alterations of the surrounding rocks include silicification, chloritization, kaolinization, argillization, carbonatization, and skarnization. The Rb-Sr dating of sulfide minerals and associated vein minerals in the ores yielded isochron ages varying in a range of 146 ± 3 Ma (n = 6, MSWD=1.3), suggesting mineralization during the Late Jurassic. The δ34S values of sulfide minerals in the ores range from 1.6 ‰ to 4.3 ‰, suggesting that the sulfur originated primarily from magmas or deep sources. The isotopic compositions of coexisting sphalerite-galena minerals in the deposit revealed mineralization temperature estimates ranging between 331 °C and 449 °C, indicating a medium- to high-temperature ore-forming conditions. The sulfide minerals exhibit 208Pb/204Pb ratios ranging from 38.138 to 38.301, 207Pb/204Pb ratios from 15.543 to 15.594, and 206Pb/204Pb ratios from 18.318 to 18.354, suggesting that ore-forming metals, represented by Pb, also originated primarily from mantle source. The zircon U-Pb dating of rhyolites in the ore-hosting strata and ore-controlling breccia pipes yielded ages of 160.6 ± 1.7 Ma (n = 24, MSWD=0.68) and 161.6 ± 1.6 Ma (n = 30, MSWD=0.89), respectively, indicating volcanic eruptions during the early Late Jurassic. These ore-hosting rhyolites exhibit characteristics of A-type rhyolites, suggesting that they were formed in an intracontinental extensional environment. These rhyolites share similar rare earth element (REE) distribution patterns with fluorite formed in the main mineralization stage, suggesting a genetic link between the mineralization and magmatic processes. This study proposes that the Ulaan deposit was a hydrothermal deposit formed in an extensional environment following the closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean, with ore-forming metals and hydrothermal fluids associated with volcanic rocks or magmatic-hydrothermal processes.
期刊介绍:
Ore Geology Reviews aims to familiarize all earth scientists with recent advances in a number of interconnected disciplines related to the study of, and search for, ore deposits. The reviews range from brief to longer contributions, but the journal preferentially publishes manuscripts that fill the niche between the commonly shorter journal articles and the comprehensive book coverages, and thus has a special appeal to many authors and readers.