无形资产投资和经济复杂性

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
{"title":"无形资产投资和经济复杂性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study the nexus between a country's economic complexity and its investment level in intangible assets. Our data spans 27 countries, all sector classifications and 8 intangible categories, which allows us to consider over 188 indicators per country. Our approach offers a complementary more policy-oriented perspective, for economic complexity, compared to relatedness. Results underscore the significance of high knowledge intensity intangibles, such as research and development, in explaining economic complexity. Policy recommendations advocate for prioritizing R&amp;D in manufacturing, alongside fostering complementary activities like employee training, design, and branding in the same sector. In the first part of our results, we introduce an intangible-complexity score for policymakers, enabling the assessment of a country's relative performance in ensuring complexity through investments in various forms of intangible capital, on a country basis. Our second set of estimates, which control for a vast set of potential confounders (almost 800), offer a precise measure of the average impact of intangible investments on complexity, and allow us to argue for the empirical superiority of recent advances in causal machine learning when modeling complexity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investment in intangible assets and economic complexity\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We study the nexus between a country's economic complexity and its investment level in intangible assets. Our data spans 27 countries, all sector classifications and 8 intangible categories, which allows us to consider over 188 indicators per country. Our approach offers a complementary more policy-oriented perspective, for economic complexity, compared to relatedness. Results underscore the significance of high knowledge intensity intangibles, such as research and development, in explaining economic complexity. Policy recommendations advocate for prioritizing R&amp;D in manufacturing, alongside fostering complementary activities like employee training, design, and branding in the same sector. In the first part of our results, we introduce an intangible-complexity score for policymakers, enabling the assessment of a country's relative performance in ensuring complexity through investments in various forms of intangible capital, on a country basis. Our second set of estimates, which control for a vast set of potential confounders (almost 800), offer a precise measure of the average impact of intangible investments on complexity, and allow us to argue for the empirical superiority of recent advances in causal machine learning when modeling complexity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001823\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001823","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了一个国家的经济复杂性与其无形资产投资水平之间的关系。我们的数据横跨 27 个国家、所有行业分类和 8 个无形资产类别,这使我们能够考虑每个国家超过 188 个指标。与相关性相比,我们的方法为经济复杂性提供了一个更面向政策的补充视角。研究结果强调了研发等高知识密集度无形资产在解释经济复杂性方面的重要性。政策建议主张优先考虑制造业的研究与开发,同时促进同一行业的员工培训、设计和品牌推广等互补活动。在第一部分的研究成果中,我们为政策制定者引入了无形复杂性评分,从而能够以国家为单位,评估一个国家在通过投资各种形式的无形资本来确保复杂性方面的相对表现。我们的第二组估计值控制了大量的潜在混杂因素(近 800 个),提供了无形投资对复杂性平均影响的精确测量,使我们能够论证因果机器学习的最新进展在复杂性建模方面的经验优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investment in intangible assets and economic complexity
We study the nexus between a country's economic complexity and its investment level in intangible assets. Our data spans 27 countries, all sector classifications and 8 intangible categories, which allows us to consider over 188 indicators per country. Our approach offers a complementary more policy-oriented perspective, for economic complexity, compared to relatedness. Results underscore the significance of high knowledge intensity intangibles, such as research and development, in explaining economic complexity. Policy recommendations advocate for prioritizing R&D in manufacturing, alongside fostering complementary activities like employee training, design, and branding in the same sector. In the first part of our results, we introduce an intangible-complexity score for policymakers, enabling the assessment of a country's relative performance in ensuring complexity through investments in various forms of intangible capital, on a country basis. Our second set of estimates, which control for a vast set of potential confounders (almost 800), offer a precise measure of the average impact of intangible investments on complexity, and allow us to argue for the empirical superiority of recent advances in causal machine learning when modeling complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信