恩斯特-海克尔《自然形态学》中的原生生物

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
John R. Dolan
{"title":"恩斯特-海克尔《自然形态学》中的原生生物","authors":"John R. Dolan","doi":"10.1016/j.protis.2024.126069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Haeckel’s ’art book’, <em>Kunstformen der Natur</em>, is likely familiar to most protistologists as it is probably Haeckel’s best known work, and it prominently featured protists. No doubt many of us have used some of the images from it in our lectures. Most familiar are perhaps the often-reproduced images of nassularian radiolaria, but plates were also devoted to phaeodarians, acantharia, foraminifera, ciliates, diatoms, dinoflagellates and desmids. Despite the fame of <em>Kunstformen der Natur</em>, there are aspects of the work that have received little attention, and are of potential interest to protistologists. These include the overall importance of protists in the work, compared to other taxa, the surprisingly under appreciated role of Haeckel’s collaborator, Adolph Giltsch in creating the figures, the disputed fidelity of the illustrations of protists, and Haeckel’s discrete inclusion of many descriptions of new species of protists, forcing us to consider <em>Kunstformen</em> a scientific publication. Here these aspects, and the 20 plates featuring protists will be reviewed. The goal of this review is to familiarize protistologists with the most famous work featuring protists, and point out the many particular figures of protists we may wish to avoid showcasing, as the illustrations are questionable. A supplemental file is provided listing the currently accepted names of the protist taxa (for names found in a database), and the reasons for considering some illustrations as questionable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20781,"journal":{"name":"Protist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The protists of Ernst Haeckel’s Kunstformen der Natur\",\"authors\":\"John R. Dolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.protis.2024.126069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Haeckel’s ’art book’, <em>Kunstformen der Natur</em>, is likely familiar to most protistologists as it is probably Haeckel’s best known work, and it prominently featured protists. No doubt many of us have used some of the images from it in our lectures. Most familiar are perhaps the often-reproduced images of nassularian radiolaria, but plates were also devoted to phaeodarians, acantharia, foraminifera, ciliates, diatoms, dinoflagellates and desmids. Despite the fame of <em>Kunstformen der Natur</em>, there are aspects of the work that have received little attention, and are of potential interest to protistologists. These include the overall importance of protists in the work, compared to other taxa, the surprisingly under appreciated role of Haeckel’s collaborator, Adolph Giltsch in creating the figures, the disputed fidelity of the illustrations of protists, and Haeckel’s discrete inclusion of many descriptions of new species of protists, forcing us to consider <em>Kunstformen</em> a scientific publication. Here these aspects, and the 20 plates featuring protists will be reviewed. The goal of this review is to familiarize protistologists with the most famous work featuring protists, and point out the many particular figures of protists we may wish to avoid showcasing, as the illustrations are questionable. A supplemental file is provided listing the currently accepted names of the protist taxa (for names found in a database), and the reasons for considering some illustrations as questionable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Protist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Protist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1434461024000610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1434461024000610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数原生生物学家可能对海克尔的 "艺术书"《Kunstformen der Natur》并不陌生,因为这本书可能是海克尔最著名的作品,其中突出介绍了原生生物。毫无疑问,我们中的许多人都曾在讲座中使用过其中的一些图片。大家最熟悉的可能是经常被复制的纳氏放射虫的图片,但也有专门介绍辉石虫、棘皮动物、有孔虫、纤毛虫、硅藻、甲藻和脱壳虫的图版。尽管《Kunstformen der Natur》声名远播,但该作品的某些方面却鲜有人关注,而原生动物学家却可能对此感兴趣。这些方面包括:与其他类群相比,原生动物在该著作中的整体重要性;海克尔的合作者阿道夫-吉尔施(Adolph Giltsch)在绘制图像中发挥的作用出人意料地未得到充分重视;原生动物插图的真实性存在争议;海克尔单独纳入了许多原生动物新物种的描述,迫使我们将《Kunstformen》视为一份科学出版物。在此,我们将对这些方面以及 20 幅以原生动物为主题的图版进行回顾。这篇评论的目的是让原生生物学家熟悉这本以原生生物为主题的最著名作品,并指出我们可能希望避免展示的许多特定的原生生物形象,因为这些插图是有问题的。我们还提供了一份补充文件,列出了目前公认的原生生物类群名称(针对数据库中找到的名称),以及认为某些插图有问题的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The protists of Ernst Haeckel’s Kunstformen der Natur
Haeckel’s ’art book’, Kunstformen der Natur, is likely familiar to most protistologists as it is probably Haeckel’s best known work, and it prominently featured protists. No doubt many of us have used some of the images from it in our lectures. Most familiar are perhaps the often-reproduced images of nassularian radiolaria, but plates were also devoted to phaeodarians, acantharia, foraminifera, ciliates, diatoms, dinoflagellates and desmids. Despite the fame of Kunstformen der Natur, there are aspects of the work that have received little attention, and are of potential interest to protistologists. These include the overall importance of protists in the work, compared to other taxa, the surprisingly under appreciated role of Haeckel’s collaborator, Adolph Giltsch in creating the figures, the disputed fidelity of the illustrations of protists, and Haeckel’s discrete inclusion of many descriptions of new species of protists, forcing us to consider Kunstformen a scientific publication. Here these aspects, and the 20 plates featuring protists will be reviewed. The goal of this review is to familiarize protistologists with the most famous work featuring protists, and point out the many particular figures of protists we may wish to avoid showcasing, as the illustrations are questionable. A supplemental file is provided listing the currently accepted names of the protist taxa (for names found in a database), and the reasons for considering some illustrations as questionable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Protist
Protist 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
18.7 weeks
期刊介绍: Protist is the international forum for reporting substantial and novel findings in any area of research on protists. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts are scientific excellence, significance, and interest for a broad readership. Suitable subject areas include: molecular, cell and developmental biology, biochemistry, systematics and phylogeny, and ecology of protists. Both autotrophic and heterotrophic protists as well as parasites are covered. The journal publishes original papers, short historical perspectives and includes a news and views section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信