应用范围界定工具和 AMBER 模型对加纳废弃放射源井孔处置系统的屏障系统进行辐射安全评估

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
C. Kansaana , F. Sam , A. Faanu , E.T. Glover , E. Akrobortu , E.A. Adofo , R.A.T. Annan , P. Essel , P.J. Adeti , Isaac Owusu
{"title":"应用范围界定工具和 AMBER 模型对加纳废弃放射源井孔处置系统的屏障系统进行辐射安全评估","authors":"C. Kansaana ,&nbsp;F. Sam ,&nbsp;A. Faanu ,&nbsp;E.T. Glover ,&nbsp;E. Akrobortu ,&nbsp;E.A. Adofo ,&nbsp;R.A.T. Annan ,&nbsp;P. Essel ,&nbsp;P.J. Adeti ,&nbsp;Isaac Owusu","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Radiological safety assessment was carried out to assess the integrity and longevity of the barrier systems of the borehole disposal system (BDS) for the disposal of disused sources in Ghana. The design of the BDS incorporates both the engineered and natural barriers into its safety concept. The safety of the BDS requires confidence in the ability of the engineered barriers on the host environmental conditions to provide containment for the disused sources for a sufficient length of time. The results obtained from the scoping tool indicated that the dose limit was exceeded which showed that the containment provided by the engineered barriers was not sufficient to ensure safety of the disposal system for the specified environmental conditions and radionuclides inventory. Detailed modelling was performed with an AMBER model to evaluate the containment provided by the engineered barriers and the geosphere with some identified scenarios. The AMBER model results showed that the calculated peak dose from any of the disposed radionuclides for the identified scenarios was below the dose constraint of 0.3 mSv/y. The peak doses occurred around 2000–1000000 years. The peak doses were seen to be mainly derived from Ra-266 and Am-241 and/or their daughters. The disused sources could be disposed of safely in the disposal system either in an oxidizing or reducing fractured/porous flow environment without posing any significant radiological threat to humans and the environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 112273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the scoping tool and AMBER model in radiological safety assessment of the barrier systems of the borehole disposal system for the disposal of disused sources in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"C. Kansaana ,&nbsp;F. Sam ,&nbsp;A. Faanu ,&nbsp;E.T. Glover ,&nbsp;E. Akrobortu ,&nbsp;E.A. Adofo ,&nbsp;R.A.T. Annan ,&nbsp;P. Essel ,&nbsp;P.J. Adeti ,&nbsp;Isaac Owusu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Radiological safety assessment was carried out to assess the integrity and longevity of the barrier systems of the borehole disposal system (BDS) for the disposal of disused sources in Ghana. The design of the BDS incorporates both the engineered and natural barriers into its safety concept. The safety of the BDS requires confidence in the ability of the engineered barriers on the host environmental conditions to provide containment for the disused sources for a sufficient length of time. The results obtained from the scoping tool indicated that the dose limit was exceeded which showed that the containment provided by the engineered barriers was not sufficient to ensure safety of the disposal system for the specified environmental conditions and radionuclides inventory. Detailed modelling was performed with an AMBER model to evaluate the containment provided by the engineered barriers and the geosphere with some identified scenarios. The AMBER model results showed that the calculated peak dose from any of the disposed radionuclides for the identified scenarios was below the dose constraint of 0.3 mSv/y. The peak doses occurred around 2000–1000000 years. The peak doses were seen to be mainly derived from Ra-266 and Am-241 and/or their daughters. The disused sources could be disposed of safely in the disposal system either in an oxidizing or reducing fractured/porous flow environment without posing any significant radiological threat to humans and the environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24007655\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24007655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为评估用于加纳废弃放射源处置的钻孔处置系统(BDS)屏障系统的完整性和使用寿命,进行了辐射安全评估。BDS 的设计将工程屏障和天然屏障纳入其安全概念。要保证 BDS 的安全,就必须相信工程屏障在当地环境条件下有能力在足够长的时间内对废弃污染源进行封堵。范围界定工具得出的结果表明,已超过剂量限值,这表明工程屏障提供的封隔力不足以确保特定环境条件和放射性核素清单下的处置系统安全。利用 AMBER 模型进行了详细建模,以评估工程屏障和地圈在一些已确定的情况下提供的密封性。AMBER 模型的结果表明,在已确定的方案中,任何一种放射性核素的计算峰值剂量都低于 0.3 mSv/y 的剂量限制。峰值剂量出现在 2000-1000000 年左右。峰值剂量主要来自镭-266 和镅-241 和/或它们的子源。废弃的放射源可以在氧化或还原断裂/多孔流环境中的处置系统中安全处置,不会对人类和环境造成任何重大辐射威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of the scoping tool and AMBER model in radiological safety assessment of the barrier systems of the borehole disposal system for the disposal of disused sources in Ghana
Radiological safety assessment was carried out to assess the integrity and longevity of the barrier systems of the borehole disposal system (BDS) for the disposal of disused sources in Ghana. The design of the BDS incorporates both the engineered and natural barriers into its safety concept. The safety of the BDS requires confidence in the ability of the engineered barriers on the host environmental conditions to provide containment for the disused sources for a sufficient length of time. The results obtained from the scoping tool indicated that the dose limit was exceeded which showed that the containment provided by the engineered barriers was not sufficient to ensure safety of the disposal system for the specified environmental conditions and radionuclides inventory. Detailed modelling was performed with an AMBER model to evaluate the containment provided by the engineered barriers and the geosphere with some identified scenarios. The AMBER model results showed that the calculated peak dose from any of the disposed radionuclides for the identified scenarios was below the dose constraint of 0.3 mSv/y. The peak doses occurred around 2000–1000000 years. The peak doses were seen to be mainly derived from Ra-266 and Am-241 and/or their daughters. The disused sources could be disposed of safely in the disposal system either in an oxidizing or reducing fractured/porous flow environment without posing any significant radiological threat to humans and the environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信