在跨专业教育出院模拟中衡量学生的能力

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Dawn Mosher DNP, RN, CHSE, CNE , Radhika Sreedhar MD, MS , Norman Martin MacDowell DrPH, MBA , Linda Chang PharmD, MPH, BCPS , Paul David Chastain II PhD
{"title":"在跨专业教育出院模拟中衡量学生的能力","authors":"Dawn Mosher DNP, RN, CHSE, CNE ,&nbsp;Radhika Sreedhar MD, MS ,&nbsp;Norman Martin MacDowell DrPH, MBA ,&nbsp;Linda Chang PharmD, MPH, BCPS ,&nbsp;Paul David Chastain II PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many patients report a clinical adverse event after being discharged from the hospital. Communication interventions provided at time of discharge are associated with significantly lower readmission rates, increased adherence to treatment, and higher patient satisfaction. Despite hospital discharge being important for patient safety, formal Interprofessional team-based patient discharge curricula for health care students is limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical students from medicine, nursing, and pharmacy participated in the simulation. Teams were evaluated via pre- and post-workshop self-evaluation, faculty evaluation of verbal and written discharge instruction competency and communication standards.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Self-assessment questions showed significant positive changes after the simulation. Student teams met about half of the discharge plan competency standards measured. Specific communication standards were met by most teams. Written discharge instructions fell short of expected outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The simulation helped students develop skills in planning discharge of patients while working in an interdisciplinary team. Students would benefit from more structured education and practice before completing the simulation to increase the likelihood of teams meeting established competency standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring student competency in an interprofessional education hospital discharge simulation\",\"authors\":\"Dawn Mosher DNP, RN, CHSE, CNE ,&nbsp;Radhika Sreedhar MD, MS ,&nbsp;Norman Martin MacDowell DrPH, MBA ,&nbsp;Linda Chang PharmD, MPH, BCPS ,&nbsp;Paul David Chastain II PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many patients report a clinical adverse event after being discharged from the hospital. Communication interventions provided at time of discharge are associated with significantly lower readmission rates, increased adherence to treatment, and higher patient satisfaction. Despite hospital discharge being important for patient safety, formal Interprofessional team-based patient discharge curricula for health care students is limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical students from medicine, nursing, and pharmacy participated in the simulation. Teams were evaluated via pre- and post-workshop self-evaluation, faculty evaluation of verbal and written discharge instruction competency and communication standards.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Self-assessment questions showed significant positive changes after the simulation. Student teams met about half of the discharge plan competency standards measured. Specific communication standards were met by most teams. Written discharge instructions fell short of expected outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The simulation helped students develop skills in planning discharge of patients while working in an interdisciplinary team. Students would benefit from more structured education and practice before completing the simulation to increase the likelihood of teams meeting established competency standards.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001063\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景许多患者在出院后都会报告临床不良事件。出院时提供的沟通干预可显著降低再入院率、提高治疗依从性和患者满意度。尽管出院对患者安全非常重要,但针对医学生的基于跨专业团队的正式患者出院课程却非常有限。方法来自医学、护理学和药学的临床学生参加了模拟课程,通过课程前后的自我评估、教师对口头和书面出院指导能力的评估以及沟通标准对团队进行评估。学生团队达到了约一半的出院计划能力标准。大多数团队都达到了具体的沟通标准。结论模拟训练有助于学生在跨学科团队工作中培养规划病人出院的技能。在完成模拟之前,学生可以从更多的结构化教育和练习中获益,以提高团队达到既定能力标准的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring student competency in an interprofessional education hospital discharge simulation

Background

Many patients report a clinical adverse event after being discharged from the hospital. Communication interventions provided at time of discharge are associated with significantly lower readmission rates, increased adherence to treatment, and higher patient satisfaction. Despite hospital discharge being important for patient safety, formal Interprofessional team-based patient discharge curricula for health care students is limited.

Methods

Clinical students from medicine, nursing, and pharmacy participated in the simulation. Teams were evaluated via pre- and post-workshop self-evaluation, faculty evaluation of verbal and written discharge instruction competency and communication standards.

Results

Self-assessment questions showed significant positive changes after the simulation. Student teams met about half of the discharge plan competency standards measured. Specific communication standards were met by most teams. Written discharge instructions fell short of expected outcomes.

Conclusion

The simulation helped students develop skills in planning discharge of patients while working in an interdisciplinary team. Students would benefit from more structured education and practice before completing the simulation to increase the likelihood of teams meeting established competency standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信