基于模拟模式的社区卫生护理学习成果差异

IF 3.4 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101606

Amelia Perez PhD, RN, Angela Andrews PhD, RN, Rebecca Luebbert PhD, RN

{"title":"基于模拟模式的社区卫生护理学习成果差异","authors":"Amelia Perez PhD, RN, Angela Andrews PhD, RN, Rebecca Luebbert PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Various modalities of community health nursing simulation have been useful in improving confidence, communication, and meeting learning objectives. Research focusing on comparing community health nursing learning outcomes in simulation with standardized patients versus mannequins is limited. This study aimed to explore differences in clinical reasoning, clinical learning, knowledge, communication, self-confidence, and learner satisfaction among community health students participating in standardized patient simulation compared to mannequins.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 66 prelicensure students in community health nursing. Students completed a pre- and post-knowledge quiz, Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale, and a simulation evaluation survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to simulation with mannequins, clinical reasoning, clinical learning, knowledge, communication, realism, and learner satisfaction scores were significantly higher with standardized patient simulation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Simulation with standardized patients can be useful for increasing community health nursing knowledge while enhancing clinical reasoning and realism. Future research including larger samples and more comprehensive community health topics is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101606"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in community health nursing learning outcomes based on simulation modality\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Perez PhD, RN, Angela Andrews PhD, RN, Rebecca Luebbert PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Various modalities of community health nursing simulation have been useful in improving confidence, communication, and meeting learning objectives. Research focusing on comparing community health nursing learning outcomes in simulation with standardized patients versus mannequins is limited. This study aimed to explore differences in clinical reasoning, clinical learning, knowledge, communication, self-confidence, and learner satisfaction among community health students participating in standardized patient simulation compared to mannequins.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 66 prelicensure students in community health nursing. Students completed a pre- and post-knowledge quiz, Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale, and a simulation evaluation survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to simulation with mannequins, clinical reasoning, clinical learning, knowledge, communication, realism, and learner satisfaction scores were significantly higher with standardized patient simulation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Simulation with standardized patients can be useful for increasing community health nursing knowledge while enhancing clinical reasoning and realism. Future research including larger samples and more comprehensive community health topics is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000987\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景各种模式的社区健康护理模拟在提高自信心、加强沟通和达到学习目标方面都很有用。关于比较标准化病人与人体模型模拟社区健康护理学习成果的研究十分有限。本研究旨在探讨参加标准化病人模拟的社区卫生学生与人体模型相比在临床推理、临床学习、知识、沟通、自信心和学习者满意度方面的差异。结果与人体模型模拟相比，标准化病人模拟的临床推理、临床学习、知识、沟通、真实感和学习者满意度得分均显著高于人体模型模拟。未来的研究需要包括更大的样本和更全面的社区健康主题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Differences in community health nursing learning outcomes based on simulation modality

Background

Various modalities of community health nursing simulation have been useful in improving confidence, communication, and meeting learning objectives. Research focusing on comparing community health nursing learning outcomes in simulation with standardized patients versus mannequins is limited. This study aimed to explore differences in clinical reasoning, clinical learning, knowledge, communication, self-confidence, and learner satisfaction among community health students participating in standardized patient simulation compared to mannequins.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 66 prelicensure students in community health nursing. Students completed a pre- and post-knowledge quiz, Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale, and a simulation evaluation survey.

Results

Compared to simulation with mannequins, clinical reasoning, clinical learning, knowledge, communication, realism, and learner satisfaction scores were significantly higher with standardized patient simulation.

Conclusions

Simulation with standardized patients can be useful for increasing community health nursing knowledge while enhancing clinical reasoning and realism. Future research including larger samples and more comprehensive community health topics is needed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Simulation in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

15.40%

发文量

107

期刊介绍： Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.