海滩形态对风暴响应的影响

IF 1.6 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jun Cheng, Ping Wang, Elizabeth Royer, Dallas Ragusa, Shalini Katwal, Cecilia Limon Nocelo
{"title":"海滩形态对风暴响应的影响","authors":"Jun Cheng,&nbsp;Ping Wang,&nbsp;Elizabeth Royer,&nbsp;Dallas Ragusa,&nbsp;Shalini Katwal,&nbsp;Cecilia Limon Nocelo","doi":"10.1007/s44218-024-00058-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Field observations on storm induced beach changes are important to improve our effort on beach management. This study compared storm induced beach changes caused by hurricane Hermine in 2016 (4 years after a beach nourishment) and Tropical Storm Eta in 2020 (2 years after a beach renourishment) along the barrier-island coast of west-central Florida. Pre-Eta beach were 1 to 2 times wider than that of pre-Hermine. Since Hurricane Hermine and TS Eta generated a similar hydrodynamic condition for the study site, comparing beach changes induced by these two storms provides a unique opportunity to investigate the response of different antecedent beach conditions to energetic events. The shore protection effect of beach nourishment is apparently evidenced by the fact that post-Eta shoreline was located seaward of those post-Hermine at half of the beach-profile locations in the study area. The shore protection effect in the subaerial portion of the beach, however, is not obvious for the other half of beach profiles where shoreline positions were retreated to similar locations after these two storms. Instead, their shore protection effect occurred in the sub-aqueous portion of the beach and was indicated by higher sandbar crests located closer to the shoreline, which can dissipate and reduce incoming wave energy. The shoreline elevation needs to be properly defined (Mean High Water vs Mean Low Water line) as it is used as a proxy to represent beach volume loss. For Hermine induced beach change, no significant correlation exists between MHW line change and beach volume loss. While a significant correlation exists between MHW line change and beach volume loss induced by TS Eta. This correlation pattern switched if the shoreline here is defined as mean low water line. For efficient beach/shoreline management, multiple proxies (e.g., sandbar height and location of its crest and trough) in addition to shoreline change should be used to assess the performance of beach nourishment project.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100098,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Coasts","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44218-024-00058-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of nourished beach morphology on storm response\",\"authors\":\"Jun Cheng,&nbsp;Ping Wang,&nbsp;Elizabeth Royer,&nbsp;Dallas Ragusa,&nbsp;Shalini Katwal,&nbsp;Cecilia Limon Nocelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44218-024-00058-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Field observations on storm induced beach changes are important to improve our effort on beach management. This study compared storm induced beach changes caused by hurricane Hermine in 2016 (4 years after a beach nourishment) and Tropical Storm Eta in 2020 (2 years after a beach renourishment) along the barrier-island coast of west-central Florida. Pre-Eta beach were 1 to 2 times wider than that of pre-Hermine. Since Hurricane Hermine and TS Eta generated a similar hydrodynamic condition for the study site, comparing beach changes induced by these two storms provides a unique opportunity to investigate the response of different antecedent beach conditions to energetic events. The shore protection effect of beach nourishment is apparently evidenced by the fact that post-Eta shoreline was located seaward of those post-Hermine at half of the beach-profile locations in the study area. The shore protection effect in the subaerial portion of the beach, however, is not obvious for the other half of beach profiles where shoreline positions were retreated to similar locations after these two storms. Instead, their shore protection effect occurred in the sub-aqueous portion of the beach and was indicated by higher sandbar crests located closer to the shoreline, which can dissipate and reduce incoming wave energy. The shoreline elevation needs to be properly defined (Mean High Water vs Mean Low Water line) as it is used as a proxy to represent beach volume loss. For Hermine induced beach change, no significant correlation exists between MHW line change and beach volume loss. While a significant correlation exists between MHW line change and beach volume loss induced by TS Eta. This correlation pattern switched if the shoreline here is defined as mean low water line. For efficient beach/shoreline management, multiple proxies (e.g., sandbar height and location of its crest and trough) in addition to shoreline change should be used to assess the performance of beach nourishment project.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropocene Coasts\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44218-024-00058-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropocene Coasts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44218-024-00058-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44218-024-00058-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对风暴引起的海滩变化进行实地观测,对于改进我们的海滩管理工作非常重要。本研究比较了佛罗里达州中西部屏障岛海岸因 2016 年飓风赫尔曼(海滩整修 4 年后)和 2020 年热带风暴埃塔(海滩整修 2 年后)而引起的海滩变化。Eta 前的海滩比 Hermine 前的海滩宽 1 到 2 倍。由于飓风 Hermine 和 TS Eta 为研究地点带来了相似的流体动力条件,因此比较这两次风暴引起的海滩变化为研究不同的前滩条件对高能事件的响应提供了一个独特的机会。在研究区域一半的海滩轮廓位置,埃塔风暴后的海岸线位于赫米纳风暴后海岸线的外海,这显然证明了海滩整修对海岸的保护作用。然而,在另外一半的海滩剖面上,这两次风暴后海岸线位置后退到类似位置的海滩剖面上,海岸保护作用在海滩的陆下部分并不明显。相反,它们的海岸保护效果出现在海滩的水下部分,表现为更靠近海岸线的沙洲峰更高,这可以消散和减少涌入的波浪能量。海岸线高程需要正确定义(平均高水位线与平均低水位线),因为它被用来代表海滩体积损失。对于赫尔曼海啸引起的海滩变化,平均高水位线变化与海滩体积损失之间不存在显著相关性。而由 TS Eta 引起的 MHW 线变化与海滩体积损失之间存在明显的相关性。如果这里的海岸线被定义为平均低水位线,这种相关模式就会发生变化。为了有效地管理海滩/海岸线,除了海岸线变化外,还应该使用多种代用指标(如沙洲高度及其波峰和波谷的位置)来评估海滩滋养工程的绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of nourished beach morphology on storm response

Field observations on storm induced beach changes are important to improve our effort on beach management. This study compared storm induced beach changes caused by hurricane Hermine in 2016 (4 years after a beach nourishment) and Tropical Storm Eta in 2020 (2 years after a beach renourishment) along the barrier-island coast of west-central Florida. Pre-Eta beach were 1 to 2 times wider than that of pre-Hermine. Since Hurricane Hermine and TS Eta generated a similar hydrodynamic condition for the study site, comparing beach changes induced by these two storms provides a unique opportunity to investigate the response of different antecedent beach conditions to energetic events. The shore protection effect of beach nourishment is apparently evidenced by the fact that post-Eta shoreline was located seaward of those post-Hermine at half of the beach-profile locations in the study area. The shore protection effect in the subaerial portion of the beach, however, is not obvious for the other half of beach profiles where shoreline positions were retreated to similar locations after these two storms. Instead, their shore protection effect occurred in the sub-aqueous portion of the beach and was indicated by higher sandbar crests located closer to the shoreline, which can dissipate and reduce incoming wave energy. The shoreline elevation needs to be properly defined (Mean High Water vs Mean Low Water line) as it is used as a proxy to represent beach volume loss. For Hermine induced beach change, no significant correlation exists between MHW line change and beach volume loss. While a significant correlation exists between MHW line change and beach volume loss induced by TS Eta. This correlation pattern switched if the shoreline here is defined as mean low water line. For efficient beach/shoreline management, multiple proxies (e.g., sandbar height and location of its crest and trough) in addition to shoreline change should be used to assess the performance of beach nourishment project.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信