Jorge Ruiz-Arocho, Raúl González-Salas, Gabriel LeMay, Nicholas Steinthal, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Ana Wegier, Ofelia Vargas-Ponce, Lislie Solís-Montero, Quetzalcóatl Orozco-Ramírez, Yolanda H. Chen
{"title":"叶食草动物与农业有何关系?来自墨西哥作物起源中心的启示","authors":"Jorge Ruiz-Arocho, Raúl González-Salas, Gabriel LeMay, Nicholas Steinthal, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Ana Wegier, Ofelia Vargas-Ponce, Lislie Solís-Montero, Quetzalcóatl Orozco-Ramírez, Yolanda H. Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although insect herbivory is thought to be higher in agroecosystems compared to natural ecosystems, direct evidence on how agriculture itself has impacted herbivory remains scarce. To understand the effects of agriculture, or the cultivation of domesticated crops, over higher trophic levels, it is necessary to compare cultivated crops and their wild counterparts in centers of origin. In such regions, insect herbivores have a shared history of interacting with wild host plants prior to crop domestication and cultivation. However, most studies evaluating the impacts of agriculture on herbivory have been conducted in geographic regions where crops have been introduced. Here, we studied how insect herbivory is related to agriculture in Mexico, which is part of the Mesoamerican center of origin. We focused on patterns of leaf herbivory across four Mexican crops (squash, beans, maize, and husk tomatoes). We tested if total leaf herbivory, as well as the composition and dominance of different types of damage caused by leaf-feeding insects, differed between domesticated crops and their wild counterparts. Overall, we found that the relationship between agriculture and leaf herbivory depends on the observed crop. Compared to their wild ancestors (or wild relatives), leaf herbivory was higher in squash and maize, lower in husk tomatoes, and similar in beans. We also found that, due to differences in damaged area and/or shifts in dominance, damage compositions varied in squash, maize, and husk tomatoes. Therefore, our findings reinforce the idea that crop resistance against herbivory varies depending on the plant species and herbivore under study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"18 1","pages":"89 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is leaf herbivory related to agriculture? Insights from the Mexican center of crop origin\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Ruiz-Arocho, Raúl González-Salas, Gabriel LeMay, Nicholas Steinthal, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Ana Wegier, Ofelia Vargas-Ponce, Lislie Solís-Montero, Quetzalcóatl Orozco-Ramírez, Yolanda H. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although insect herbivory is thought to be higher in agroecosystems compared to natural ecosystems, direct evidence on how agriculture itself has impacted herbivory remains scarce. To understand the effects of agriculture, or the cultivation of domesticated crops, over higher trophic levels, it is necessary to compare cultivated crops and their wild counterparts in centers of origin. In such regions, insect herbivores have a shared history of interacting with wild host plants prior to crop domestication and cultivation. However, most studies evaluating the impacts of agriculture on herbivory have been conducted in geographic regions where crops have been introduced. Here, we studied how insect herbivory is related to agriculture in Mexico, which is part of the Mesoamerican center of origin. We focused on patterns of leaf herbivory across four Mexican crops (squash, beans, maize, and husk tomatoes). We tested if total leaf herbivory, as well as the composition and dominance of different types of damage caused by leaf-feeding insects, differed between domesticated crops and their wild counterparts. Overall, we found that the relationship between agriculture and leaf herbivory depends on the observed crop. Compared to their wild ancestors (or wild relatives), leaf herbivory was higher in squash and maize, lower in husk tomatoes, and similar in beans. We also found that, due to differences in damaged area and/or shifts in dominance, damage compositions varied in squash, maize, and husk tomatoes. Therefore, our findings reinforce the idea that crop resistance against herbivory varies depending on the plant species and herbivore under study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthropod-Plant Interactions\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"89 - 104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthropod-Plant Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How is leaf herbivory related to agriculture? Insights from the Mexican center of crop origin
Although insect herbivory is thought to be higher in agroecosystems compared to natural ecosystems, direct evidence on how agriculture itself has impacted herbivory remains scarce. To understand the effects of agriculture, or the cultivation of domesticated crops, over higher trophic levels, it is necessary to compare cultivated crops and their wild counterparts in centers of origin. In such regions, insect herbivores have a shared history of interacting with wild host plants prior to crop domestication and cultivation. However, most studies evaluating the impacts of agriculture on herbivory have been conducted in geographic regions where crops have been introduced. Here, we studied how insect herbivory is related to agriculture in Mexico, which is part of the Mesoamerican center of origin. We focused on patterns of leaf herbivory across four Mexican crops (squash, beans, maize, and husk tomatoes). We tested if total leaf herbivory, as well as the composition and dominance of different types of damage caused by leaf-feeding insects, differed between domesticated crops and their wild counterparts. Overall, we found that the relationship between agriculture and leaf herbivory depends on the observed crop. Compared to their wild ancestors (or wild relatives), leaf herbivory was higher in squash and maize, lower in husk tomatoes, and similar in beans. We also found that, due to differences in damaged area and/or shifts in dominance, damage compositions varied in squash, maize, and husk tomatoes. Therefore, our findings reinforce the idea that crop resistance against herbivory varies depending on the plant species and herbivore under study.
期刊介绍:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism.
Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.