{"title":"评估最佳管理方法在减少印度下苏特雷杰河流域沉积物产量和养分流失方面的功效","authors":"Navneet Sharma, Abrar Yousuf, Arun Kaushal","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07491-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil erosion is one of the most serious environmental concerns as it threatens the sustainable agriculture and poses a grave threat to global food security. It is important to adopt the appropriate soil conservation measures to reduce the erosion hazard. In the present study, SWAT model has been applied to study the impact of various best management practices (BMPs) on sediment yield and nutrient losses from a Lower Sutlej River Basin, India. The impact of agricultural and structural BMPs was assessed both individually and in combinations to evaluate the best possible combination of BMPs. Three scenarios, viz., CT1-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CD-BMP-5 + Fertilizer level 1 (Scenario-1), CT<sub>1</sub>-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CB-BMP-3 + CD-BMP-5 + CT<sub>2</sub>-BMP-8 + Fertilizer level 2 (Scenario 2) and CT<sub>1</sub>-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CB-BMP-3 + BT-BMP-4 + CD-BMP-5 + GSS-BMP-6 + SBSS-BMP-7 + CT<sub>2</sub>-BMP-8 + Fertilizer level 3 (Scenario 3) were developed to study their impact on sediment yield and nutrient losses. The average annual sediment yield from watersheds ranges from 3.08 to 21.63 ton/ha/yr for the base scenario (without BMPs), 1.97 to 13.94 ton/ha/yr in scenario 1, 1.66 to 10.77 ton/ha/yr in scenario 2, and 1.04 to 7.78 ton/ha/yr in scenario 3. At the watershed level, the greatest decrease in sediment yield was obtained from check dam (28.72%), followed by bench terracing (25.62%), grade stabilization structures (22.74%), contour bunding (20.88%), stream bank stabilization structures (10.02%), contour trenching (8.99%), conservation tillage (6.66%) and contour farming (4.54%). The use of structural BMPs at the watershed level reduced sediment yields more effectively than agricultural BMPs. The implementation of all the potential BMPs in Scenario 3 minimized sediment yields to the extent of 66.25%. Model simulation demonstrated that a 30% reduction in fertilizer application under fertilizer scenario 3 resulted in the highest reduction in total nitrogen (24.04%), nitrate nitrogen (8.97%), and total phosphorus (11.75%). The study findings may be useful for promoting sustainable land and water resource management at the river basin level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"235 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Efficacy of Best Management Practices in Mitigating Sediment Yield and Nutrient Losses in the Lower Sutlej River Basin, India\",\"authors\":\"Navneet Sharma, Abrar Yousuf, Arun Kaushal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-024-07491-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil erosion is one of the most serious environmental concerns as it threatens the sustainable agriculture and poses a grave threat to global food security. It is important to adopt the appropriate soil conservation measures to reduce the erosion hazard. In the present study, SWAT model has been applied to study the impact of various best management practices (BMPs) on sediment yield and nutrient losses from a Lower Sutlej River Basin, India. The impact of agricultural and structural BMPs was assessed both individually and in combinations to evaluate the best possible combination of BMPs. Three scenarios, viz., CT1-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CD-BMP-5 + Fertilizer level 1 (Scenario-1), CT<sub>1</sub>-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CB-BMP-3 + CD-BMP-5 + CT<sub>2</sub>-BMP-8 + Fertilizer level 2 (Scenario 2) and CT<sub>1</sub>-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CB-BMP-3 + BT-BMP-4 + CD-BMP-5 + GSS-BMP-6 + SBSS-BMP-7 + CT<sub>2</sub>-BMP-8 + Fertilizer level 3 (Scenario 3) were developed to study their impact on sediment yield and nutrient losses. The average annual sediment yield from watersheds ranges from 3.08 to 21.63 ton/ha/yr for the base scenario (without BMPs), 1.97 to 13.94 ton/ha/yr in scenario 1, 1.66 to 10.77 ton/ha/yr in scenario 2, and 1.04 to 7.78 ton/ha/yr in scenario 3. At the watershed level, the greatest decrease in sediment yield was obtained from check dam (28.72%), followed by bench terracing (25.62%), grade stabilization structures (22.74%), contour bunding (20.88%), stream bank stabilization structures (10.02%), contour trenching (8.99%), conservation tillage (6.66%) and contour farming (4.54%). The use of structural BMPs at the watershed level reduced sediment yields more effectively than agricultural BMPs. The implementation of all the potential BMPs in Scenario 3 minimized sediment yields to the extent of 66.25%. Model simulation demonstrated that a 30% reduction in fertilizer application under fertilizer scenario 3 resulted in the highest reduction in total nitrogen (24.04%), nitrate nitrogen (8.97%), and total phosphorus (11.75%). The study findings may be useful for promoting sustainable land and water resource management at the river basin level.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"235 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07491-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07491-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Efficacy of Best Management Practices in Mitigating Sediment Yield and Nutrient Losses in the Lower Sutlej River Basin, India
Soil erosion is one of the most serious environmental concerns as it threatens the sustainable agriculture and poses a grave threat to global food security. It is important to adopt the appropriate soil conservation measures to reduce the erosion hazard. In the present study, SWAT model has been applied to study the impact of various best management practices (BMPs) on sediment yield and nutrient losses from a Lower Sutlej River Basin, India. The impact of agricultural and structural BMPs was assessed both individually and in combinations to evaluate the best possible combination of BMPs. Three scenarios, viz., CT1-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CD-BMP-5 + Fertilizer level 1 (Scenario-1), CT1-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CB-BMP-3 + CD-BMP-5 + CT2-BMP-8 + Fertilizer level 2 (Scenario 2) and CT1-BMP-1 + CF-BMP-2 + CB-BMP-3 + BT-BMP-4 + CD-BMP-5 + GSS-BMP-6 + SBSS-BMP-7 + CT2-BMP-8 + Fertilizer level 3 (Scenario 3) were developed to study their impact on sediment yield and nutrient losses. The average annual sediment yield from watersheds ranges from 3.08 to 21.63 ton/ha/yr for the base scenario (without BMPs), 1.97 to 13.94 ton/ha/yr in scenario 1, 1.66 to 10.77 ton/ha/yr in scenario 2, and 1.04 to 7.78 ton/ha/yr in scenario 3. At the watershed level, the greatest decrease in sediment yield was obtained from check dam (28.72%), followed by bench terracing (25.62%), grade stabilization structures (22.74%), contour bunding (20.88%), stream bank stabilization structures (10.02%), contour trenching (8.99%), conservation tillage (6.66%) and contour farming (4.54%). The use of structural BMPs at the watershed level reduced sediment yields more effectively than agricultural BMPs. The implementation of all the potential BMPs in Scenario 3 minimized sediment yields to the extent of 66.25%. Model simulation demonstrated that a 30% reduction in fertilizer application under fertilizer scenario 3 resulted in the highest reduction in total nitrogen (24.04%), nitrate nitrogen (8.97%), and total phosphorus (11.75%). The study findings may be useful for promoting sustainable land and water resource management at the river basin level.
期刊介绍：
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments.
Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
