{"title":"根据地热系统排放段的温度变化修正地热水的循环深度","authors":"Cuiming Li, Xumei Mao","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The circulation depth of geothermal water providing the geothermal system framework significantly dominates the evaluation of renewal capacity and geothermal resources. The traditional evaluation of circulation depth is based on the groundwater temperature variation in the recharge section and the average geothermal heating rate of geothermal system. However, misunderstanding groundwater temperature distribution in geothermal systems will lead to overestimating groundwater circulation depth based on the recharge section. Temperature measurement in a 1000 m geothermal scientific borehole from the Xinzhou geothermal field of south China is discussed as a case study to reassess the circulation depth of geothermal water. For Xinzhou geothermal system, the recharge and discharge temperatures are from 26.2 °C to 32.6 °C and from 67.0 °C to 98.0 °C, respectively. And the heat exchange temperature at the deepest point is from 121 ℃ to 154 ℃. This indicates that the temperature gradient in the recharge section should be greater than that in the discharge section. But the actual observation is opposite that the temperature gradient in the recharge section and in the discharge section is 3.04 ℃/100 m and 4.97 ℃/100 m, respectively. We proposed that the depth of geothermal water circulation evaluated by the temperature change and the geothermal heating rate in the discharge section represents the top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone, and the depth evaluated by the recharge section represents the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge section. The top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone estimated by the discharge Sect. (0.75–1.49 km) is much shallower than the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge Sect. (3.25–4.34 km). In the convective heat exchange zone (between 4.34 km and 1.49 km), the fault zone at a certain depth is the ideal location for geothermal development to extract water and heat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction of the circulation depth of geothermal water based on temperature variation in the discharge section of geothermal system\",\"authors\":\"Cuiming Li, Xumei Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The circulation depth of geothermal water providing the geothermal system framework significantly dominates the evaluation of renewal capacity and geothermal resources. The traditional evaluation of circulation depth is based on the groundwater temperature variation in the recharge section and the average geothermal heating rate of geothermal system. However, misunderstanding groundwater temperature distribution in geothermal systems will lead to overestimating groundwater circulation depth based on the recharge section. Temperature measurement in a 1000 m geothermal scientific borehole from the Xinzhou geothermal field of south China is discussed as a case study to reassess the circulation depth of geothermal water. For Xinzhou geothermal system, the recharge and discharge temperatures are from 26.2 °C to 32.6 °C and from 67.0 °C to 98.0 °C, respectively. And the heat exchange temperature at the deepest point is from 121 ℃ to 154 ℃. This indicates that the temperature gradient in the recharge section should be greater than that in the discharge section. But the actual observation is opposite that the temperature gradient in the recharge section and in the discharge section is 3.04 ℃/100 m and 4.97 ℃/100 m, respectively. We proposed that the depth of geothermal water circulation evaluated by the temperature change and the geothermal heating rate in the discharge section represents the top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone, and the depth evaluated by the recharge section represents the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge section. The top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone estimated by the discharge Sect. (0.75–1.49 km) is much shallower than the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge Sect. (3.25–4.34 km). In the convective heat exchange zone (between 4.34 km and 1.49 km), the fault zone at a certain depth is the ideal location for geothermal development to extract water and heat.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"83 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correction of the circulation depth of geothermal water based on temperature variation in the discharge section of geothermal system
The circulation depth of geothermal water providing the geothermal system framework significantly dominates the evaluation of renewal capacity and geothermal resources. The traditional evaluation of circulation depth is based on the groundwater temperature variation in the recharge section and the average geothermal heating rate of geothermal system. However, misunderstanding groundwater temperature distribution in geothermal systems will lead to overestimating groundwater circulation depth based on the recharge section. Temperature measurement in a 1000 m geothermal scientific borehole from the Xinzhou geothermal field of south China is discussed as a case study to reassess the circulation depth of geothermal water. For Xinzhou geothermal system, the recharge and discharge temperatures are from 26.2 °C to 32.6 °C and from 67.0 °C to 98.0 °C, respectively. And the heat exchange temperature at the deepest point is from 121 ℃ to 154 ℃. This indicates that the temperature gradient in the recharge section should be greater than that in the discharge section. But the actual observation is opposite that the temperature gradient in the recharge section and in the discharge section is 3.04 ℃/100 m and 4.97 ℃/100 m, respectively. We proposed that the depth of geothermal water circulation evaluated by the temperature change and the geothermal heating rate in the discharge section represents the top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone, and the depth evaluated by the recharge section represents the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge section. The top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone estimated by the discharge Sect. (0.75–1.49 km) is much shallower than the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge Sect. (3.25–4.34 km). In the convective heat exchange zone (between 4.34 km and 1.49 km), the fault zone at a certain depth is the ideal location for geothermal development to extract water and heat.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.