基于多标准决策优化的纤维增强型废陶瓷粉末基土工聚合物:向可持续的净零/低二氧化碳排放建筑材料迈进

IF 4.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Aysen Tahire Kilic, Mucteba Uysal, Beyza Fahriye Aygun, Khizar Nazir, Orhan Canpolat, Hasan Dilbas
{"title":"基于多标准决策优化的纤维增强型废陶瓷粉末基土工聚合物:向可持续的净零/低二氧化碳排放建筑材料迈进","authors":"Aysen Tahire Kilic,&nbsp;Mucteba Uysal,&nbsp;Beyza Fahriye Aygun,&nbsp;Khizar Nazir,&nbsp;Orhan Canpolat,&nbsp;Hasan Dilbas","doi":"10.1007/s43452-024-01052-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, geopolymers (GMs) were produced using basalt fiber, polyamide fiber, and polypropylene fiber-reinforced and ground blast furnace slag (GBFS) waste ceramic powder (WCP). In the initial phase of the study, the optimal ingredient proportions were identified, and an ideal geopolymer was selected based on its highest compressive strength. Subsequently, at the second stage of the study, various fibers with differing proportions were incorporated into the ideal geopolymer, and the resulting properties were evaluated through laboratory testing. In the third stage, the optimal GMs were determined through a holistic approach, employing a multi-criteria decision-making method. A total of ten mixtures, comprising 23 properties (230 parameters in total), were subjected to a multi-criteria decision support method (TOPSIS). The optimal GM mixture with the proportions and suitable components was identified. The findings indicated that a 20% substitution of WCP with GBFS resulted in an optimal and cost-effective mixture in a 10 M NaOH solution, serving as a reference point or ideal unreinforced mixture in this research. With regard to the addition of fibers, all three types of fibers were observed to enhance the compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strength of the WCP–GBFS-based GM. Maximum compressive strength was observed to be 60.15 MPa, while the flexural strength was 12.98 MPa and the splitting tensile strength was 3.45 MPa for the polyamide fiber (PA)-reinforced GM. Furthermore, all reinforced GMs exhibited enhanced abrasion resistance, with the inclusion of polypropylene fibers yielding the best results. Additionally, these fiber-reinforced GMs demonstrated significant resistance to high temperatures, even as temperatures increased. The TOPSIS results indicated that PA0.8 was the optimal GM, and its components with suitable components were recommended as a sustainable net zero/low CO<sub>2</sub> emission building material.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55474,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria decision-making optimization-based fiber-reinforced waste ceramic powder-based geopolymer: toward a sustainable net zero/low CO2 emission building material\",\"authors\":\"Aysen Tahire Kilic,&nbsp;Mucteba Uysal,&nbsp;Beyza Fahriye Aygun,&nbsp;Khizar Nazir,&nbsp;Orhan Canpolat,&nbsp;Hasan Dilbas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43452-024-01052-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, geopolymers (GMs) were produced using basalt fiber, polyamide fiber, and polypropylene fiber-reinforced and ground blast furnace slag (GBFS) waste ceramic powder (WCP). In the initial phase of the study, the optimal ingredient proportions were identified, and an ideal geopolymer was selected based on its highest compressive strength. Subsequently, at the second stage of the study, various fibers with differing proportions were incorporated into the ideal geopolymer, and the resulting properties were evaluated through laboratory testing. In the third stage, the optimal GMs were determined through a holistic approach, employing a multi-criteria decision-making method. A total of ten mixtures, comprising 23 properties (230 parameters in total), were subjected to a multi-criteria decision support method (TOPSIS). The optimal GM mixture with the proportions and suitable components was identified. The findings indicated that a 20% substitution of WCP with GBFS resulted in an optimal and cost-effective mixture in a 10 M NaOH solution, serving as a reference point or ideal unreinforced mixture in this research. With regard to the addition of fibers, all three types of fibers were observed to enhance the compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strength of the WCP–GBFS-based GM. Maximum compressive strength was observed to be 60.15 MPa, while the flexural strength was 12.98 MPa and the splitting tensile strength was 3.45 MPa for the polyamide fiber (PA)-reinforced GM. Furthermore, all reinforced GMs exhibited enhanced abrasion resistance, with the inclusion of polypropylene fibers yielding the best results. Additionally, these fiber-reinforced GMs demonstrated significant resistance to high temperatures, even as temperatures increased. The TOPSIS results indicated that PA0.8 was the optimal GM, and its components with suitable components were recommended as a sustainable net zero/low CO<sub>2</sub> emission building material.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43452-024-01052-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43452-024-01052-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,使用玄武岩纤维、聚酰胺纤维和聚丙烯纤维增强和研磨高炉矿渣(GBFS)废陶瓷粉(WCP)生产了土工聚合物(GMs)。在研究的初始阶段,确定了最佳成分比例,并根据其最高抗压强度选择了理想的土工聚合物。随后,在研究的第二阶段,在理想的土工聚合物中加入了不同比例的各种纤维,并通过实验室测试对其性能进行了评估。在第三阶段,采用多标准决策法,通过综合方法确定了最佳土工聚合物。多标准决策支持法(TOPSIS)共对包含 23 种特性(共 230 个参数)的 10 种混合物进行了评估。确定了最佳的 GM 混合物比例和合适的成分。研究结果表明,在 10 M NaOH 溶液中,用 GBFS 替代 20% 的 WCP 可得到成本效益最佳的混合物,可作为本研究的参考点或理想的非增强混合物。在添加纤维方面,观察到所有三种类型的纤维都能增强基于 WCP-GBFS 的 GM 的抗压、抗弯和劈裂拉伸强度。据观察,聚酰胺纤维(PA)增强的基因改造材料的最大抗压强度为 60.15 兆帕,抗弯强度为 12.98 兆帕,劈裂拉伸强度为 3.45 兆帕。此外,所有增强型基因改造材料都表现出更强的耐磨性,其中聚丙烯纤维的效果最好。此外,即使温度升高,这些纤维增强的基因改造材料也具有显著的耐高温性能。TOPSIS 结果表明,PA0.8 是最佳的全球机制材料,建议将其与合适的成分组合成可持续的净零/低 CO2 排放建筑材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-criteria decision-making optimization-based fiber-reinforced waste ceramic powder-based geopolymer: toward a sustainable net zero/low CO2 emission building material

In this study, geopolymers (GMs) were produced using basalt fiber, polyamide fiber, and polypropylene fiber-reinforced and ground blast furnace slag (GBFS) waste ceramic powder (WCP). In the initial phase of the study, the optimal ingredient proportions were identified, and an ideal geopolymer was selected based on its highest compressive strength. Subsequently, at the second stage of the study, various fibers with differing proportions were incorporated into the ideal geopolymer, and the resulting properties were evaluated through laboratory testing. In the third stage, the optimal GMs were determined through a holistic approach, employing a multi-criteria decision-making method. A total of ten mixtures, comprising 23 properties (230 parameters in total), were subjected to a multi-criteria decision support method (TOPSIS). The optimal GM mixture with the proportions and suitable components was identified. The findings indicated that a 20% substitution of WCP with GBFS resulted in an optimal and cost-effective mixture in a 10 M NaOH solution, serving as a reference point or ideal unreinforced mixture in this research. With regard to the addition of fibers, all three types of fibers were observed to enhance the compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strength of the WCP–GBFS-based GM. Maximum compressive strength was observed to be 60.15 MPa, while the flexural strength was 12.98 MPa and the splitting tensile strength was 3.45 MPa for the polyamide fiber (PA)-reinforced GM. Furthermore, all reinforced GMs exhibited enhanced abrasion resistance, with the inclusion of polypropylene fibers yielding the best results. Additionally, these fiber-reinforced GMs demonstrated significant resistance to high temperatures, even as temperatures increased. The TOPSIS results indicated that PA0.8 was the optimal GM, and its components with suitable components were recommended as a sustainable net zero/low CO2 emission building material.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
201
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering (ACME) publishes both theoretical and experimental original research articles which explore or exploit new ideas and techniques in three main areas: structural engineering, mechanics of materials and materials science. The aim of the journal is to advance science related to structural engineering focusing on structures, machines and mechanical systems. The journal also promotes advancement in the area of mechanics of materials, by publishing most recent findings in elasticity, plasticity, rheology, fatigue and fracture mechanics. The third area the journal is concentrating on is materials science, with emphasis on metals, composites, etc., their structures and properties as well as methods of evaluation. In addition to research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes state-of-the-art reviews on specialized topics. All such articles have to be sent to the Editor-in-Chief before submission for pre-submission review process. Only articles approved by the Editor-in-Chief in pre-submission process can be submitted to the journal for further processing. Approval in pre-submission stage doesn''t guarantee acceptance for publication as all papers are subject to a regular referee procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信