{"title":"评估口腔修复患者的人格风险特征:德尔菲驱动的分类方法。","authors":"Jorge Jofré, Ricardo Cartes-Velasquez, Josephine Scott, Claudia Asenjo-Lobos","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify specific personality traits that could potentially undermine the overall satisfaction of the patient with the prosthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to identify the personality traits (PTs) relevant to patients requiring dental treatment. Later, a Delphi process was employed to classify the selected PTs into their levels of risk to prosthodontic treatment satisfaction, ultimately leading to the development of a personality risk profile (PRP) proposal. The expert panel consisted of specialists with over 10 years of practice experience. The Delphi process involved three rounds of evaluation and consensus building.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 26 PTs associated with dental treatment satisfaction were identified. Following the three rounds of the Delphi method, a consensus was achieved, resulting in the classification of these PTs into three PRPs, as follows: low risk (Cooperative, Understanding, Compliant, Trusting, Concerned about their health, Willing, Grateful, and Responsible); moderate risk (Insecure, Overinformed, Demanding, Appearance-obsessed, and Pessimistic); and high risk (Mistrustful, Skeptical, Unwilling, Defiant attitude, Unrealistic expectations, Neglectful, Treatment-resistant, Patient speaks. negatively about other dentists, Violent, Irresponsible, Idealize the dentist, and Controller).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified and categorized PTs that have the potential to adversely impact prosthodontic treatment satisfaction. Through this PRP proposal, dental professionals can recognize these patients before initiating prosthodontic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Personality Risk Profiles in Prosthodontics Patients: A Delphi-Driven Classification Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Jofré, Ricardo Cartes-Velasquez, Josephine Scott, Claudia Asenjo-Lobos\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.9145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify specific personality traits that could potentially undermine the overall satisfaction of the patient with the prosthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to identify the personality traits (PTs) relevant to patients requiring dental treatment. Later, a Delphi process was employed to classify the selected PTs into their levels of risk to prosthodontic treatment satisfaction, ultimately leading to the development of a personality risk profile (PRP) proposal. The expert panel consisted of specialists with over 10 years of practice experience. The Delphi process involved three rounds of evaluation and consensus building.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 26 PTs associated with dental treatment satisfaction were identified. Following the three rounds of the Delphi method, a consensus was achieved, resulting in the classification of these PTs into three PRPs, as follows: low risk (Cooperative, Understanding, Compliant, Trusting, Concerned about their health, Willing, Grateful, and Responsible); moderate risk (Insecure, Overinformed, Demanding, Appearance-obsessed, and Pessimistic); and high risk (Mistrustful, Skeptical, Unwilling, Defiant attitude, Unrealistic expectations, Neglectful, Treatment-resistant, Patient speaks. negatively about other dentists, Violent, Irresponsible, Idealize the dentist, and Controller).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified and categorized PTs that have the potential to adversely impact prosthodontic treatment satisfaction. Through this PRP proposal, dental professionals can recognize these patients before initiating prosthodontic interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"391-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing Personality Risk Profiles in Prosthodontics Patients: A Delphi-Driven Classification Approach.
Purpose: To identify specific personality traits that could potentially undermine the overall satisfaction of the patient with the prosthodontic treatment.
Materials and methods: A literature review was conducted to identify the personality traits (PTs) relevant to patients requiring dental treatment. Later, a Delphi process was employed to classify the selected PTs into their levels of risk to prosthodontic treatment satisfaction, ultimately leading to the development of a personality risk profile (PRP) proposal. The expert panel consisted of specialists with over 10 years of practice experience. The Delphi process involved three rounds of evaluation and consensus building.
Results: In total, 26 PTs associated with dental treatment satisfaction were identified. Following the three rounds of the Delphi method, a consensus was achieved, resulting in the classification of these PTs into three PRPs, as follows: low risk (Cooperative, Understanding, Compliant, Trusting, Concerned about their health, Willing, Grateful, and Responsible); moderate risk (Insecure, Overinformed, Demanding, Appearance-obsessed, and Pessimistic); and high risk (Mistrustful, Skeptical, Unwilling, Defiant attitude, Unrealistic expectations, Neglectful, Treatment-resistant, Patient speaks. negatively about other dentists, Violent, Irresponsible, Idealize the dentist, and Controller).
Conclusions: This study identified and categorized PTs that have the potential to adversely impact prosthodontic treatment satisfaction. Through this PRP proposal, dental professionals can recognize these patients before initiating prosthodontic interventions.