Madhav Chowdhry , Matthew V. Dipane , Stephen T. Duncan , Diego Pena , Alexandra Stavrakis , Edward J. McPherson
{"title":"下一代测序发现,在使用生物膜破坏灌洗剂的感染性 TKA 患者灌洗后标本中,微生物的多样性有所增加。","authors":"Madhav Chowdhry , Matthew V. Dipane , Stephen T. Duncan , Diego Pena , Alexandra Stavrakis , Edward J. McPherson","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty. In chronic PJI, a biofilm envelops the surface of implants, which contains microbiota within an extra-microbial polymeric matrix (EMPM). Microbial identification is paramount for effective treatment. In this study, we use a multi-modal, EMPM disrupting, neoadjuvant irrigant and compare the microbiota detected pre-lavage to post-lavage by two techniques: culture and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). We suspect more organisms to be identified after applying an EMPM disrupting irrigant.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicenter, prospective study was conducted on 38 patients with known Total Knee Arthroplasty PJI. At initial arthrotomy, synovial fluid was obtained and analyzed for quantitative cultures and microbial NGS. Joint was then irrigated with Bactisure Lavage followed by Normal Saline. Post-lavage samples were similarly obtained and analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In pre-lavage samples for cultures, 55.3% of samples were positive, identifying 11 unique organisms. In post-lavage samples for cultures, 13.2% of samples were positive, identifying 5 unique organisms. In pre-lavage samples for NGS, 79% were DNA signal positive, identifying 126 unique organisms. In post-lavage samples for NGS, 74% of samples were DNA signal positive, identifying 177 unique organisms. Moreover, 135/177 of these organisms were not identified pre-lavage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this pre-to-post irrigant study, culture showed a decrease in the number of identifiable organisms post-lavage. In contrast NGS revealed an increase in the number of identifiable organisms post-lavage. Furthermore, NGS identified 135 additional organisms, not detected pre-lavage. This suggests an increased diversity of microbes may exist within EMPM, which are not cultivable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"51 ","pages":"Pages 231-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next generation sequencing identifies an increased diversity of microbes in post lavage specimens in infected TKA using a biofilm disrupting irrigant\",\"authors\":\"Madhav Chowdhry , Matthew V. Dipane , Stephen T. Duncan , Diego Pena , Alexandra Stavrakis , Edward J. McPherson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty. In chronic PJI, a biofilm envelops the surface of implants, which contains microbiota within an extra-microbial polymeric matrix (EMPM). Microbial identification is paramount for effective treatment. In this study, we use a multi-modal, EMPM disrupting, neoadjuvant irrigant and compare the microbiota detected pre-lavage to post-lavage by two techniques: culture and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). We suspect more organisms to be identified after applying an EMPM disrupting irrigant.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicenter, prospective study was conducted on 38 patients with known Total Knee Arthroplasty PJI. At initial arthrotomy, synovial fluid was obtained and analyzed for quantitative cultures and microbial NGS. Joint was then irrigated with Bactisure Lavage followed by Normal Saline. Post-lavage samples were similarly obtained and analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In pre-lavage samples for cultures, 55.3% of samples were positive, identifying 11 unique organisms. In post-lavage samples for cultures, 13.2% of samples were positive, identifying 5 unique organisms. In pre-lavage samples for NGS, 79% were DNA signal positive, identifying 126 unique organisms. In post-lavage samples for NGS, 74% of samples were DNA signal positive, identifying 177 unique organisms. Moreover, 135/177 of these organisms were not identified pre-lavage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this pre-to-post irrigant study, culture showed a decrease in the number of identifiable organisms post-lavage. In contrast NGS revealed an increase in the number of identifiable organisms post-lavage. Furthermore, NGS identified 135 additional organisms, not detected pre-lavage. This suggests an increased diversity of microbes may exist within EMPM, which are not cultivable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 231-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Next generation sequencing identifies an increased diversity of microbes in post lavage specimens in infected TKA using a biofilm disrupting irrigant
Background
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty. In chronic PJI, a biofilm envelops the surface of implants, which contains microbiota within an extra-microbial polymeric matrix (EMPM). Microbial identification is paramount for effective treatment. In this study, we use a multi-modal, EMPM disrupting, neoadjuvant irrigant and compare the microbiota detected pre-lavage to post-lavage by two techniques: culture and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). We suspect more organisms to be identified after applying an EMPM disrupting irrigant.
Methods
A multicenter, prospective study was conducted on 38 patients with known Total Knee Arthroplasty PJI. At initial arthrotomy, synovial fluid was obtained and analyzed for quantitative cultures and microbial NGS. Joint was then irrigated with Bactisure Lavage followed by Normal Saline. Post-lavage samples were similarly obtained and analyzed.
Results
In pre-lavage samples for cultures, 55.3% of samples were positive, identifying 11 unique organisms. In post-lavage samples for cultures, 13.2% of samples were positive, identifying 5 unique organisms. In pre-lavage samples for NGS, 79% were DNA signal positive, identifying 126 unique organisms. In post-lavage samples for NGS, 74% of samples were DNA signal positive, identifying 177 unique organisms. Moreover, 135/177 of these organisms were not identified pre-lavage.
Conclusion
In this pre-to-post irrigant study, culture showed a decrease in the number of identifiable organisms post-lavage. In contrast NGS revealed an increase in the number of identifiable organisms post-lavage. Furthermore, NGS identified 135 additional organisms, not detected pre-lavage. This suggests an increased diversity of microbes may exist within EMPM, which are not cultivable.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.