慢性静脉阻塞患者髂股动脉支架植入术分类系统的预后价值

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Houman Jalaie, Mohammad E Barbati, Long Piao, Suat Doganci, Nils Kucher, Mert Dumantepe, Olivier Hartung, Michael Lichtenberg, Stephen Black, Gerard O'Sullivan, Efthymios D Avgerinos, Alun Davies, Mahmood K Razavi
{"title":"慢性静脉阻塞患者髂股动脉支架植入术分类系统的预后价值","authors":"Houman Jalaie, Mohammad E Barbati, Long Piao, Suat Doganci, Nils Kucher, Mert Dumantepe, Olivier Hartung, Michael Lichtenberg, Stephen Black, Gerard O'Sullivan, Efthymios D Avgerinos, Alun Davies, Mahmood K Razavi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective, multicentre study aimed to assess the prognostic value of a proposed classification system for chronic venous obstruction (CVO) patients undergoing successful interventional procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analysed data from 13 vascular centres, including 1 033 patients with CVO treated between 2015 - 2019. The patients were classified into five category types: 1 - non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion; 2 - CVO of iliac segment; 3 - CVO of iliofemoral segment above common femoral vein confluence; 4 - CVO of iliofemoral segment extending into the femoral vein (FV) or deep femoral vein (DFV); and 5 - CVO of iliofemoral segment involving both DFV and FV. Stent deployment, complications, and follow ups were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of primary patency loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the patients was 44.0 ± 14.7 years, with 59.9% being women. A median of two stents were used for unilateral cases and five stents for bilateral cases. At 12 months of follow up, primary patency rates for types 1 - 5 were 94.9%, 90.3%, 80.8%, 60.6%, and 39.4%, respectively. These rates were strongly correlated with the extension of CVO and showed significant differences between each type. Univariate analysis identified predictors of primary patency loss as the type of CVO, history of deep vein thrombosis, and the total number of stents. In the multivariate analysis, the significant independent predictors of primary patency loss were the type of CVO and the total number of stents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed anatomical classification of iliofemoral CVO will help to predict intervention outcomes and facilitate comparison of stent outcomes in future studies. However, further evaluation and validation in prospective studies are needed to confirm the utility of this classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Value of a Classification System for Iliofemoral Stenting in Patients with Chronic Venous Obstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Houman Jalaie, Mohammad E Barbati, Long Piao, Suat Doganci, Nils Kucher, Mert Dumantepe, Olivier Hartung, Michael Lichtenberg, Stephen Black, Gerard O'Sullivan, Efthymios D Avgerinos, Alun Davies, Mahmood K Razavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective, multicentre study aimed to assess the prognostic value of a proposed classification system for chronic venous obstruction (CVO) patients undergoing successful interventional procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analysed data from 13 vascular centres, including 1 033 patients with CVO treated between 2015 - 2019. The patients were classified into five category types: 1 - non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion; 2 - CVO of iliac segment; 3 - CVO of iliofemoral segment above common femoral vein confluence; 4 - CVO of iliofemoral segment extending into the femoral vein (FV) or deep femoral vein (DFV); and 5 - CVO of iliofemoral segment involving both DFV and FV. Stent deployment, complications, and follow ups were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of primary patency loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the patients was 44.0 ± 14.7 years, with 59.9% being women. A median of two stents were used for unilateral cases and five stents for bilateral cases. At 12 months of follow up, primary patency rates for types 1 - 5 were 94.9%, 90.3%, 80.8%, 60.6%, and 39.4%, respectively. These rates were strongly correlated with the extension of CVO and showed significant differences between each type. Univariate analysis identified predictors of primary patency loss as the type of CVO, history of deep vein thrombosis, and the total number of stents. In the multivariate analysis, the significant independent predictors of primary patency loss were the type of CVO and the total number of stents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed anatomical classification of iliofemoral CVO will help to predict intervention outcomes and facilitate comparison of stent outcomes in future studies. However, further evaluation and validation in prospective studies are needed to confirm the utility of this classification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的这项多中心回顾性研究旨在评估针对成功接受介入手术的慢性静脉阻塞(CVO)患者提出的分类系统的预后价值:本研究分析了来自13个血管中心的数据,包括2015-2019年间接受治疗的1 033名CVO患者。患者被分为五类:1-非血栓性髂静脉病变;2-髂段CVO;3-股总静脉汇合处以上的髂股段CVO;4-延伸至股静脉(FV)或股深静脉(DFV)的髂股段CVO;5-同时涉及DFV和FV的髂股段CVO。对支架部署、并发症和随访进行了评估。进行了单变量和多变量分析,以确定主要通畅损失的预测因素:患者的平均年龄为(44.0 ± 14.7)岁,59.9%为女性。单侧病例使用的支架中位数为两个,双侧病例使用的支架中位数为五个。在 12 个月的随访中,1-5 型支架的初次通畅率分别为 94.9%、90.3%、80.8%、60.6% 和 39.4%。这些比率与 CVO 的扩展密切相关,并且每种类型之间存在显著差异。单变量分析发现,CVO 类型、深静脉血栓病史和支架总数是主要通畅损失的预测因素。在多变量分析中,CVO类型和支架总数是主要通畅损失的重要独立预测因素:结论:所提出的髂股动脉CVO解剖学分类有助于预测介入治疗的结果,并便于在未来的研究中比较支架的效果。然而,还需要在前瞻性研究中进行进一步评估和验证,以确认该分类的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Value of a Classification System for Iliofemoral Stenting in Patients with Chronic Venous Obstruction.

Objective: This retrospective, multicentre study aimed to assess the prognostic value of a proposed classification system for chronic venous obstruction (CVO) patients undergoing successful interventional procedures.

Methods: This study analysed data from 13 vascular centres, including 1 033 patients with CVO treated between 2015 - 2019. The patients were classified into five category types: 1 - non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion; 2 - CVO of iliac segment; 3 - CVO of iliofemoral segment above common femoral vein confluence; 4 - CVO of iliofemoral segment extending into the femoral vein (FV) or deep femoral vein (DFV); and 5 - CVO of iliofemoral segment involving both DFV and FV. Stent deployment, complications, and follow ups were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of primary patency loss.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 44.0 ± 14.7 years, with 59.9% being women. A median of two stents were used for unilateral cases and five stents for bilateral cases. At 12 months of follow up, primary patency rates for types 1 - 5 were 94.9%, 90.3%, 80.8%, 60.6%, and 39.4%, respectively. These rates were strongly correlated with the extension of CVO and showed significant differences between each type. Univariate analysis identified predictors of primary patency loss as the type of CVO, history of deep vein thrombosis, and the total number of stents. In the multivariate analysis, the significant independent predictors of primary patency loss were the type of CVO and the total number of stents.

Conclusion: The proposed anatomical classification of iliofemoral CVO will help to predict intervention outcomes and facilitate comparison of stent outcomes in future studies. However, further evaluation and validation in prospective studies are needed to confirm the utility of this classification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信