验证土耳其语语音质量指数 03.01 版。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Gamze Yeşilli-Puzella, Youri Maryn, Aylin Müge Tunçer, Sevtap Akbulut, Elif Meryem Ünsal, Elçin Tadıhan Özkan
{"title":"验证土耳其语语音质量指数 03.01 版。","authors":"Gamze Yeşilli-Puzella, Youri Maryn, Aylin Müge Tunçer, Sevtap Akbulut, Elif Meryem Ünsal, Elçin Tadıhan Özkan","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) version 3.01 in the Turkish-speaking population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Concatenated voice samples of the sustained vowel [a:] and continuous speech were collected from 127 dysphonic and 128 normophonic participants. The auditory-perceptual evaluation was performed by five experienced raters using the Grade parameter of the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain scale. Rater reliability, concurrent validity, diagnostic accuracy, and differences between normophonic and dysphonic groups were analyzed for the AVQI version 3.01.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of syllables for the standardized reading text with the concatenation of the voiced parts lasting around 3 seconds (mean = 3.84 seconds) was 36. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of intra-rater reliability of G scores of five raters were excellent (mean ICC = 0.934), and of inter-rater reliability, they varied between moderate and excellent (mean ICC = 0.786). AVQIv3 demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy with area under receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.906 in identifying disrupted versus normal voice quality. With sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 94%, AVQIv3 = 2.345 was the cutoff point that differentiated most accurately between normophonic and dysphonic voices in Turkish.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVQIv3 is an ecologically valid tool for objective differentiation between dysphonic and normal voices in the Turkish language.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 in Turkish.\",\"authors\":\"Gamze Yeşilli-Puzella, Youri Maryn, Aylin Müge Tunçer, Sevtap Akbulut, Elif Meryem Ünsal, Elçin Tadıhan Özkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) version 3.01 in the Turkish-speaking population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Concatenated voice samples of the sustained vowel [a:] and continuous speech were collected from 127 dysphonic and 128 normophonic participants. The auditory-perceptual evaluation was performed by five experienced raters using the Grade parameter of the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain scale. Rater reliability, concurrent validity, diagnostic accuracy, and differences between normophonic and dysphonic groups were analyzed for the AVQI version 3.01.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of syllables for the standardized reading text with the concatenation of the voiced parts lasting around 3 seconds (mean = 3.84 seconds) was 36. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of intra-rater reliability of G scores of five raters were excellent (mean ICC = 0.934), and of inter-rater reliability, they varied between moderate and excellent (mean ICC = 0.786). AVQIv3 demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy with area under receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.906 in identifying disrupted versus normal voice quality. With sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 94%, AVQIv3 = 2.345 was the cutoff point that differentiated most accurately between normophonic and dysphonic voices in Turkish.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVQIv3 is an ecologically valid tool for objective differentiation between dysphonic and normal voices in the Turkish language.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是在讲土耳其语的人群中验证 3.01 版声学嗓音质量指数 (AVQI):收集了 127 名发音障碍者和 128 名正常发音者的持续元音 [a:] 和连续语音的合并语音样本。由五位经验丰富的评分员使用等级、粗糙度、呼吸感、气喘、紧张量表中的等级参数进行听觉感知评估。对 AVQI 3.01 版的评分者可靠性、并发有效性、诊断准确性以及正常嗓音组和发音障碍组之间的差异进行了分析:标准阅读文本的音节数为 36 个,发声部分的连读时间约为 3 秒(平均值 = 3.84 秒)。五位评分者 G 评分的评分者内部信度的类内相关系数(ICC)值为极好(平均 ICC = 0.934),评分者之间的信度介于中等和极好之间(平均 ICC = 0.786)。AVQIv3 的诊断准确率很高,其接收器工作特征曲线下面积 = 0.906,可识别嗓音质量紊乱与正常。AVQIv3 = 2.345 是区分土耳其语正常嗓音和发音障碍嗓音最准确的临界点,灵敏度为 80%,特异度为 94%:AVQIv3 是客观区分土耳其语发音障碍和正常嗓音的生态有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 in Turkish.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to validate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) version 3.01 in the Turkish-speaking population.

Materials and methods: Concatenated voice samples of the sustained vowel [a:] and continuous speech were collected from 127 dysphonic and 128 normophonic participants. The auditory-perceptual evaluation was performed by five experienced raters using the Grade parameter of the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain scale. Rater reliability, concurrent validity, diagnostic accuracy, and differences between normophonic and dysphonic groups were analyzed for the AVQI version 3.01.

Results: The number of syllables for the standardized reading text with the concatenation of the voiced parts lasting around 3 seconds (mean = 3.84 seconds) was 36. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of intra-rater reliability of G scores of five raters were excellent (mean ICC = 0.934), and of inter-rater reliability, they varied between moderate and excellent (mean ICC = 0.786). AVQIv3 demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy with area under receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.906 in identifying disrupted versus normal voice quality. With sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 94%, AVQIv3 = 2.345 was the cutoff point that differentiated most accurately between normophonic and dysphonic voices in Turkish.

Conclusion: AVQIv3 is an ecologically valid tool for objective differentiation between dysphonic and normal voices in the Turkish language.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信