用于经皮椎弓根螺钉置入的新型先导孔制备系统 - 一项随机对照研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005184
Chaobo Feng, Longfei Wang, Sheng Yang, Xinbo Wu, Yunshan Fan, Huang Yan, Fangjing Chen, Jia Chen, Xiang Wang, Qishuai Guo, Longxiang Yao, Yingchuan Zhao, Shisheng He, Haijian Ni
{"title":"用于经皮椎弓根螺钉置入的新型先导孔制备系统 - 一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Chaobo Feng, Longfei Wang, Sheng Yang, Xinbo Wu, Yunshan Fan, Huang Yan, Fangjing Chen, Jia Chen, Xiang Wang, Qishuai Guo, Longxiang Yao, Yingchuan Zhao, Shisheng He, Haijian Ni","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To introduce a new pilot hole preparation system for percutaneous pedicle screw placement and investigate its efficiency and safety in comparison with the conventional method.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Placing screws accurately, rapidly, and safely with less radiation exposure is critical for minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Optimizing pilot hole preparation instruments has important clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 60 patients (180 screws) were included in this study. All patients were randomized into two groups (new system vs. conventional method) and performed single-level minimally invasive percutaneous fixation, interbody fusion, and unilateral decompression. Basic information, time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Screw placement accuracy was graded based on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, and the angle between the screw axis and the pedicle axis was collected in postoperative CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in basic information between the 2 groups. The mean time of single pilot hole preparation was 4.08±1.01 minutes in the new system group and 5.34±1.30 minutes in the conventional method group ( P <0.001). The time of single screw placement was significantly shorter in the new system group (0.82±0.20 vs. 1.72±0.33 min), and the fluoroscopy time was also less in the new system group (13.70±3.42 vs. 19.95±5.50 s) ( P <0.001). Screw placement accuracy assessment showed that there were 85 (94.45%) A-grade screws in the new system group while 76 (84.44%) A-grade screws in the conventional method group ( P =0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new pilot hole preparation system has shown significant reductions in the time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and radiation exposure, and has good clinical application value.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"115-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Pilot Hole Preparation System for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: A Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Chaobo Feng, Longfei Wang, Sheng Yang, Xinbo Wu, Yunshan Fan, Huang Yan, Fangjing Chen, Jia Chen, Xiang Wang, Qishuai Guo, Longxiang Yao, Yingchuan Zhao, Shisheng He, Haijian Ni\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To introduce a new pilot hole preparation system for percutaneous pedicle screw placement and investigate its efficiency and safety in comparison with the conventional method.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Placing screws accurately, rapidly, and safely with less radiation exposure is critical for minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Optimizing pilot hole preparation instruments has important clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 60 patients (180 screws) were included in this study. All patients were randomized into two groups (new system vs. conventional method) and performed single-level minimally invasive percutaneous fixation, interbody fusion, and unilateral decompression. Basic information, time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Screw placement accuracy was graded based on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, and the angle between the screw axis and the pedicle axis was collected in postoperative CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in basic information between the 2 groups. The mean time of single pilot hole preparation was 4.08±1.01 minutes in the new system group and 5.34±1.30 minutes in the conventional method group ( P <0.001). The time of single screw placement was significantly shorter in the new system group (0.82±0.20 vs. 1.72±0.33 min), and the fluoroscopy time was also less in the new system group (13.70±3.42 vs. 19.95±5.50 s) ( P <0.001). Screw placement accuracy assessment showed that there were 85 (94.45%) A-grade screws in the new system group while 76 (84.44%) A-grade screws in the conventional method group ( P =0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new pilot hole preparation system has shown significant reductions in the time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and radiation exposure, and has good clinical application value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计随机对照研究:引入一种用于经皮椎弓根螺钉置入的新型先导孔准备系统,并研究其与传统方法相比的效率和安全性:准确、快速、安全地植入螺钉并减少辐射暴露对于微创腰椎椎间融合术(LIF)至关重要。优化先导孔准备器械具有重要的临床意义:本研究共纳入 60 名患者(180 枚螺钉)。所有患者随机分为两组(新系统与传统方法),分别进行单层微创经皮固定、椎间融合和单侧减压。记录基本信息、先导孔准备时间、螺钉置入时间和透视时间。根据 Gertzbein-Robbins 量表对螺钉置入的准确性进行评分,并在术后 CT 中收集螺钉轴线与椎弓根轴线之间的角度:两组患者的基本信息无统计学差异。新系统组的单个先导孔准备平均时间为(4.08±1.01)分钟,而传统方法组为(5.34±1.30)分钟(PC结论:新先导孔准备系统在椎弓根手术中表现出了良好的性能:新型先导孔制备系统显著减少了先导孔制备时间、螺钉置入时间和辐射暴露,具有良好的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Pilot Hole Preparation System for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Study design: A randomized controlled study.

Objective: To introduce a new pilot hole preparation system for percutaneous pedicle screw placement and investigate its efficiency and safety in comparison with the conventional method.

Summary of background data: Placing screws accurately, rapidly, and safely with less radiation exposure is critical for minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Optimizing pilot hole preparation instruments has important clinical implications.

Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients (180 screws) were included in this study. All patients were randomized into two groups (new system vs. conventional method) and performed single-level minimally invasive percutaneous fixation, interbody fusion, and unilateral decompression. Basic information, time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Screw placement accuracy was graded based on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, and the angle between the screw axis and the pedicle axis was collected in postoperative CT.

Results: There was no statistical difference in basic information between the 2 groups. The mean time of single pilot hole preparation was 4.08±1.01 minutes in the new system group and 5.34±1.30 minutes in the conventional method group ( P <0.001). The time of single screw placement was significantly shorter in the new system group (0.82±0.20 vs. 1.72±0.33 min), and the fluoroscopy time was also less in the new system group (13.70±3.42 vs. 19.95±5.50 s) ( P <0.001). Screw placement accuracy assessment showed that there were 85 (94.45%) A-grade screws in the new system group while 76 (84.44%) A-grade screws in the conventional method group ( P =0.027).

Conclusions: The new pilot hole preparation system has shown significant reductions in the time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and radiation exposure, and has good clinical application value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信