成人使用 Omnipod 5 一年后的疗效:来自英国糖尿病中心的真实数据。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Roland H. Stimson, Mark W. J. Strachan, Anna R. Dover, Rohana J. Wright, Shareen Forbes, Gayle McRobert, Fraser W. Gibb
{"title":"成人使用 Omnipod 5 一年后的疗效:来自英国糖尿病中心的真实数据。","authors":"Roland H. Stimson,&nbsp;Mark W. J. Strachan,&nbsp;Anna R. Dover,&nbsp;Rohana J. Wright,&nbsp;Shareen Forbes,&nbsp;Gayle McRobert,&nbsp;Fraser W. Gibb","doi":"10.1111/dme.15453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite substantial advances in diabetes care over the previous decade, only a minority of people with type 1 diabetes achieve an HbA1c &lt;53 mmol/mol.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have consistently demonstrated efficacy in reducing HbA1c.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Omnipod 5 (Insulet Corp) is a tubeless AID system which was launched in the United Kingdom in 2023. Here, we report the first 1-year CGM, HbA1c and weight outcomes in people using Omnipod 5, under routine clinical care, in the United Kingdom.</p><p>This was a prospective, observational assessment based in a single Scottish centre which provides diabetes care for approximately 5000 adults with type 1 diabetes. As a service evaluation of routinely collected data, this project did not require ethical approval. We included all adults who transitioned from Omnipod DASH (standalone CSII) to Omnipod 5 (hybrid closed loop with Dexcom G6 CGM) between June and August 2023. Data were obtained from the electronic health record (SCI-Diabetes), LibreView, Dexcom Clarity and Glooko.</p><p>Paired CGM data were available in 45/50 (90 days prior to Omnipod 5 and 90 days after 1 year of use) and paired HbA1c data were available in 41/50 (measured at a median 200 days [202–336] after OP5 commencement). CGM metrics reported are consistent with those described in the international consensus document.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Paired weight data were available in 28/50 (median 308 days after OP5 commencement [244–370]). Results are presented as median (IQR). Paired data were compared with Wilcoxon signed rank tests and correlations were assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. <i>p</i> &lt;0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio.</p><p>Median age was 42 years (IQR: 30–53), duration of diabetes was 24 years (13–34) and 64% were female. Baseline HbA1c was 69 mmol/mol (61–75) and 22% had an HbA1c &lt;58 mmol/mol. Thirty-eight per cent had BMI &gt;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Fifty-nine per cent were predominantly using the lowest glucose target (6.1 mM) at the end of follow-up and median time in auto mode was 94% (91–99).</p><p>In those with paired HbA1c data, median baseline HbA1c was 70 mmol/mol (63–76) and fell to 58 mmol/mol (52–63) during Omnipod 5 use (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Data summarising CGM changes are presented in the figure (Figure 1), including a change in TIR from 42% (33–58) to 60% (53–68, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). GMI fell from 66 mmol/mol (57–70) to 58 mmol/mol (54–62, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and coefficient of variation for glucose fell from 37% (34–42) to 34% (32–38, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Change in TIR at 1 year was strongly negatively correlated with baseline TIR (<i>R</i> −0.581, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Percentage of insulin delivered as bolus was negatively correlated with increase in TIR (<i>R</i> −0.518, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Age, sex and socio-economic deprivation were not associated with TIR response to Omnipod 5.</p><p>Median weight change was +2.3 kg (−1.3 to 3.8) or + 3.0% of baseline weight (−1.6 to 5.2). Weight change was not associated with change in HbA1c (<i>R</i> 0.115, <i>p</i> = 0.560) or TIR (<i>R</i> −0.101, <i>p</i> = 0.607).</p><p>We have shown that Omnipod 5 is associated with clinically important improvement in TIR with no increase in TBR. Our cohort differs from other evaluations of Omnipod 5<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> as the baseline HbA1c of participants was relatively high. Those with lowest TIR (highest HbA1c) are most likely to experience substantial increases in TIR when converting from standalone CSII to Omnipod 5. Individuals where bolus insulin was lowest (in relation to basal insulin) experienced the largest improvements in TIR; suggesting the system is effective in those who have historically delivered insufficient insulin doses at mealtimes. Reassuringly, weight gain was typically modest and not associated with improvements in HbA1c or TIR. This is the first real-world assessment of 1-year outcomes with Omnipod 5 in the United Kingdom and attests to the durability of improvements observed shortly after commencement.</p><p>No funding source to report.</p><p>FWG has received speaker fees from Abbott, Dexcom and Insulet. ARD has received speaker fees from Abbott.</p>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":"41 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.15453","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes after 1 year in adults using Omnipod 5: Real-world data from a UK diabetes centre\",\"authors\":\"Roland H. Stimson,&nbsp;Mark W. J. Strachan,&nbsp;Anna R. Dover,&nbsp;Rohana J. Wright,&nbsp;Shareen Forbes,&nbsp;Gayle McRobert,&nbsp;Fraser W. Gibb\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.15453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite substantial advances in diabetes care over the previous decade, only a minority of people with type 1 diabetes achieve an HbA1c &lt;53 mmol/mol.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have consistently demonstrated efficacy in reducing HbA1c.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Omnipod 5 (Insulet Corp) is a tubeless AID system which was launched in the United Kingdom in 2023. Here, we report the first 1-year CGM, HbA1c and weight outcomes in people using Omnipod 5, under routine clinical care, in the United Kingdom.</p><p>This was a prospective, observational assessment based in a single Scottish centre which provides diabetes care for approximately 5000 adults with type 1 diabetes. As a service evaluation of routinely collected data, this project did not require ethical approval. We included all adults who transitioned from Omnipod DASH (standalone CSII) to Omnipod 5 (hybrid closed loop with Dexcom G6 CGM) between June and August 2023. Data were obtained from the electronic health record (SCI-Diabetes), LibreView, Dexcom Clarity and Glooko.</p><p>Paired CGM data were available in 45/50 (90 days prior to Omnipod 5 and 90 days after 1 year of use) and paired HbA1c data were available in 41/50 (measured at a median 200 days [202–336] after OP5 commencement). CGM metrics reported are consistent with those described in the international consensus document.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Paired weight data were available in 28/50 (median 308 days after OP5 commencement [244–370]). Results are presented as median (IQR). Paired data were compared with Wilcoxon signed rank tests and correlations were assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. <i>p</i> &lt;0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio.</p><p>Median age was 42 years (IQR: 30–53), duration of diabetes was 24 years (13–34) and 64% were female. Baseline HbA1c was 69 mmol/mol (61–75) and 22% had an HbA1c &lt;58 mmol/mol. Thirty-eight per cent had BMI &gt;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Fifty-nine per cent were predominantly using the lowest glucose target (6.1 mM) at the end of follow-up and median time in auto mode was 94% (91–99).</p><p>In those with paired HbA1c data, median baseline HbA1c was 70 mmol/mol (63–76) and fell to 58 mmol/mol (52–63) during Omnipod 5 use (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Data summarising CGM changes are presented in the figure (Figure 1), including a change in TIR from 42% (33–58) to 60% (53–68, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). GMI fell from 66 mmol/mol (57–70) to 58 mmol/mol (54–62, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and coefficient of variation for glucose fell from 37% (34–42) to 34% (32–38, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Change in TIR at 1 year was strongly negatively correlated with baseline TIR (<i>R</i> −0.581, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Percentage of insulin delivered as bolus was negatively correlated with increase in TIR (<i>R</i> −0.518, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Age, sex and socio-economic deprivation were not associated with TIR response to Omnipod 5.</p><p>Median weight change was +2.3 kg (−1.3 to 3.8) or + 3.0% of baseline weight (−1.6 to 5.2). Weight change was not associated with change in HbA1c (<i>R</i> 0.115, <i>p</i> = 0.560) or TIR (<i>R</i> −0.101, <i>p</i> = 0.607).</p><p>We have shown that Omnipod 5 is associated with clinically important improvement in TIR with no increase in TBR. Our cohort differs from other evaluations of Omnipod 5<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> as the baseline HbA1c of participants was relatively high. Those with lowest TIR (highest HbA1c) are most likely to experience substantial increases in TIR when converting from standalone CSII to Omnipod 5. Individuals where bolus insulin was lowest (in relation to basal insulin) experienced the largest improvements in TIR; suggesting the system is effective in those who have historically delivered insufficient insulin doses at mealtimes. Reassuringly, weight gain was typically modest and not associated with improvements in HbA1c or TIR. This is the first real-world assessment of 1-year outcomes with Omnipod 5 in the United Kingdom and attests to the durability of improvements observed shortly after commencement.</p><p>No funding source to report.</p><p>FWG has received speaker fees from Abbott, Dexcom and Insulet. ARD has received speaker fees from Abbott.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"41 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.15453\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.15453\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.15453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2 Omnipod 5 (Insulet Corp) 是一种无管胰岛素给药系统,于 2023 年在英国上市。在此,我们报告了英国在常规临床护理中使用 Omnipod 5 的首个 1 年 CGM、HbA1c 和体重结果。这是一项前瞻性观察评估,以苏格兰的一个中心为基础,该中心为大约 5000 名 1 型糖尿病成人患者提供糖尿病护理。作为对常规收集数据的服务评估,该项目无需获得伦理批准。我们纳入了所有在 2023 年 6 月至 8 月期间从 Omnipod DASH(独立 CSII)过渡到 Omnipod 5(与 Dexcom G6 CGM 混合闭环)的成人患者。45/50(Omnipod 5 使用前 90 天和使用 1 年后 90 天)的配对 CGM 数据可用,41/50(OP5 开始后 200 天[202-336]的中位测量值)的配对 HbA1c 数据可用。报告的 CGM 指标与国际共识文件3 中描述的指标一致。有 28/50 人获得了配对体重数据(OP5 开始使用后的中位数为 308 天 [244-370])。结果以中位数(IQR)表示。配对数据采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行比较,相关性采用 Spearman 相关系数进行评估。中位年龄为 42 岁(IQR:30-53),糖尿病病程为 24 年(13-34),64% 为女性。基线 HbA1c 为 69 mmol/mol(61-75),22% 的患者 HbA1c 为 58 mmol/mol。38%的人体重指数为 30 kg/m2。在有配对 HbA1c 数据的患者中,基线 HbA1c 中位数为 70 mmol/mol(63-76),在使用 Omnipod 5 期间降至 58 mmol/mol(52-63)(p <0.001)。CGM 变化数据汇总见图(图 1),包括 TIR 从 42% (33-58) 变为 60% (53-68, p < 0.001)。GMI 从 66 mmol/mol (57-70) 降至 58 mmol/mol (54-62,p < 0.001),血糖变异系数从 37% (34-42) 降至 34% (32-38,p = 0.009)。1 年后 TIR 的变化与基线 TIR 呈强负相关(R -0.581,p = 0.001)。胰岛素注射百分比与 TIR 的增加呈负相关(R -0.518,p <0.001)。体重变化的中位数为 +2.3千克(-1.3 至 3.8)或基线体重的 +3.0%(-1.6 至 5.2)。体重变化与 HbA1c(R 0.115,p = 0.560)或 TIR(R -0.101,p = 0.607)的变化无关。我们的研究表明,Omnipod 5 与 TIR 的临床重要改善相关,而 TBR 没有增加。我们的队列不同于其他对 Omnipod 54 和 5 的评估,因为参与者的基线 HbA1c 相对较高。从独立 CSII 转换到 Omnipod 5 时,TIR 最低(HbA1c 最高)的人最有可能出现 TIR 的大幅增加。与基础胰岛素相比,栓注胰岛素最低的患者的 TIR 改善幅度最大;这表明该系统对进餐时胰岛素剂量不足的患者非常有效。令人欣慰的是,体重增加通常不大,而且与 HbA1c 或 TIR 的改善无关。这是英国首次对使用 Omnipod 5 1 年后的效果进行实际评估,证明了开始使用后不久观察到的改善效果的持久性。FWG 从雅培、Dexcom 和 Insulet 获得了演讲费。ARD 从雅培获得了演讲费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes after 1 year in adults using Omnipod 5: Real-world data from a UK diabetes centre

Outcomes after 1 year in adults using Omnipod 5: Real-world data from a UK diabetes centre

Despite substantial advances in diabetes care over the previous decade, only a minority of people with type 1 diabetes achieve an HbA1c <53 mmol/mol.1 Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have consistently demonstrated efficacy in reducing HbA1c.2 Omnipod 5 (Insulet Corp) is a tubeless AID system which was launched in the United Kingdom in 2023. Here, we report the first 1-year CGM, HbA1c and weight outcomes in people using Omnipod 5, under routine clinical care, in the United Kingdom.

This was a prospective, observational assessment based in a single Scottish centre which provides diabetes care for approximately 5000 adults with type 1 diabetes. As a service evaluation of routinely collected data, this project did not require ethical approval. We included all adults who transitioned from Omnipod DASH (standalone CSII) to Omnipod 5 (hybrid closed loop with Dexcom G6 CGM) between June and August 2023. Data were obtained from the electronic health record (SCI-Diabetes), LibreView, Dexcom Clarity and Glooko.

Paired CGM data were available in 45/50 (90 days prior to Omnipod 5 and 90 days after 1 year of use) and paired HbA1c data were available in 41/50 (measured at a median 200 days [202–336] after OP5 commencement). CGM metrics reported are consistent with those described in the international consensus document.3 Paired weight data were available in 28/50 (median 308 days after OP5 commencement [244–370]). Results are presented as median (IQR). Paired data were compared with Wilcoxon signed rank tests and correlations were assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. p <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio.

Median age was 42 years (IQR: 30–53), duration of diabetes was 24 years (13–34) and 64% were female. Baseline HbA1c was 69 mmol/mol (61–75) and 22% had an HbA1c <58 mmol/mol. Thirty-eight per cent had BMI >30 kg/m2. Fifty-nine per cent were predominantly using the lowest glucose target (6.1 mM) at the end of follow-up and median time in auto mode was 94% (91–99).

In those with paired HbA1c data, median baseline HbA1c was 70 mmol/mol (63–76) and fell to 58 mmol/mol (52–63) during Omnipod 5 use (p < 0.001). Data summarising CGM changes are presented in the figure (Figure 1), including a change in TIR from 42% (33–58) to 60% (53–68, p < 0.001). GMI fell from 66 mmol/mol (57–70) to 58 mmol/mol (54–62, p < 0.001) and coefficient of variation for glucose fell from 37% (34–42) to 34% (32–38, p = 0.009). Change in TIR at 1 year was strongly negatively correlated with baseline TIR (R −0.581, p < 0.001). Percentage of insulin delivered as bolus was negatively correlated with increase in TIR (R −0.518, p < 0.001). Age, sex and socio-economic deprivation were not associated with TIR response to Omnipod 5.

Median weight change was +2.3 kg (−1.3 to 3.8) or + 3.0% of baseline weight (−1.6 to 5.2). Weight change was not associated with change in HbA1c (R 0.115, p = 0.560) or TIR (R −0.101, p = 0.607).

We have shown that Omnipod 5 is associated with clinically important improvement in TIR with no increase in TBR. Our cohort differs from other evaluations of Omnipod 54, 5 as the baseline HbA1c of participants was relatively high. Those with lowest TIR (highest HbA1c) are most likely to experience substantial increases in TIR when converting from standalone CSII to Omnipod 5. Individuals where bolus insulin was lowest (in relation to basal insulin) experienced the largest improvements in TIR; suggesting the system is effective in those who have historically delivered insufficient insulin doses at mealtimes. Reassuringly, weight gain was typically modest and not associated with improvements in HbA1c or TIR. This is the first real-world assessment of 1-year outcomes with Omnipod 5 in the United Kingdom and attests to the durability of improvements observed shortly after commencement.

No funding source to report.

FWG has received speaker fees from Abbott, Dexcom and Insulet. ARD has received speaker fees from Abbott.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信