精英种质引进、训练集组成和遗传优化算法对基于基因组选择的育种计划的影响

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21384
Roberto Fritsche-Neto, Rafael Massahiro Yassue, Allison Vieira da Silva, Melina Prado, Júlio César DoVale
{"title":"精英种质引进、训练集组成和遗传优化算法对基于基因组选择的育种计划的影响","authors":"Roberto Fritsche-Neto,&nbsp;Rafael Massahiro Yassue,&nbsp;Allison Vieira da Silva,&nbsp;Melina Prado,&nbsp;Júlio César DoVale","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In genomic selection (GS), the prediction accuracy is heavily influenced by the composition of the training set (TS). Currently, two primary strategies for building TS are used: one involves accumulating historical phenotypic records from multiple years, while the other is the “test-and-shelf” approach. Additionally, studies have suggested that optimizing TS composition using genetic algorithms can improve the accuracy of prediction models. Most breeders operate in open systems, introducing new genetic variability into their populations as needed. However, the impact of elite germplasm introduction in GS models remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a case study in self-pollinated crops using stochastic simulations to understand the effects of elite germplasm introduction, TS composition, and its optimization in long-term breeding programs. Overall, introducing external elite germplasm reduces the prediction accuracy. In this context, test and shelf seem more stable regarding accuracy in dealing with introductions despite the origin and rate, being useful in programs where the introductions come from different sources over the years. Conversely, using historical data, if the introductions come from the same source over the cycles, this negative effect is reduced as long as the cycles and this approach become the best. Thus, it may support public breeding programs in establishing networks of collaborations where the exchange of germplasm will occur at a predefined rate and flow. In either case, the use of algorithms of optimization to trim the genetic variability does not bring a substantial advantage in the medium to long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"64 6","pages":"3323-3338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.21384","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elite germplasm introduction, training set composition, and genetic optimization algorithms effect on genomic selection-based breeding programs\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Fritsche-Neto,&nbsp;Rafael Massahiro Yassue,&nbsp;Allison Vieira da Silva,&nbsp;Melina Prado,&nbsp;Júlio César DoVale\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csc2.21384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In genomic selection (GS), the prediction accuracy is heavily influenced by the composition of the training set (TS). Currently, two primary strategies for building TS are used: one involves accumulating historical phenotypic records from multiple years, while the other is the “test-and-shelf” approach. Additionally, studies have suggested that optimizing TS composition using genetic algorithms can improve the accuracy of prediction models. Most breeders operate in open systems, introducing new genetic variability into their populations as needed. However, the impact of elite germplasm introduction in GS models remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a case study in self-pollinated crops using stochastic simulations to understand the effects of elite germplasm introduction, TS composition, and its optimization in long-term breeding programs. Overall, introducing external elite germplasm reduces the prediction accuracy. In this context, test and shelf seem more stable regarding accuracy in dealing with introductions despite the origin and rate, being useful in programs where the introductions come from different sources over the years. Conversely, using historical data, if the introductions come from the same source over the cycles, this negative effect is reduced as long as the cycles and this approach become the best. Thus, it may support public breeding programs in establishing networks of collaborations where the exchange of germplasm will occur at a predefined rate and flow. In either case, the use of algorithms of optimization to trim the genetic variability does not bring a substantial advantage in the medium to long term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Science\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"3323-3338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.21384\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21384\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在基因组选择(GS)中,预测准确性在很大程度上受训练集(TS)组成的影响。目前,建立训练集的主要策略有两种:一种是积累多年的历史表型记录,另一种是 "先试验后上架 "的方法。此外,有研究表明,利用遗传算法优化 TS 的组成可以提高预测模型的准确性。大多数育种者在开放系统中工作,根据需要将新的遗传变异引入种群。然而,在 GS 模型中引入精英种质的影响仍不明确。因此,我们利用随机模拟对自花授粉作物进行了案例研究,以了解在长期育种计划中引入精英种质、TS组成及其优化的影响。总体而言,引入外部精英种质会降低预测精度。在这种情况下,尽管引种的来源和速度不同,但测试和架式在处理引种时的准确性似乎更稳定,这对多年来引种来源不同的计划非常有用。相反,利用历史数据,如果引种在不同周期内来自同一来源,只要周期和这种方法成为最佳,这种负面影响就会减少。因此,它可以支持公共育种计划建立合作网络,按照预先确定的速度和流量进行种质交流。无论哪种情况,使用优化算法来调整遗传变异性在中长期内都不会带来实质性的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Elite germplasm introduction, training set composition, and genetic optimization algorithms effect on genomic selection-based breeding programs

Elite germplasm introduction, training set composition, and genetic optimization algorithms effect on genomic selection-based breeding programs

In genomic selection (GS), the prediction accuracy is heavily influenced by the composition of the training set (TS). Currently, two primary strategies for building TS are used: one involves accumulating historical phenotypic records from multiple years, while the other is the “test-and-shelf” approach. Additionally, studies have suggested that optimizing TS composition using genetic algorithms can improve the accuracy of prediction models. Most breeders operate in open systems, introducing new genetic variability into their populations as needed. However, the impact of elite germplasm introduction in GS models remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a case study in self-pollinated crops using stochastic simulations to understand the effects of elite germplasm introduction, TS composition, and its optimization in long-term breeding programs. Overall, introducing external elite germplasm reduces the prediction accuracy. In this context, test and shelf seem more stable regarding accuracy in dealing with introductions despite the origin and rate, being useful in programs where the introductions come from different sources over the years. Conversely, using historical data, if the introductions come from the same source over the cycles, this negative effect is reduced as long as the cycles and this approach become the best. Thus, it may support public breeding programs in establishing networks of collaborations where the exchange of germplasm will occur at a predefined rate and flow. In either case, the use of algorithms of optimization to trim the genetic variability does not bring a substantial advantage in the medium to long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信