晚期前列腺癌患者的管理。2024 年晚期前列腺癌共识会议(APCCC)报告

IF 25.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Silke Gillessen, Fabio Turco, Ian D. Davis, Jason A. Efstathiou, Karim Fizazi, Nicholas D. James, Neal Shore, Eric Small, Matthew Smith, Christopher J. Sweeney, Bertrand Tombal, Thomas Zilli, Neeraj Agarwal, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Ana Aparicio, Andrew J. Armstrong, Diogo Assed Bastos, Gerhardt Attard, Karol Axcrona, Mouna Ayadi, Aurelius Omlin
{"title":"晚期前列腺癌患者的管理。2024 年晚期前列腺癌共识会议(APCCC)报告","authors":"Silke Gillessen, Fabio Turco, Ian D. Davis, Jason A. Efstathiou, Karim Fizazi, Nicholas D. James, Neal Shore, Eric Small, Matthew Smith, Christopher J. Sweeney, Bertrand Tombal, Thomas Zilli, Neeraj Agarwal, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Ana Aparicio, Andrew J. Armstrong, Diogo Assed Bastos, Gerhardt Attard, Karol Axcrona, Mouna Ayadi, Aurelius Omlin","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background and objective</h3>Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts on key questions in clinical management in order to supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here we present voting results for questions from APCCC 2024.<h3>Methods</h3>Before the conference, a panel of 120 international PC experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 183 multiple-choice consensus questions on eight different topics. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the voting panel members (“panellists”).<h3>Key findings and limitations</h3>Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. The voting results show varying degrees of consensus, as discussed in this article and detailed in the Supplementary material. These findings do not include a formal literature review or meta-analysis.<h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3>The voting results can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised on the basis of patient and cancer characteristics, and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2024 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Report from the 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC)\",\"authors\":\"Silke Gillessen, Fabio Turco, Ian D. Davis, Jason A. Efstathiou, Karim Fizazi, Nicholas D. James, Neal Shore, Eric Small, Matthew Smith, Christopher J. Sweeney, Bertrand Tombal, Thomas Zilli, Neeraj Agarwal, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Ana Aparicio, Andrew J. Armstrong, Diogo Assed Bastos, Gerhardt Attard, Karol Axcrona, Mouna Ayadi, Aurelius Omlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background and objective</h3>Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts on key questions in clinical management in order to supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here we present voting results for questions from APCCC 2024.<h3>Methods</h3>Before the conference, a panel of 120 international PC experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 183 multiple-choice consensus questions on eight different topics. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the voting panel members (“panellists”).<h3>Key findings and limitations</h3>Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. The voting results show varying degrees of consensus, as discussed in this article and detailed in the Supplementary material. These findings do not include a formal literature review or meta-analysis.<h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3>The voting results can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised on the basis of patient and cancer characteristics, and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2024 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的创新改善了晚期前列腺癌(PC)的治疗效果。然而,在对日常实践有重大影响的各种主题上,我们仍然缺乏高水平的证据。2024 年晚期前列腺癌共识会议(APCCC)就临床管理中的关键问题对专家进行了调查,以补充循证指南。方法在会议召开前,由 120 位国际 PC 专家组成的小组采用改良的德尔菲流程,就 8 个不同的主题制定了 183 个多选共识问题。主要发现和局限性共识的先验定义是≥75%的一致意见,强烈共识的定义是≥90%的一致意见。投票结果显示了不同程度的共识,本文对此进行了讨论,并在补充材料中进行了详细说明。这些结果不包括正式的文献综述或荟萃分析。结论和临床意义投票结果可以帮助医生和患者了解临床管理中存在争议的领域,因为这些领域的高级别证据很少或存在冲突。投票结果还有助于资助者和政策制定者确定未来研究的优先领域。诊断和治疗决策应始终根据患者和癌症特征进行个体化,并应结合当前和新出现的临床证据、指南以及后勤和经济因素。我们始终大力鼓励参加临床试验。重要的是,亚太癌症研究中心 2024 年会议再次确定了值得在专门设计的试验中进行评估的重要差距(未达成共识的领域)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Report from the 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC)

Background and objective

Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts on key questions in clinical management in order to supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here we present voting results for questions from APCCC 2024.

Methods

Before the conference, a panel of 120 international PC experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 183 multiple-choice consensus questions on eight different topics. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the voting panel members (“panellists”).

Key findings and limitations

Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. The voting results show varying degrees of consensus, as discussed in this article and detailed in the Supplementary material. These findings do not include a formal literature review or meta-analysis.

Conclusions and clinical implications

The voting results can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised on the basis of patient and cancer characteristics, and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2024 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology
European urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1753
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信