Mackenzie Zisser, Jason Shumake, Christopher G. Beevers
{"title":"复杂情绪动态有助于预测抑郁症:机器学习和时间序列特征提取方法。","authors":"Mackenzie Zisser, Jason Shumake, Christopher G. Beevers","doi":"10.1007/s42761-024-00249-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emotion dynamics have demonstrated mixed ability to predict depressive symptoms and outperform traditional metrics like the mean and standard deviation of emotion reports. Here, we expand the types of emotion dynamic features used in prior work and apply a machine learning algorithm to predict depression symptoms. We obtained seven ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies from previous work on depression and emotion dynamics (<i>N</i> = 890). These studies measured self-reported sadness, positive affect, and negative affect 5 to 10 times per day for 7 to 21 days (schedule varied across studies). These data were fed through a feature extraction routine to generate hundreds of emotion dynamic features. A gradient boosting machine (GBM) using all available emotion dynamics features was the best of all models assessed. This model’s out-of-sample prediction (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>pred</sub>) for depression severity ranged from .20 to .44 depending on EMA interpolation method and samples included in the analysis. It also explained significantly more variance than a benchmark model of individuals’ mean emotion ratings over the assessment period, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>pred</sub> = .089. Comprehensive feature mining of emotion dynamics obtained during EMA may be necessary to identify processes that predict depression symptoms beyond mean emotion ratings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"5 3","pages":"259 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex Emotion Dynamics Contribute to the Prediction of Depression: A Machine Learning and Time Series Feature Extraction Approach\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie Zisser, Jason Shumake, Christopher G. Beevers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42761-024-00249-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Emotion dynamics have demonstrated mixed ability to predict depressive symptoms and outperform traditional metrics like the mean and standard deviation of emotion reports. Here, we expand the types of emotion dynamic features used in prior work and apply a machine learning algorithm to predict depression symptoms. We obtained seven ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies from previous work on depression and emotion dynamics (<i>N</i> = 890). These studies measured self-reported sadness, positive affect, and negative affect 5 to 10 times per day for 7 to 21 days (schedule varied across studies). These data were fed through a feature extraction routine to generate hundreds of emotion dynamic features. A gradient boosting machine (GBM) using all available emotion dynamics features was the best of all models assessed. This model’s out-of-sample prediction (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>pred</sub>) for depression severity ranged from .20 to .44 depending on EMA interpolation method and samples included in the analysis. It also explained significantly more variance than a benchmark model of individuals’ mean emotion ratings over the assessment period, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>pred</sub> = .089. Comprehensive feature mining of emotion dynamics obtained during EMA may be necessary to identify processes that predict depression symptoms beyond mean emotion ratings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affective science\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"259 - 272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affective science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00249-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00249-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
情绪动态在预测抑郁症状方面的能力参差不齐,而且优于情绪报告的平均值和标准偏差等传统指标。在此,我们扩展了之前工作中使用的情绪动态特征类型,并应用机器学习算法来预测抑郁症状。我们从以前关于抑郁和情绪动态的研究中获得了七项生态瞬间评估(EMA)研究(N = 890)。这些研究测量了自我报告的悲伤情绪、积极情绪和消极情绪,每天测量 5 到 10 次,持续 7 到 21 天(不同研究的时间安排不同)。这些数据通过特征提取程序生成数百个情绪动态特征。使用所有可用情绪动态特征的梯度提升机(GBM)是所有评估模型中最好的。该模型对抑郁严重程度的样本外预测(R 2 pred)从 0.20 到 0.44 不等,具体取决于 EMA 插值方法和分析中包含的样本。与评估期间个人平均情绪评级的基准模型(R 2 pred = .089)相比,该模型对方差的解释也明显更多。要识别平均情绪评分以外的预测抑郁症状的过程,可能需要对 EMA 期间获得的情绪动态进行全面的特征挖掘。
Complex Emotion Dynamics Contribute to the Prediction of Depression: A Machine Learning and Time Series Feature Extraction Approach
Emotion dynamics have demonstrated mixed ability to predict depressive symptoms and outperform traditional metrics like the mean and standard deviation of emotion reports. Here, we expand the types of emotion dynamic features used in prior work and apply a machine learning algorithm to predict depression symptoms. We obtained seven ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies from previous work on depression and emotion dynamics (N = 890). These studies measured self-reported sadness, positive affect, and negative affect 5 to 10 times per day for 7 to 21 days (schedule varied across studies). These data were fed through a feature extraction routine to generate hundreds of emotion dynamic features. A gradient boosting machine (GBM) using all available emotion dynamics features was the best of all models assessed. This model’s out-of-sample prediction (R2pred) for depression severity ranged from .20 to .44 depending on EMA interpolation method and samples included in the analysis. It also explained significantly more variance than a benchmark model of individuals’ mean emotion ratings over the assessment period, R2pred = .089. Comprehensive feature mining of emotion dynamics obtained during EMA may be necessary to identify processes that predict depression symptoms beyond mean emotion ratings.