海洋保护区可以为过度开发但不可持续捕捞的渔业提供环境波动缓冲。

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
J Wilson White, D Patrick Kilduff, Alan Hastings, Louis W Botsford
{"title":"海洋保护区可以为过度开发但不可持续捕捞的渔业提供环境波动缓冲。","authors":"J Wilson White, D Patrick Kilduff, Alan Hastings, Louis W Botsford","doi":"10.1002/eap.3043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, decision-makers are seeking management levers that can mitigate the negative effects of climate change on ecosystems that have already been transformed from their natural state by the effects of fishing. An important question is whether marine reserves can provide buffering (i.e., population-level resilience) against climate disturbances to fished populations. Here, we examine one aspect of this question, by asking whether marine reserves can reduce the variability in either overall biomass or in fishery yield, in the face of environmental variability. This could happen because greater reproduction of longer-lived, larger fish inside reserves could supplement recruitment to the fished portion of the population. We addressed this question using age-structured population models, assuming a system where some proportion of the coastline is protected in marine reserves (0%-30%), and the remainder is fished (at a range of possible harvest rates). We modeled populations with sedentary adults and dispersal via a larval pool. Since recent extreme climate events (e.g., marine heatwaves) have reduced juvenile survival for some fish species, we assumed that environmental variability affected the survival of the first age class in our model. We viewed population variability as a question of buffering, measured as the proportion of time a simulated population spent below a target reference point, with the idea that marine reserves could prevent the population from reaching low levels in the face of fishing and environmental variability. We found that fisheries with more area in marine reserves always had less variability in biomass. However, adding marine reserves only reduced variability in fisheries yield when the fished part of the population was being harvested at a rate exceeding the maximum sustainable yield. This new result on reducing variability is in line with previous findings that the \"spillover\" effects of marine reserve benefits to fishery yields only accrue when the fishery outside reserve boundaries is being overharvested.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":" ","pages":"e3043"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marine reserves can buffer against environmental fluctuations for overexploited but not sustainably harvested fisheries.\",\"authors\":\"J Wilson White, D Patrick Kilduff, Alan Hastings, Louis W Botsford\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eap.3043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Globally, decision-makers are seeking management levers that can mitigate the negative effects of climate change on ecosystems that have already been transformed from their natural state by the effects of fishing. An important question is whether marine reserves can provide buffering (i.e., population-level resilience) against climate disturbances to fished populations. Here, we examine one aspect of this question, by asking whether marine reserves can reduce the variability in either overall biomass or in fishery yield, in the face of environmental variability. This could happen because greater reproduction of longer-lived, larger fish inside reserves could supplement recruitment to the fished portion of the population. We addressed this question using age-structured population models, assuming a system where some proportion of the coastline is protected in marine reserves (0%-30%), and the remainder is fished (at a range of possible harvest rates). We modeled populations with sedentary adults and dispersal via a larval pool. Since recent extreme climate events (e.g., marine heatwaves) have reduced juvenile survival for some fish species, we assumed that environmental variability affected the survival of the first age class in our model. We viewed population variability as a question of buffering, measured as the proportion of time a simulated population spent below a target reference point, with the idea that marine reserves could prevent the population from reaching low levels in the face of fishing and environmental variability. We found that fisheries with more area in marine reserves always had less variability in biomass. However, adding marine reserves only reduced variability in fisheries yield when the fished part of the population was being harvested at a rate exceeding the maximum sustainable yield. This new result on reducing variability is in line with previous findings that the \\\"spillover\\\" effects of marine reserve benefits to fishery yields only accrue when the fishery outside reserve boundaries is being overharvested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e3043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.3043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.3043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,决策者都在寻求能够减轻气候变化对生态系统负面影响的管理手段,这些生态系统已经因捕捞影响而改变了其自然状态。一个重要的问题是,海洋保护区能否为渔业种群提供缓冲(即种群层面的恢复力),以抵御气候干扰。在此,我们通过询问海洋保护区是否能在环境多变的情况下减少总体生物量或渔业产量的变化,来研究这一问题的一个方面。之所以会出现这种情况,是因为保护区内寿命更长、体型更大的鱼类的繁殖能力更强,可以补充被捕捞部分种群的补充。我们使用年龄结构的种群模型来解决这个问题,假设在一个系统中,一定比例的海岸线受到海洋保护区的保护(0%-30%),其余部分被捕捞(捕捞率在一定范围内)。我们模拟的种群具有定居的成体,并通过幼体池进行扩散。由于最近发生的极端气候事件(如海洋热浪)降低了某些鱼类的幼鱼存活率,因此我们假定环境变化会影响模型中第一年龄层鱼类的存活率。我们将种群变异性视为缓冲问题,以模拟种群低于目标参考点的时间比例来衡量,认为海洋保护区可以防止种群在捕捞和环境变异的情况下达到低水平。我们发现,海洋保护区面积越大的渔场,生物量的变化总是越小。然而,只有当被捕捞部分的捕捞速度超过最大持续产量时,增加海洋保护区才能减少渔业产量的变化。这一降低变异性的新结果与之前的研究结果一致,即海洋保护区对渔业产量的 "溢出 "效应只有在保护区边界外的渔业被过度捕捞时才会产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marine reserves can buffer against environmental fluctuations for overexploited but not sustainably harvested fisheries.

Globally, decision-makers are seeking management levers that can mitigate the negative effects of climate change on ecosystems that have already been transformed from their natural state by the effects of fishing. An important question is whether marine reserves can provide buffering (i.e., population-level resilience) against climate disturbances to fished populations. Here, we examine one aspect of this question, by asking whether marine reserves can reduce the variability in either overall biomass or in fishery yield, in the face of environmental variability. This could happen because greater reproduction of longer-lived, larger fish inside reserves could supplement recruitment to the fished portion of the population. We addressed this question using age-structured population models, assuming a system where some proportion of the coastline is protected in marine reserves (0%-30%), and the remainder is fished (at a range of possible harvest rates). We modeled populations with sedentary adults and dispersal via a larval pool. Since recent extreme climate events (e.g., marine heatwaves) have reduced juvenile survival for some fish species, we assumed that environmental variability affected the survival of the first age class in our model. We viewed population variability as a question of buffering, measured as the proportion of time a simulated population spent below a target reference point, with the idea that marine reserves could prevent the population from reaching low levels in the face of fishing and environmental variability. We found that fisheries with more area in marine reserves always had less variability in biomass. However, adding marine reserves only reduced variability in fisheries yield when the fished part of the population was being harvested at a rate exceeding the maximum sustainable yield. This new result on reducing variability is in line with previous findings that the "spillover" effects of marine reserve benefits to fishery yields only accrue when the fishery outside reserve boundaries is being overharvested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信