奥地利护士对协助自杀立法的经验和态度。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elisabeth Lucia Zeilinger, Arzu Petersen, Nadine Brunevskaya, Amelie Fuchs, Theresa Wagner, Jakob Pietschnig, Anna Kitta, Franziska Ecker, Lea Kum, Feroniki Adamidis, Joachim Bär, Connie Sifuentes Caccire, Matthias Unseld, Eva Katharina Masel
{"title":"奥地利护士对协助自杀立法的经验和态度。","authors":"Elisabeth Lucia Zeilinger, Arzu Petersen, Nadine Brunevskaya, Amelie Fuchs, Theresa Wagner, Jakob Pietschnig, Anna Kitta, Franziska Ecker, Lea Kum, Feroniki Adamidis, Joachim Bär, Connie Sifuentes Caccire, Matthias Unseld, Eva Katharina Masel","doi":"10.1017/S147895152400107X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2022, assisted suicide (AS) was legalized in Austria. We aimed to investigate the experiences and attitudes of palliative care (PC) and hospice nurses toward AS in Austria after the first year of implementation of the new law.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was distributed online to nurses in every known specialized and general hospice and PC units in Austria (<i>n</i> = 255 units). The questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics, the Assisted Suicide Attitude Scale, the Comfort Discussing Assisted Suicide Scale, and questions on recent experiences with AS requests. We used Spearman's correlation coefficient for determining associations between sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes toward AS, as well as comfort discussing AS. For comparison of frequencies, we applied ꭓ<sup>2</sup> tests. We computed a linear regression model to examine predictors for attitudes toward AS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample were <i>N</i> = 280 nurses. More than half (61.2%) indicated that they had cared for a patient who expressed a wish for AS within the first year of implementation. Though responses varied widely, more nurses expressed support for AS than those were opposed (50.36% and 31.75%, respectively). Factors that statistically contributed to more reluctance toward AS in the regression model were older age, religiousness, and experience of working with patients expressing a wish for AS.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>This work provides valuable insight into nurses' perceptions toward the legislation of AS in the first year since the new law was passed. The results can inform the future development of the AS system and support for nurses in end-of-life care, and critically contribute to international discussions on this controversial topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and attitudes of nurses with the legislation on assisted suicide in Austria.\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Lucia Zeilinger, Arzu Petersen, Nadine Brunevskaya, Amelie Fuchs, Theresa Wagner, Jakob Pietschnig, Anna Kitta, Franziska Ecker, Lea Kum, Feroniki Adamidis, Joachim Bär, Connie Sifuentes Caccire, Matthias Unseld, Eva Katharina Masel\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S147895152400107X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2022, assisted suicide (AS) was legalized in Austria. We aimed to investigate the experiences and attitudes of palliative care (PC) and hospice nurses toward AS in Austria after the first year of implementation of the new law.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was distributed online to nurses in every known specialized and general hospice and PC units in Austria (<i>n</i> = 255 units). The questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics, the Assisted Suicide Attitude Scale, the Comfort Discussing Assisted Suicide Scale, and questions on recent experiences with AS requests. We used Spearman's correlation coefficient for determining associations between sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes toward AS, as well as comfort discussing AS. For comparison of frequencies, we applied ꭓ<sup>2</sup> tests. We computed a linear regression model to examine predictors for attitudes toward AS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample were <i>N</i> = 280 nurses. More than half (61.2%) indicated that they had cared for a patient who expressed a wish for AS within the first year of implementation. Though responses varied widely, more nurses expressed support for AS than those were opposed (50.36% and 31.75%, respectively). Factors that statistically contributed to more reluctance toward AS in the regression model were older age, religiousness, and experience of working with patients expressing a wish for AS.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>This work provides valuable insight into nurses' perceptions toward the legislation of AS in the first year since the new law was passed. The results can inform the future development of the AS system and support for nurses in end-of-life care, and critically contribute to international discussions on this controversial topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152400107X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152400107X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:2022 年,协助自杀(AS)在奥地利合法化。我们旨在调查奥地利姑息治疗(PC)和临终关怀护士在新法实施一年后对协助自杀的经验和态度:我们通过网络向奥地利所有已知的专科和普通临终关怀及姑息治疗机构(n = 255 家)的护士发放了一份横断面调查问卷。问卷内容包括社会人口学特征、辅助自杀态度量表、讨论辅助自杀舒适度量表,以及有关最近处理辅助自杀请求的经验的问题。我们使用斯皮尔曼相关系数来确定社会人口学特征与对辅助自杀的态度以及讨论辅助自杀的舒适度之间的关联。对于频率的比较,我们采用了ꭓ2 检验。我们计算了一个线性回归模型来研究对强直性脊柱炎态度的预测因素:样本总数为 N = 280 名护士。半数以上(61.2%)的人表示,在 AS 实施的第一年内,他们曾护理过一名表达过 AS 意愿的患者。尽管护士们的回答差异很大,但表示支持 AS 的护士多于反对 AS 的护士(分别为 50.36% 和 31.75%)。据统计,在回归模型中导致更多护士不愿意接受人工器官移植的因素包括年龄偏大、宗教信仰以及与表达人工器官移植愿望的患者打交道的经验:这项研究为了解护士在新法通过后的第一年对人工流产立法的看法提供了宝贵的资料。研究结果可为未来 "临终关怀 "系统的发展和对护士在临终关怀方面的支持提供参考,并对国际上有关这一争议性话题的讨论做出重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences and attitudes of nurses with the legislation on assisted suicide in Austria.

Objectives: In 2022, assisted suicide (AS) was legalized in Austria. We aimed to investigate the experiences and attitudes of palliative care (PC) and hospice nurses toward AS in Austria after the first year of implementation of the new law.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed online to nurses in every known specialized and general hospice and PC units in Austria (n = 255 units). The questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics, the Assisted Suicide Attitude Scale, the Comfort Discussing Assisted Suicide Scale, and questions on recent experiences with AS requests. We used Spearman's correlation coefficient for determining associations between sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes toward AS, as well as comfort discussing AS. For comparison of frequencies, we applied ꭓ2 tests. We computed a linear regression model to examine predictors for attitudes toward AS.

Results: The total sample were N = 280 nurses. More than half (61.2%) indicated that they had cared for a patient who expressed a wish for AS within the first year of implementation. Though responses varied widely, more nurses expressed support for AS than those were opposed (50.36% and 31.75%, respectively). Factors that statistically contributed to more reluctance toward AS in the regression model were older age, religiousness, and experience of working with patients expressing a wish for AS.

Significance of results: This work provides valuable insight into nurses' perceptions toward the legislation of AS in the first year since the new law was passed. The results can inform the future development of the AS system and support for nurses in end-of-life care, and critically contribute to international discussions on this controversial topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信