将不同遗传背景的植入前小鼠胚胎作为评估人类胚胎培养基成分的模型进行比较。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1007/s43032-024-01726-1
E Korchivaia, A Ivanova, I Volodyaev, M Semenova
{"title":"将不同遗传背景的植入前小鼠胚胎作为评估人类胚胎培养基成分的模型进行比较。","authors":"E Korchivaia, A Ivanova, I Volodyaev, M Semenova","doi":"10.1007/s43032-024-01726-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Can the best culture medium be determined by mouse embryo testing? Zygotes/embryos of four different mouse strains: inbred Balb/c (n = 79) and C57Bl/6 (n = 95), F1 hybrid DBA/2*C57Bl/6 (n = 133), and outbred ICR (n = 69) were incubated in vitro in four culture media: 1-Step Culture Medium (VitaVitro), CSC medium (Irvine Scientific), Sage 1-Step medium (Origio), G-TL medium (Vitrolife). The embryos were cultured under standard conditions at atmospheric oxygen: 37℃; 6% CO2, 100% humidity. Standard MEA-test parameters (number of expanded blastocysts on E4.5), as well as additional characteristics (embryo development on E2.5-E4.5, number of hatching and hatched blastocysts on E4.5, embryo arrest and degeneration) were assessed for each of the strain-medium combinations. The results were compared across strains as well as across media. Embryo development depended on both the media and the mouse strain. Embryos from inbred and outbred mice were more sensitive to suboptimal culture conditions compared to the hybrid strain; this was reflected in reduced blastocyst and hatching rates, as well as an increased percentage of arrested and degraded embryos. The choice of optimal media depended strongly on the strain: CSC was better for Balb/c, Sage 1-step for C57Bl/6, while both were preferred for hybrids, and G-TL for outbreds. VitaVitro was quite good for hybrids and performed worse for other strains. Overall, the embryos of each strain behaved differently in different media, and it was not possible to make a real preference for any of them over human embryos based on the results of any single mouse strain. Only a pooled sample of different mouse strains can be used for comprehensive media MEA testing. MEA testing with any strain of mice is doomed to error due to their specific culture requirements. Hybrid mice are too reproductively efficient and cannot be used to distinguish media based on their subtle differences. Outbred and inbred mice are too sensitive and may be delayed or degraded in culture media that is well suited to the requirements of human embryos. Combined analysis of multiple mouse strains should be used to test media more fully and may serve as a model for the heterogeneity of human embryos in IVF clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"3688-3696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Preimplantation Mouse Embryos with Different Genetic Backgrounds as Models for Evaluating Human Embryo Culture Media Composition.\",\"authors\":\"E Korchivaia, A Ivanova, I Volodyaev, M Semenova\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-024-01726-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Can the best culture medium be determined by mouse embryo testing? Zygotes/embryos of four different mouse strains: inbred Balb/c (n = 79) and C57Bl/6 (n = 95), F1 hybrid DBA/2*C57Bl/6 (n = 133), and outbred ICR (n = 69) were incubated in vitro in four culture media: 1-Step Culture Medium (VitaVitro), CSC medium (Irvine Scientific), Sage 1-Step medium (Origio), G-TL medium (Vitrolife). The embryos were cultured under standard conditions at atmospheric oxygen: 37℃; 6% CO2, 100% humidity. Standard MEA-test parameters (number of expanded blastocysts on E4.5), as well as additional characteristics (embryo development on E2.5-E4.5, number of hatching and hatched blastocysts on E4.5, embryo arrest and degeneration) were assessed for each of the strain-medium combinations. The results were compared across strains as well as across media. Embryo development depended on both the media and the mouse strain. Embryos from inbred and outbred mice were more sensitive to suboptimal culture conditions compared to the hybrid strain; this was reflected in reduced blastocyst and hatching rates, as well as an increased percentage of arrested and degraded embryos. The choice of optimal media depended strongly on the strain: CSC was better for Balb/c, Sage 1-step for C57Bl/6, while both were preferred for hybrids, and G-TL for outbreds. VitaVitro was quite good for hybrids and performed worse for other strains. Overall, the embryos of each strain behaved differently in different media, and it was not possible to make a real preference for any of them over human embryos based on the results of any single mouse strain. Only a pooled sample of different mouse strains can be used for comprehensive media MEA testing. MEA testing with any strain of mice is doomed to error due to their specific culture requirements. Hybrid mice are too reproductively efficient and cannot be used to distinguish media based on their subtle differences. Outbred and inbred mice are too sensitive and may be delayed or degraded in culture media that is well suited to the requirements of human embryos. Combined analysis of multiple mouse strains should be used to test media more fully and may serve as a model for the heterogeneity of human embryos in IVF clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3688-3696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01726-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01726-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能否通过小鼠胚胎测试确定最佳培养基?四种不同小鼠品系:近交系 Balb/c (n = 79) 和 C57Bl/6 (n = 95)、F1 杂交 DBA/2*C57Bl/6 (n = 133) 和外交系 ICR (n = 69) 的子胚胎/胚胎在四种培养基中进行体外培养:1 步培养基(VitaVitro)、CSC 培养基(Irvine Scientific)、Sage 1 步培养基(Origio)、G-TL 培养基(Vitrolife)。胚胎在标准条件下进行培养,温度为 37℃,二氧化碳含量为 6%,湿度为 100%。对每种菌株-培养基组合的标准 MEA 测试参数(E4.5 期扩大囊胚数)以及其他特征(E2.5-E4.5 期胚胎发育、E4.5 期孵化囊胚数、胚胎停育和退化)进行评估。对不同菌株和不同培养基的结果进行了比较。胚胎发育取决于培养基和小鼠品系。与杂交品系相比,近交和远交小鼠的胚胎对次优培养条件更敏感;这反映在囊胚率和孵化率降低,以及停育和退化胚胎的比例增加。最佳培养基的选择在很大程度上取决于品系:CSC 更适合 Balb/c,Sage 1-step 更适合 C57Bl/6,而两者都更适合杂交种,G-TL 适合外源种。VitaVitro 对杂交种效果较好,对其他品系效果较差。总的来说,每个品系的胚胎在不同培养基中的表现都不一样,因此无法根据任何一个小鼠品系的结果来真正确定哪个品系的胚胎优于人类胚胎。只有不同品系小鼠的集合样本才能用于全面的培养基 MEA 测试。由于小鼠的特殊培养要求,用任何品系的小鼠进行 MEA 测试都注定会出错。杂交小鼠繁殖效率太低,无法根据其细微差别来区分培养基。近交系和远交系小鼠过于敏感,在非常适合人类胚胎要求的培养基中可能会延迟或降解。应对多个小鼠品系进行综合分析,以更全面地测试培养基,并可作为试管婴儿诊所中人类胚胎异质性的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Preimplantation Mouse Embryos with Different Genetic Backgrounds as Models for Evaluating Human Embryo Culture Media Composition.

Can the best culture medium be determined by mouse embryo testing? Zygotes/embryos of four different mouse strains: inbred Balb/c (n = 79) and C57Bl/6 (n = 95), F1 hybrid DBA/2*C57Bl/6 (n = 133), and outbred ICR (n = 69) were incubated in vitro in four culture media: 1-Step Culture Medium (VitaVitro), CSC medium (Irvine Scientific), Sage 1-Step medium (Origio), G-TL medium (Vitrolife). The embryos were cultured under standard conditions at atmospheric oxygen: 37℃; 6% CO2, 100% humidity. Standard MEA-test parameters (number of expanded blastocysts on E4.5), as well as additional characteristics (embryo development on E2.5-E4.5, number of hatching and hatched blastocysts on E4.5, embryo arrest and degeneration) were assessed for each of the strain-medium combinations. The results were compared across strains as well as across media. Embryo development depended on both the media and the mouse strain. Embryos from inbred and outbred mice were more sensitive to suboptimal culture conditions compared to the hybrid strain; this was reflected in reduced blastocyst and hatching rates, as well as an increased percentage of arrested and degraded embryos. The choice of optimal media depended strongly on the strain: CSC was better for Balb/c, Sage 1-step for C57Bl/6, while both were preferred for hybrids, and G-TL for outbreds. VitaVitro was quite good for hybrids and performed worse for other strains. Overall, the embryos of each strain behaved differently in different media, and it was not possible to make a real preference for any of them over human embryos based on the results of any single mouse strain. Only a pooled sample of different mouse strains can be used for comprehensive media MEA testing. MEA testing with any strain of mice is doomed to error due to their specific culture requirements. Hybrid mice are too reproductively efficient and cannot be used to distinguish media based on their subtle differences. Outbred and inbred mice are too sensitive and may be delayed or degraded in culture media that is well suited to the requirements of human embryos. Combined analysis of multiple mouse strains should be used to test media more fully and may serve as a model for the heterogeneity of human embryos in IVF clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信