Colin I Clement, Vuong Nguyen, Frank Howes, Jenny Danks, Vincent Lee, David Wechsler, Emily Gregory Roberts, Mark Gillies, Mitchell Lawlor
{"title":"iStent 注射与白内障手术的纵向疗效对比:来自抗击青光眼致盲登记处的真实世界数据。","authors":"Colin I Clement, Vuong Nguyen, Frank Howes, Jenny Danks, Vincent Lee, David Wechsler, Emily Gregory Roberts, Mark Gillies, Mitchell Lawlor","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare combined phacoemulsification and iStent inject to phacoemulsification alone.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fight Glaucoma Blindness (FGB) registry - Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational registry study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyes that had combined phacoemulsification with iStent inject (iStent group) were compared to eyes that had phacoemulsification only (cataract alone). Primary outcome was percentage of eyes achieving >20% IOP reduction from baseline 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP and medication reduction, adverse events and secondary procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months the percentage of eyes achieving >20% reduction of IOP at 12 months was significantly higher in the iStent group compared to the cataract alone group (40.9% vs 30.1% p<0.001). Adverse events occurred at a low rate in both groups, and secondary IOP lowering procedures were significantly less frequent in the iStent group compared to cataract alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-world outcomes from the FGB registry at 12 months show phacoemulsification combined with iStent inject has higher efficacy and a reduced need for secondary IOP lowering surgery compared to phacoemulsification alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal outcomes of iStent inject with cataract surgery compared to cataract surgery alone: real-world data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness registry.\",\"authors\":\"Colin I Clement, Vuong Nguyen, Frank Howes, Jenny Danks, Vincent Lee, David Wechsler, Emily Gregory Roberts, Mark Gillies, Mitchell Lawlor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare combined phacoemulsification and iStent inject to phacoemulsification alone.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fight Glaucoma Blindness (FGB) registry - Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational registry study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyes that had combined phacoemulsification with iStent inject (iStent group) were compared to eyes that had phacoemulsification only (cataract alone). Primary outcome was percentage of eyes achieving >20% IOP reduction from baseline 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP and medication reduction, adverse events and secondary procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months the percentage of eyes achieving >20% reduction of IOP at 12 months was significantly higher in the iStent group compared to the cataract alone group (40.9% vs 30.1% p<0.001). Adverse events occurred at a low rate in both groups, and secondary IOP lowering procedures were significantly less frequent in the iStent group compared to cataract alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-world outcomes from the FGB registry at 12 months show phacoemulsification combined with iStent inject has higher efficacy and a reduced need for secondary IOP lowering surgery compared to phacoemulsification alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Longitudinal outcomes of iStent inject with cataract surgery compared to cataract surgery alone: real-world data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness registry.
Purpose: To compare combined phacoemulsification and iStent inject to phacoemulsification alone.
Methods: Eyes that had combined phacoemulsification with iStent inject (iStent group) were compared to eyes that had phacoemulsification only (cataract alone). Primary outcome was percentage of eyes achieving >20% IOP reduction from baseline 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP and medication reduction, adverse events and secondary procedures.
Results: At 12 months the percentage of eyes achieving >20% reduction of IOP at 12 months was significantly higher in the iStent group compared to the cataract alone group (40.9% vs 30.1% p<0.001). Adverse events occurred at a low rate in both groups, and secondary IOP lowering procedures were significantly less frequent in the iStent group compared to cataract alone.
Conclusions: Real-world outcomes from the FGB registry at 12 months show phacoemulsification combined with iStent inject has higher efficacy and a reduced need for secondary IOP lowering surgery compared to phacoemulsification alone.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.