使用 Impella 进行高风险 PCI 患者的右心室功能障碍。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
KARL-PHILIPP ROMMEL MD , GUILLAUME BONNET MD, PhD , LAVANYA BELLUMKONDA MD , ALEXANDRA J. LANSKY MD , DUZHI ZHAO MS , JULIA B. THOMPSON MS , YIRAN ZHANG MS , BJÖRN REDFORS MD, PhD , PHILIPP C. LURZ MD, PhD , JUAN F. GRANADA MD , ADITYA S. BHARADWAJ MD , M. BABAR BASIR DO , WILLIAM W. O'NEILL MD , DANIEL BURKHOFF MD, PhD
{"title":"使用 Impella 进行高风险 PCI 患者的右心室功能障碍。","authors":"KARL-PHILIPP ROMMEL MD ,&nbsp;GUILLAUME BONNET MD, PhD ,&nbsp;LAVANYA BELLUMKONDA MD ,&nbsp;ALEXANDRA J. LANSKY MD ,&nbsp;DUZHI ZHAO MS ,&nbsp;JULIA B. THOMPSON MS ,&nbsp;YIRAN ZHANG MS ,&nbsp;BJÖRN REDFORS MD, PhD ,&nbsp;PHILIPP C. LURZ MD, PhD ,&nbsp;JUAN F. GRANADA MD ,&nbsp;ADITYA S. BHARADWAJ MD ,&nbsp;M. BABAR BASIR DO ,&nbsp;WILLIAM W. O'NEILL MD ,&nbsp;DANIEL BURKHOFF MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is an important prognostic factor in several cardiac conditions, including acute and chronic heart failure. The impact of baseline RVD on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) supported by Impella is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients from the single-arm, multicenter PROTECT III study of Impella-supported HRPCI were stratified based on the presence or absence of RVD. RVD was quantitatively assessed by an echocardiography core laboratory and was defined as fractional area change &lt; 35%, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion &lt; 17 mm or pulsed-wave Doppler S-wave of the lateral tricuspid annulus &lt; 9.5 cm/s. Procedural outcomes, 90-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA, and repeat revascularization), and 1-year mortality were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 239 patients who underwent RV function assessment, 124 were found to have RVD. Lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher blood urea nitrogen levels, and more severe RV dilation were independently associated with RVD. The incidence of hypotensive episodes during PCI, the proportion of patients requiring prolonged Impella support, the completeness of revascularization, and the rate of in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between patients with vs without RVD. However, 90-day MACCE rates were higher in those with RVD, and RVD was a robust predictor of 1-year mortality in multivariable Cox-regression analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients undergoing HRPCI with Impella, RVD was associated with more advanced biventricular failure. The use of Impella support during HRPCI facilitated effective revascularization, even in those with concomitant RVD. Nevertheless, RVD was associated with unfavorable long-term prognoses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"30 10","pages":"Pages 1244-1254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing High-Risk PCI with Impella\",\"authors\":\"KARL-PHILIPP ROMMEL MD ,&nbsp;GUILLAUME BONNET MD, PhD ,&nbsp;LAVANYA BELLUMKONDA MD ,&nbsp;ALEXANDRA J. LANSKY MD ,&nbsp;DUZHI ZHAO MS ,&nbsp;JULIA B. THOMPSON MS ,&nbsp;YIRAN ZHANG MS ,&nbsp;BJÖRN REDFORS MD, PhD ,&nbsp;PHILIPP C. LURZ MD, PhD ,&nbsp;JUAN F. GRANADA MD ,&nbsp;ADITYA S. BHARADWAJ MD ,&nbsp;M. BABAR BASIR DO ,&nbsp;WILLIAM W. O'NEILL MD ,&nbsp;DANIEL BURKHOFF MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is an important prognostic factor in several cardiac conditions, including acute and chronic heart failure. The impact of baseline RVD on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) supported by Impella is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients from the single-arm, multicenter PROTECT III study of Impella-supported HRPCI were stratified based on the presence or absence of RVD. RVD was quantitatively assessed by an echocardiography core laboratory and was defined as fractional area change &lt; 35%, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion &lt; 17 mm or pulsed-wave Doppler S-wave of the lateral tricuspid annulus &lt; 9.5 cm/s. Procedural outcomes, 90-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA, and repeat revascularization), and 1-year mortality were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 239 patients who underwent RV function assessment, 124 were found to have RVD. Lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher blood urea nitrogen levels, and more severe RV dilation were independently associated with RVD. The incidence of hypotensive episodes during PCI, the proportion of patients requiring prolonged Impella support, the completeness of revascularization, and the rate of in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between patients with vs without RVD. However, 90-day MACCE rates were higher in those with RVD, and RVD was a robust predictor of 1-year mortality in multivariable Cox-regression analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients undergoing HRPCI with Impella, RVD was associated with more advanced biventricular failure. The use of Impella support during HRPCI facilitated effective revascularization, even in those with concomitant RVD. Nevertheless, RVD was associated with unfavorable long-term prognoses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\"30 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1244-1254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424002690\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424002690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:右心室功能障碍(RVD)是包括急性和慢性心力衰竭在内的多种心脏疾病的重要预后因素。基线 RVD 对接受 Impella 支持的高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HRPCI)患者临床预后的影响尚不清楚:方法:Impella支持的HRPCI单臂多中心PROTECT III研究中的患者根据是否存在RVD进行了分层。RVD由超声心动图核心实验室进行定量评估,定义为分数面积变化< 35%、三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移< 17 mm或三尖瓣环外侧脉冲波多普勒S波< 9.5 cm/s。对手术结果、90 天主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE:全因死亡率、心肌梗死、中风/TIA 和重复血管再通的复合指标)和 1 年死亡率进行了评估:结果:在接受左心室功能评估的239名患者中,发现124名患者存在左心室功能障碍。左心室射血分数较低、血尿素氮水平较高和RV扩张较严重与RVD独立相关。PCI期间低血压发作的发生率、需要长时间Impella支持的患者比例、血管再通的完整性以及院内死亡率在有RVD与无RVD的患者之间没有显著差异。然而,有RVD的患者90天的MACCE率更高,在多变量Cox回归分析中,RVD是1年死亡率的有力预测因素:结论:在使用 Impella 进行 HRPCI 的患者中,RVD 与更晚期的双心室衰竭有关。HRPCI期间使用Impella支持可促进有效的血管再通,即使是那些同时存在RVD的患者也是如此。然而,RVD与不利的长期预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing High-Risk PCI with Impella

Background

Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is an important prognostic factor in several cardiac conditions, including acute and chronic heart failure. The impact of baseline RVD on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) supported by Impella is unknown.

Methods

Patients from the single-arm, multicenter PROTECT III study of Impella-supported HRPCI were stratified based on the presence or absence of RVD. RVD was quantitatively assessed by an echocardiography core laboratory and was defined as fractional area change < 35%, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion < 17 mm or pulsed-wave Doppler S-wave of the lateral tricuspid annulus < 9.5 cm/s. Procedural outcomes, 90-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA, and repeat revascularization), and 1-year mortality were assessed.

Results

Of the 239 patients who underwent RV function assessment, 124 were found to have RVD. Lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher blood urea nitrogen levels, and more severe RV dilation were independently associated with RVD. The incidence of hypotensive episodes during PCI, the proportion of patients requiring prolonged Impella support, the completeness of revascularization, and the rate of in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between patients with vs without RVD. However, 90-day MACCE rates were higher in those with RVD, and RVD was a robust predictor of 1-year mortality in multivariable Cox-regression analyses.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing HRPCI with Impella, RVD was associated with more advanced biventricular failure. The use of Impella support during HRPCI facilitated effective revascularization, even in those with concomitant RVD. Nevertheless, RVD was associated with unfavorable long-term prognoses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信