需要临时机械循环支持的心源性休克患者的抗凝药物、监测和疗效。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chirag Mehta MD , Brian Osorio MD , Neel R. Sodha MD , Halley C. Gibson PharmD , Annaliese Clancy PharmD , Athena Poppas MD , Omar N Hyder MD , Marwan Saad MD, PhD , Rachna Kataria MD , J. Dawn Abbott MD , Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula MD, MSc
{"title":"需要临时机械循环支持的心源性休克患者的抗凝药物、监测和疗效。","authors":"Chirag Mehta MD ,&nbsp;Brian Osorio MD ,&nbsp;Neel R. Sodha MD ,&nbsp;Halley C. Gibson PharmD ,&nbsp;Annaliese Clancy PharmD ,&nbsp;Athena Poppas MD ,&nbsp;Omar N Hyder MD ,&nbsp;Marwan Saad MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rachna Kataria MD ,&nbsp;J. Dawn Abbott MD ,&nbsp;Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a syndrome of low cardiac output resulting in critical end-organ hypoperfusion and hypoxia. The mainstay of management involves optimizing preload, afterload and contractility. In medically refractory cases, temporary percutaneous mechanical support (MCS) is used as a bridge to recovery, surgical ventricular assist device, or transplant. Anticoagulation is recommended to prevent device-related thromboembolism. However, MCS can be fraught with hemorrhagic complications, compounded by incident multisystem organ failure often complicating CS. Currently, there are limited data on optimal anticoagulation strategies that balance the risk of bleeding and thrombosis, with most centers adopting local antithrombotic stewardship practices. In this review, we detail anticoagulation protocols, including anticoagulation agents, therapeutic monitoring, and complication mitigation in CS requiring MCS. This review is intended to provide an evidence-based framework in this population at high risk for in-hospital bleeding and mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"30 10","pages":"Pages 1343-1354"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticoagulation Medications, Monitoring, and Outcomes in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support\",\"authors\":\"Chirag Mehta MD ,&nbsp;Brian Osorio MD ,&nbsp;Neel R. Sodha MD ,&nbsp;Halley C. Gibson PharmD ,&nbsp;Annaliese Clancy PharmD ,&nbsp;Athena Poppas MD ,&nbsp;Omar N Hyder MD ,&nbsp;Marwan Saad MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rachna Kataria MD ,&nbsp;J. Dawn Abbott MD ,&nbsp;Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.07.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a syndrome of low cardiac output resulting in critical end-organ hypoperfusion and hypoxia. The mainstay of management involves optimizing preload, afterload and contractility. In medically refractory cases, temporary percutaneous mechanical support (MCS) is used as a bridge to recovery, surgical ventricular assist device, or transplant. Anticoagulation is recommended to prevent device-related thromboembolism. However, MCS can be fraught with hemorrhagic complications, compounded by incident multisystem organ failure often complicating CS. Currently, there are limited data on optimal anticoagulation strategies that balance the risk of bleeding and thrombosis, with most centers adopting local antithrombotic stewardship practices. In this review, we detail anticoagulation protocols, including anticoagulation agents, therapeutic monitoring, and complication mitigation in CS requiring MCS. This review is intended to provide an evidence-based framework in this population at high risk for in-hospital bleeding and mortality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\"30 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1343-1354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107191642400277X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107191642400277X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心源性休克(CS)是一种心输出量低导致重要内脏器官灌注不足和缺氧的综合征。治疗的主要方法包括优化前负荷、后负荷和收缩力。在药物难治性病例中,临时经皮机械支持(MCS)被用作康复、外科心室辅助装置或移植的桥梁。建议进行抗凝治疗,以预防与装置相关的血栓栓塞。然而,MCS 可能充满出血并发症,加上 CS 常常并发多系统器官衰竭,情况更加复杂。目前,关于平衡出血和血栓风险的最佳抗凝策略的数据有限,大多数中心都采用了当地的抗血栓管理方法。在本综述中,我们详细介绍了抗凝方案,包括抗凝药物、治疗监测和需要 MCS 的 CS 的并发症缓解。本综述旨在为这一院内出血和死亡率高风险人群提供循证框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anticoagulation Medications, Monitoring, and Outcomes in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a syndrome of low cardiac output resulting in critical end-organ hypoperfusion and hypoxia. The mainstay of management involves optimizing preload, afterload and contractility. In medically refractory cases, temporary percutaneous mechanical support (MCS) is used as a bridge to recovery, surgical ventricular assist device, or transplant. Anticoagulation is recommended to prevent device-related thromboembolism. However, MCS can be fraught with hemorrhagic complications, compounded by incident multisystem organ failure often complicating CS. Currently, there are limited data on optimal anticoagulation strategies that balance the risk of bleeding and thrombosis, with most centers adopting local antithrombotic stewardship practices. In this review, we detail anticoagulation protocols, including anticoagulation agents, therapeutic monitoring, and complication mitigation in CS requiring MCS. This review is intended to provide an evidence-based framework in this population at high risk for in-hospital bleeding and mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信