{"title":"有限元分析表明，在狗的模型中，个性化小半月板切除-椎体后凸切除术和部分外侧椎体后凸切除术的稳定性差异极小。","authors":"Yuki Kikuchi, Masakazu Shimada, Fumitaka Takahashi, Shinya Yamaguchi, Yasushi Hara","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Use finite element analysis to evaluate the biomechanical effects of spinal decompression procedures in healthy Beagle dogs, comparing individualized mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy (iMHC), mini-hemilaminectomy, partial lateral corpectomy (PLC), and hemilaminectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A finite element model of the L1-L2 functional spinal unit was generated using CT data. For each decompression model, loads were applied in 0.2-Nm steps (maximum, 2.0 Nm) in 6 directions: flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. The L1 spinous process tip displacement angle was quantified numerically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 4 techniques, mini-hemilaminectomy exhibited the smallest displacement angles across all directions. Hemilaminectomy exhibited the largest displacement angles in extension, flexion, right rotation, and left rotation across all techniques. Left and right lateral bending displacement angles were marginally larger for iMHC than for hemilaminectomy at 0.4 Nm; however, at 2.0 Nm, displacement angles were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mini-hemilaminectomy minimizes functional spinal unit instability to the greatest extent. Hemilaminectomy is more unstable than iMHC and PLC in flexion, extension, and rotation. Mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy and PLC are more unstable than hemilaminectomy in lateral bending, with iMHC being slightly more unstable than PLC or nearly equal.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Mini-hemilaminectomy minimizes instability to the greatest extent in cases of ventrolateral spinal compression. In cases of ventral spinal compression, iMHC may be preferable to PLC for providing equivalent stability without impeding spinal cord visualization, but both techniques can cause instability depending on loading direction, so careful attention to postoperative instability is necessary when excessive vertebral body resection is involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite element analysis shows minimal stability difference between individualized mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy and partial lateral corpectomy in a dog model.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Kikuchi, Masakazu Shimada, Fumitaka Takahashi, Shinya Yamaguchi, Yasushi Hara\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Use finite element analysis to evaluate the biomechanical effects of spinal decompression procedures in healthy Beagle dogs, comparing individualized mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy (iMHC), mini-hemilaminectomy, partial lateral corpectomy (PLC), and hemilaminectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A finite element model of the L1-L2 functional spinal unit was generated using CT data. For each decompression model, loads were applied in 0.2-Nm steps (maximum, 2.0 Nm) in 6 directions: flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. The L1 spinous process tip displacement angle was quantified numerically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 4 techniques, mini-hemilaminectomy exhibited the smallest displacement angles across all directions. Hemilaminectomy exhibited the largest displacement angles in extension, flexion, right rotation, and left rotation across all techniques. Left and right lateral bending displacement angles were marginally larger for iMHC than for hemilaminectomy at 0.4 Nm; however, at 2.0 Nm, displacement angles were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mini-hemilaminectomy minimizes functional spinal unit instability to the greatest extent. Hemilaminectomy is more unstable than iMHC and PLC in flexion, extension, and rotation. Mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy and PLC are more unstable than hemilaminectomy in lateral bending, with iMHC being slightly more unstable than PLC or nearly equal.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Mini-hemilaminectomy minimizes instability to the greatest extent in cases of ventrolateral spinal compression. In cases of ventral spinal compression, iMHC may be preferable to PLC for providing equivalent stability without impeding spinal cord visualization, but both techniques can cause instability depending on loading direction, so careful attention to postoperative instability is necessary when excessive vertebral body resection is involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finite element analysis shows minimal stability difference between individualized mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy and partial lateral corpectomy in a dog model.
Objective: Use finite element analysis to evaluate the biomechanical effects of spinal decompression procedures in healthy Beagle dogs, comparing individualized mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy (iMHC), mini-hemilaminectomy, partial lateral corpectomy (PLC), and hemilaminectomy.
Methods: A finite element model of the L1-L2 functional spinal unit was generated using CT data. For each decompression model, loads were applied in 0.2-Nm steps (maximum, 2.0 Nm) in 6 directions: flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. The L1 spinous process tip displacement angle was quantified numerically.
Results: Among the 4 techniques, mini-hemilaminectomy exhibited the smallest displacement angles across all directions. Hemilaminectomy exhibited the largest displacement angles in extension, flexion, right rotation, and left rotation across all techniques. Left and right lateral bending displacement angles were marginally larger for iMHC than for hemilaminectomy at 0.4 Nm; however, at 2.0 Nm, displacement angles were similar.
Conclusions: Mini-hemilaminectomy minimizes functional spinal unit instability to the greatest extent. Hemilaminectomy is more unstable than iMHC and PLC in flexion, extension, and rotation. Mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy and PLC are more unstable than hemilaminectomy in lateral bending, with iMHC being slightly more unstable than PLC or nearly equal.
Clinical relevance: Mini-hemilaminectomy minimizes instability to the greatest extent in cases of ventrolateral spinal compression. In cases of ventral spinal compression, iMHC may be preferable to PLC for providing equivalent stability without impeding spinal cord visualization, but both techniques can cause instability depending on loading direction, so careful attention to postoperative instability is necessary when excessive vertebral body resection is involved.
期刊介绍：
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
