探究连接和外切酶消化在生物分析 RCA 检测中对非特异性扩增的作用

IF 3.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Analyst Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1039/D4AN00866A
Vandana Kuttappan Nair, Chandrika Sharma, Shrawan Kumar, Mrittika Sengupta and Souradyuti Ghosh
{"title":"探究连接和外切酶消化在生物分析 RCA 检测中对非特异性扩增的作用","authors":"Vandana Kuttappan Nair, Chandrika Sharma, Shrawan Kumar, Mrittika Sengupta and Souradyuti Ghosh","doi":"10.1039/D4AN00866A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Non-specific amplification (NSA, amplification in the absence of a target analyte) in bioanalytical rolling circle amplification (RCA) assays, especially those involving pre-synthesized circular DNA (cDNA), affects its analytical sensitivity. Despite extensive development of RCA-based bioanalytical methods, the NSA in RCA remains uncharacterized in terms of its magnitude or origin. NSA may originate from inefficient ligation or succeeding cDNA purification steps. This study comprehensively quantifies NSA across several ligation and digestion techniques for the first time since the innovation of RCA. To quantify the NSA in RCA, cDNAs were prepared using self-annealing, splint-padlock, or cohesive end ligations. The cDNAs were then subjected to nine different exonuclease digestion steps and quantified for NSA under linear as well as hyperbranched RCA conditions. We investigated buffer compositions, divalent ion concentrations, single or dual enzyme digestion, cohesive end lengths, and splint lengths. The optimized conditions successfully mitigated absolute NSA by 30–100-fold and relative NSA (normalized against primer-assisted RCA) to ∼5%. Besides understanding the mechanistic origin of NSA, novel aspects of enzyme–substrate selectivity, buffer composition, and the role of divalent ions were discovered. With increasing bioanalytical RCA applications, this study will help standardize NSA-free assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":63,"journal":{"name":"Analyst","volume":" 22","pages":" 5491-5503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probing the role of ligation and exonuclease digestion towards non-specific amplification in bioanalytical RCA assays†\",\"authors\":\"Vandana Kuttappan Nair, Chandrika Sharma, Shrawan Kumar, Mrittika Sengupta and Souradyuti Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4AN00866A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Non-specific amplification (NSA, amplification in the absence of a target analyte) in bioanalytical rolling circle amplification (RCA) assays, especially those involving pre-synthesized circular DNA (cDNA), affects its analytical sensitivity. Despite extensive development of RCA-based bioanalytical methods, the NSA in RCA remains uncharacterized in terms of its magnitude or origin. NSA may originate from inefficient ligation or succeeding cDNA purification steps. This study comprehensively quantifies NSA across several ligation and digestion techniques for the first time since the innovation of RCA. To quantify the NSA in RCA, cDNAs were prepared using self-annealing, splint-padlock, or cohesive end ligations. The cDNAs were then subjected to nine different exonuclease digestion steps and quantified for NSA under linear as well as hyperbranched RCA conditions. We investigated buffer compositions, divalent ion concentrations, single or dual enzyme digestion, cohesive end lengths, and splint lengths. The optimized conditions successfully mitigated absolute NSA by 30–100-fold and relative NSA (normalized against primer-assisted RCA) to ∼5%. Besides understanding the mechanistic origin of NSA, novel aspects of enzyme–substrate selectivity, buffer composition, and the role of divalent ions were discovered. With increasing bioanalytical RCA applications, this study will help standardize NSA-free assays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":63,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analyst\",\"volume\":\" 22\",\"pages\":\" 5491-5503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analyst\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/an/d4an00866a\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyst","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/an/d4an00866a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物分析滚动圈扩增(RCA)测定中的非特异性扩增(NSA,在没有目标分析物的情况下进行的扩增)会影响其分析灵敏度,特别是那些涉及预合成环状 DNA(cDNA)的测定。尽管基于 RCA 的生物分析方法得到了广泛的发展,但 RCA 中的 NSA 在程度或来源方面仍未定性。NSA 可能源于低效连接或后续的 cDNA 纯化步骤。自 RCA 创新以来,本研究首次全面量化了几种连接和消化技术中的 NSA。为了量化 RCA 中的 NSA,我们使用自退火、夹板锁或内聚端连接技术制备了 cDNA。然后对 cDNA 进行九种不同的外切酶消化步骤,并在线性和超支化 RCA 条件下对 NSA 进行量化。我们研究了缓冲液成分、二价离子浓度、单酶或双酶消化、内聚端长度和剪接长度。优化后的条件成功地将绝对 NSA 减少了 30-100 倍,将相对 NSA(与引物辅助 RCA 相比的归一化值)降低到 ∼5%。除了了解 NSA 的机理外,还发现了酶-底物选择性、缓冲液成分和二价离子作用等新的方面。随着生物分析 RCA 应用的不断增加,这项研究将有助于无 NSA 检测的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Probing the role of ligation and exonuclease digestion towards non-specific amplification in bioanalytical RCA assays†

Probing the role of ligation and exonuclease digestion towards non-specific amplification in bioanalytical RCA assays†

Non-specific amplification (NSA, amplification in the absence of a target analyte) in bioanalytical rolling circle amplification (RCA) assays, especially those involving pre-synthesized circular DNA (cDNA), affects its analytical sensitivity. Despite extensive development of RCA-based bioanalytical methods, the NSA in RCA remains uncharacterized in terms of its magnitude or origin. NSA may originate from inefficient ligation or succeeding cDNA purification steps. This study comprehensively quantifies NSA across several ligation and digestion techniques for the first time since the innovation of RCA. To quantify the NSA in RCA, cDNAs were prepared using self-annealing, splint-padlock, or cohesive end ligations. The cDNAs were then subjected to nine different exonuclease digestion steps and quantified for NSA under linear as well as hyperbranched RCA conditions. We investigated buffer compositions, divalent ion concentrations, single or dual enzyme digestion, cohesive end lengths, and splint lengths. The optimized conditions successfully mitigated absolute NSA by 30–100-fold and relative NSA (normalized against primer-assisted RCA) to ∼5%. Besides understanding the mechanistic origin of NSA, novel aspects of enzyme–substrate selectivity, buffer composition, and the role of divalent ions were discovered. With increasing bioanalytical RCA applications, this study will help standardize NSA-free assays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analyst
Analyst 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
636
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: "Analyst" journal is the home of premier fundamental discoveries, inventions and applications in the analytical and bioanalytical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信