Ivana Lukic, Veljko Blagojevic, Rajna Minic, Sasa Ivanovic, Suncica Borozan, Vitomir Cupic, Irena Zivkovic
{"title":"比较研究蝰蛇毒液的细胞毒性方法和抗蛇毒血清的抗毒性效力。","authors":"Ivana Lukic, Veljko Blagojevic, Rajna Minic, Sasa Ivanovic, Suncica Borozan, Vitomir Cupic, Irena Zivkovic","doi":"10.5114/ceji.2024.142417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alternative in vitro tests that can be used instead of animal experiments are those that can most closely evaluate the biological activity of the drug of interest. For testing the potency of antivenom, these are the methods used to assess cytotoxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the most commonly used cytotoxicity methods for determining the protective potency of the antivenom Viekvin, which neutralizes Vipera ammodytes venom.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The selected methods are based on different biological mechanisms: MTT assay, based on the activity of cell oxidoreductase enzymes; crystal violet staining, based on the degree of cell adhesion; trypan blue staining, based on cell membrane permeability, and propidium iodide staining, based on measurement of nucleic acids of dead cells. The pro-apoptotic effect of the venom was also determined with annexin V staining.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IC<sub>50</sub> value of V. ammodytes venom obtained by these methods was very similar, while the EC<sub>50</sub> values differed significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded that the choice of the method used to measure the anticytotoxic anti-venom potency depends on the immunogenicity of the venom components that cause cell death; for each venom/antivenom pair, it is necessary to select the appropriate assay separately, and at present, none of the standard cytotoxic methods can be universally applied to determine antivenom potency.</p>","PeriodicalId":9694,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Immunology","volume":"49 2","pages":"94-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cytotoxicity methods for studying <i>Vipera ammodytes</i> venom and the anticytotoxic potency of antivenom.\",\"authors\":\"Ivana Lukic, Veljko Blagojevic, Rajna Minic, Sasa Ivanovic, Suncica Borozan, Vitomir Cupic, Irena Zivkovic\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ceji.2024.142417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alternative in vitro tests that can be used instead of animal experiments are those that can most closely evaluate the biological activity of the drug of interest. For testing the potency of antivenom, these are the methods used to assess cytotoxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the most commonly used cytotoxicity methods for determining the protective potency of the antivenom Viekvin, which neutralizes Vipera ammodytes venom.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The selected methods are based on different biological mechanisms: MTT assay, based on the activity of cell oxidoreductase enzymes; crystal violet staining, based on the degree of cell adhesion; trypan blue staining, based on cell membrane permeability, and propidium iodide staining, based on measurement of nucleic acids of dead cells. The pro-apoptotic effect of the venom was also determined with annexin V staining.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IC<sub>50</sub> value of V. ammodytes venom obtained by these methods was very similar, while the EC<sub>50</sub> values differed significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded that the choice of the method used to measure the anticytotoxic anti-venom potency depends on the immunogenicity of the venom components that cause cell death; for each venom/antivenom pair, it is necessary to select the appropriate assay separately, and at present, none of the standard cytotoxic methods can be universally applied to determine antivenom potency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Immunology\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"94-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2024.142417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2024.142417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:可替代动物实验的体外试验是那些能最接近地评估相关药物生物活性的试验。在测试抗蛇毒血清的效力时,这些方法可用于评估细胞毒性。本研究的目的是评估最常用的细胞毒性方法,以确定中和蝰蛇毒液的抗蛇毒血清 Viekvin 的保护效力:所选方法基于不同的生物机制:MTT 试验基于细胞氧化还原酶的活性;水晶紫染色基于细胞粘附的程度;胰蓝染色基于细胞膜的通透性;碘化丙啶染色基于死亡细胞核酸的测量。此外,还利用附件素 V 染色法测定了毒液的促凋亡作用:结果:通过这些方法获得的蝰蛇毒液的 IC50 值非常相似,而 EC50 值则有很大差异:我们得出结论:选择哪种方法来测定抗毒血清的抗毒效力取决于导致细胞死亡的毒液成分的免疫原性;对于每种毒液/抗毒血清配对,有必要分别选择适当的测定方法,目前,没有一种标准的细胞毒性方法可以普遍用于测定抗毒血清的效力。
Comparison of cytotoxicity methods for studying Vipera ammodytes venom and the anticytotoxic potency of antivenom.
Introduction: Alternative in vitro tests that can be used instead of animal experiments are those that can most closely evaluate the biological activity of the drug of interest. For testing the potency of antivenom, these are the methods used to assess cytotoxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the most commonly used cytotoxicity methods for determining the protective potency of the antivenom Viekvin, which neutralizes Vipera ammodytes venom.
Material and methods: The selected methods are based on different biological mechanisms: MTT assay, based on the activity of cell oxidoreductase enzymes; crystal violet staining, based on the degree of cell adhesion; trypan blue staining, based on cell membrane permeability, and propidium iodide staining, based on measurement of nucleic acids of dead cells. The pro-apoptotic effect of the venom was also determined with annexin V staining.
Results: The IC50 value of V. ammodytes venom obtained by these methods was very similar, while the EC50 values differed significantly.
Conclusions: We concluded that the choice of the method used to measure the anticytotoxic anti-venom potency depends on the immunogenicity of the venom components that cause cell death; for each venom/antivenom pair, it is necessary to select the appropriate assay separately, and at present, none of the standard cytotoxic methods can be universally applied to determine antivenom potency.