CO-RADS 在血液透析患者 COVID-19 诊断中的表现。

Pervin Ozkan Kurtgoz, Fatih Sackan, Meral Buyukterzi, Ibrahim Guney
{"title":"CO-RADS 在血液透析患者 COVID-19 诊断中的表现。","authors":"Pervin Ozkan Kurtgoz, Fatih Sackan, Meral Buyukterzi, Ibrahim Guney","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Different data systems have been used to reach a common decision in the interpretation of chest computed tomography (CT) scans for the detection of COVID-19 infection. The aim of our study was to determine the usefulness of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) for COVID-19 in patients undergoing hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 90 hemodialysis patients who underwent chest CT and had samples available for real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The files of the patients were retrospectively reviewed and the data were recorded. Image interpretation and CO-RADS staging were performed retrospectively by two radiologists experienced in COVID-19 patients, blinded to the RT-PCR results. The RT-PCR results were then compared with the CO-RADS stages obtained. The success of CO-RADS in diagnosing COVID-19 was evaluated according to its prediction of a positive RT-PCR result. At the same time, the relationship between CO-RADS stages and prognosis was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups according to the RT-PCR results, of which 38 (42.2%) had positive results. Validity tests of CO-RADS were performed according to the RT-PCR test. While 71.1% of patients with CO-RADS ≥4 were RT-PCR (+), 13.2% of patients with CO-RADS ≤2 were RT-PCR (+) (p < 0.001). CO-RADS ≥4 detected COVID-19 with 71.1% sensitivity and 51.9% specificity. ROC analysis confirmed the diagnostic performance of CO-RADS for predicting RT-PCR positivity with AUC = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63-0.84). The relationship between CO-RADS stages and mortality was not significant (p = 0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CO-RADS is moderately sensitive and poorly specific for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients. In these patients, CO-RADS would be more useful to exclude other infections than to diagnose COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of CO-RADS in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Pervin Ozkan Kurtgoz, Fatih Sackan, Meral Buyukterzi, Ibrahim Guney\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-9987.14215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Different data systems have been used to reach a common decision in the interpretation of chest computed tomography (CT) scans for the detection of COVID-19 infection. The aim of our study was to determine the usefulness of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) for COVID-19 in patients undergoing hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 90 hemodialysis patients who underwent chest CT and had samples available for real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The files of the patients were retrospectively reviewed and the data were recorded. Image interpretation and CO-RADS staging were performed retrospectively by two radiologists experienced in COVID-19 patients, blinded to the RT-PCR results. The RT-PCR results were then compared with the CO-RADS stages obtained. The success of CO-RADS in diagnosing COVID-19 was evaluated according to its prediction of a positive RT-PCR result. At the same time, the relationship between CO-RADS stages and prognosis was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups according to the RT-PCR results, of which 38 (42.2%) had positive results. Validity tests of CO-RADS were performed according to the RT-PCR test. While 71.1% of patients with CO-RADS ≥4 were RT-PCR (+), 13.2% of patients with CO-RADS ≤2 were RT-PCR (+) (p < 0.001). CO-RADS ≥4 detected COVID-19 with 71.1% sensitivity and 51.9% specificity. ROC analysis confirmed the diagnostic performance of CO-RADS for predicting RT-PCR positivity with AUC = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63-0.84). The relationship between CO-RADS stages and mortality was not significant (p = 0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CO-RADS is moderately sensitive and poorly specific for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients. In these patients, CO-RADS would be more useful to exclude other infections than to diagnose COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在解释胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)以检测 COVID-19 感染时,不同的数据系统被用于达成共同的决定。我们的研究旨在确定 COVID-19 报告和数据系统(COVID-19 Reporting and Data System,CO-RADS)对血液透析患者 COVID-19 的有用性:我们纳入了 90 名接受过胸部 CT 并有样本可用于实时逆转录聚合酶链反应 (RT-PCR) 的血液透析患者。我们对患者的档案进行了回顾性审查,并记录了相关数据。图像解读和 CO-RADS 分期由两名对 COVID-19 患者有经验的放射科医生进行回顾性分析,RT-PCR 结果为盲法。然后将 RT-PCR 结果与 CO-RADS 分期结果进行比较。根据 CO-RADS 对 RT-PCR 阳性结果的预测,评估 CO-RADS 诊断 COVID-19 的成功率。同时,还评估了 CO-RADS 分期与预后之间的关系:根据 RT-PCR 结果将患者分为两组,其中 38 人(42.2%)为阳性结果。根据 RT-PCR 检测结果对 CO-RADS 进行了有效性测试。CO-RADS≥4的患者中71.1%为RT-PCR(+),而CO-RADS≤2的患者中13.2%为RT-PCR(+)(P 结论:CO-RADS的灵敏度为中度:CO-RADS 对血液透析患者 COVID-19 诊断的敏感性一般,特异性较差。在这些患者中,CO-RADS 对于排除其他感染比诊断 COVID-19 更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of CO-RADS in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients.

Introduction: Different data systems have been used to reach a common decision in the interpretation of chest computed tomography (CT) scans for the detection of COVID-19 infection. The aim of our study was to determine the usefulness of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) for COVID-19 in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Methods: We included 90 hemodialysis patients who underwent chest CT and had samples available for real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The files of the patients were retrospectively reviewed and the data were recorded. Image interpretation and CO-RADS staging were performed retrospectively by two radiologists experienced in COVID-19 patients, blinded to the RT-PCR results. The RT-PCR results were then compared with the CO-RADS stages obtained. The success of CO-RADS in diagnosing COVID-19 was evaluated according to its prediction of a positive RT-PCR result. At the same time, the relationship between CO-RADS stages and prognosis was also evaluated.

Results: Patients were divided into two groups according to the RT-PCR results, of which 38 (42.2%) had positive results. Validity tests of CO-RADS were performed according to the RT-PCR test. While 71.1% of patients with CO-RADS ≥4 were RT-PCR (+), 13.2% of patients with CO-RADS ≤2 were RT-PCR (+) (p < 0.001). CO-RADS ≥4 detected COVID-19 with 71.1% sensitivity and 51.9% specificity. ROC analysis confirmed the diagnostic performance of CO-RADS for predicting RT-PCR positivity with AUC = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63-0.84). The relationship between CO-RADS stages and mortality was not significant (p = 0.21).

Conclusion: CO-RADS is moderately sensitive and poorly specific for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients. In these patients, CO-RADS would be more useful to exclude other infections than to diagnose COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信