检测和治疗结节性硬化综合症引起的难治性癫痫发作的额叶反应性神经刺激:示例。

Paige J Brabant, Cameron P Beaudreault, Steven M Wolf, Patricia E McGoldrick, Saadi Ghatan, Carrie R Muh
{"title":"检测和治疗结节性硬化综合症引起的难治性癫痫发作的额叶反应性神经刺激:示例。","authors":"Paige J Brabant, Cameron P Beaudreault, Steven M Wolf, Patricia E McGoldrick, Saadi Ghatan, Carrie R Muh","doi":"10.3171/CASE23411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is often considered to be a palliative therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and is generally not considered to be a treatment for patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Here, the authors present the case of a 24-year-old male with TSC who obtained seizure freedom following RNS device implantation.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Prior to RNS device implantation, the patient underwent tuberectomies, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma resection, vagus nerve stimulator placement, and left frontal lobe resection but continued to have frequent seizures. An RNS device was implanted, which initially led to a decrease in seizures, but he continued to have 12 seizures per month. He then underwent lead revision for stimulation via a different electrode. After that lead change, he had no seizures for almost 3 years. In the following 3 years, he had two episodes of breakthrough seizures, both of which occurred with medication weans. Although the patient still requires antiseizure medication, he has had years of seizure freedom with RNS therapy.</p><p><strong>Lessons: </strong>This study exhibits the potential effectiveness of RNS therapy for patients with TSC and DRE. RNS should be considered for patients with TSC when other therapies have not sufficiently treated their epilepsy. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23411.</p>","PeriodicalId":94098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons","volume":"8 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsive neurostimulation of the frontal lobe for the detection and treatment of seizures in intractable epilepsy due to tuberous sclerosis complex: illustrative case.\",\"authors\":\"Paige J Brabant, Cameron P Beaudreault, Steven M Wolf, Patricia E McGoldrick, Saadi Ghatan, Carrie R Muh\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/CASE23411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is often considered to be a palliative therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and is generally not considered to be a treatment for patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Here, the authors present the case of a 24-year-old male with TSC who obtained seizure freedom following RNS device implantation.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Prior to RNS device implantation, the patient underwent tuberectomies, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma resection, vagus nerve stimulator placement, and left frontal lobe resection but continued to have frequent seizures. An RNS device was implanted, which initially led to a decrease in seizures, but he continued to have 12 seizures per month. He then underwent lead revision for stimulation via a different electrode. After that lead change, he had no seizures for almost 3 years. In the following 3 years, he had two episodes of breakthrough seizures, both of which occurred with medication weans. Although the patient still requires antiseizure medication, he has had years of seizure freedom with RNS therapy.</p><p><strong>Lessons: </strong>This study exhibits the potential effectiveness of RNS therapy for patients with TSC and DRE. RNS should be considered for patients with TSC when other therapies have not sufficiently treated their epilepsy. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23411.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons\",\"volume\":\"8 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE23411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE23411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:反应性神经刺激(RNS)通常被认为是治疗耐药性癫痫(DRE)的一种姑息疗法,一般不被认为是治疗结节性硬化综合征(TSC)患者的方法。在此,作者介绍了一名 24 岁男性 TSC 患者在植入 RNS 装置后获得癫痫发作自由的病例:在植入 RNS 装置之前,患者接受了管状切除术、独立绒毛膜下巨细胞星形细胞瘤切除术、迷走神经刺激器植入术和左额叶切除术,但癫痫仍然频繁发作。他植入了迷走神经刺激器,最初发作有所减少,但每月仍有 12 次发作。随后,他接受了导联修正,通过不同的电极进行刺激。更换导联后,他有将近 3 年的时间没有癫痫发作。在随后的 3 年中,他有过两次突破性癫痫发作,都是在断药之后发生的。虽然患者仍需服用抗癫痫药物,但他在接受 RNS 治疗后已多年无癫痫发作:这项研究表明,RNS疗法对TSC和DRE患者具有潜在疗效。https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23411。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responsive neurostimulation of the frontal lobe for the detection and treatment of seizures in intractable epilepsy due to tuberous sclerosis complex: illustrative case.

Background: Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is often considered to be a palliative therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and is generally not considered to be a treatment for patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Here, the authors present the case of a 24-year-old male with TSC who obtained seizure freedom following RNS device implantation.

Observations: Prior to RNS device implantation, the patient underwent tuberectomies, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma resection, vagus nerve stimulator placement, and left frontal lobe resection but continued to have frequent seizures. An RNS device was implanted, which initially led to a decrease in seizures, but he continued to have 12 seizures per month. He then underwent lead revision for stimulation via a different electrode. After that lead change, he had no seizures for almost 3 years. In the following 3 years, he had two episodes of breakthrough seizures, both of which occurred with medication weans. Although the patient still requires antiseizure medication, he has had years of seizure freedom with RNS therapy.

Lessons: This study exhibits the potential effectiveness of RNS therapy for patients with TSC and DRE. RNS should be considered for patients with TSC when other therapies have not sufficiently treated their epilepsy. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23411.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信