Mohammed A S Baraka, Ahmed A Abdelgoad, Mariam S Shadi
{"title":"声乐疲劳指数(VFI):阿拉伯语版本的跨文化适应性、验证和临界值。","authors":"Mohammed A S Baraka, Ahmed A Abdelgoad, Mariam S Shadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to validate, cross-culturally, and linguistically adapt the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) into Arabic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The VFI was translated into Arabic, reverse translated, and content validated. To assess its psychometric properties, 398 patients with voice disorders (199 males, 199 females, mean age=46.2 ± 15.0years) and 121 vocally healthy controls (57 males, 64 females, mean age=42.1 ± 6.9years) completed the VFI-Arabic. We calculated internal consistency and test-retest reliability using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Independent sample t tests determined mean factor score differences between groups, while receiver operator characteristic curves analyzed sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off scores for the three factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.95, across all factors combined, it was 0.68; and for factors 1, 2, and 3, it was 0.95, 0.91, and 0.91, respectively. Test-retest reliability for the subscales was excellent (ICC: 0.97, 0.91, 0.82 for factors 1, 2, and 3). Mean subscale scores were significantly higher in the voice-disordered group than in controls. The area under the curve for factors 1, 2, and 3 was 0.824, 0.759, and 0.646, respectively. Best cut-off scores were ≥14.5 (69.8% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity) for factor 1, ≥3.5 (66.3% sensitivity, 74.4% specificity) for factor 2, and ≥5.5 (60.1% sensitivity, 64.5% specificity) for factor 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VFI-Arabic is a valid and reliable tool for identifying and quantifying vocal fatigue symptoms in Arabic speakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Cut-off Values of the Arabic Version.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed A S Baraka, Ahmed A Abdelgoad, Mariam S Shadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to validate, cross-culturally, and linguistically adapt the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) into Arabic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The VFI was translated into Arabic, reverse translated, and content validated. To assess its psychometric properties, 398 patients with voice disorders (199 males, 199 females, mean age=46.2 ± 15.0years) and 121 vocally healthy controls (57 males, 64 females, mean age=42.1 ± 6.9years) completed the VFI-Arabic. We calculated internal consistency and test-retest reliability using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Independent sample t tests determined mean factor score differences between groups, while receiver operator characteristic curves analyzed sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off scores for the three factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.95, across all factors combined, it was 0.68; and for factors 1, 2, and 3, it was 0.95, 0.91, and 0.91, respectively. Test-retest reliability for the subscales was excellent (ICC: 0.97, 0.91, 0.82 for factors 1, 2, and 3). Mean subscale scores were significantly higher in the voice-disordered group than in controls. The area under the curve for factors 1, 2, and 3 was 0.824, 0.759, and 0.646, respectively. Best cut-off scores were ≥14.5 (69.8% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity) for factor 1, ≥3.5 (66.3% sensitivity, 74.4% specificity) for factor 2, and ≥5.5 (60.1% sensitivity, 64.5% specificity) for factor 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VFI-Arabic is a valid and reliable tool for identifying and quantifying vocal fatigue symptoms in Arabic speakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Cut-off Values of the Arabic Version.
Objective: This study aims to validate, cross-culturally, and linguistically adapt the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) into Arabic.
Study design: Cross-sectional study.
Methods: The VFI was translated into Arabic, reverse translated, and content validated. To assess its psychometric properties, 398 patients with voice disorders (199 males, 199 females, mean age=46.2 ± 15.0years) and 121 vocally healthy controls (57 males, 64 females, mean age=42.1 ± 6.9years) completed the VFI-Arabic. We calculated internal consistency and test-retest reliability using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Independent sample t tests determined mean factor score differences between groups, while receiver operator characteristic curves analyzed sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off scores for the three factors.
Results: The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.95, across all factors combined, it was 0.68; and for factors 1, 2, and 3, it was 0.95, 0.91, and 0.91, respectively. Test-retest reliability for the subscales was excellent (ICC: 0.97, 0.91, 0.82 for factors 1, 2, and 3). Mean subscale scores were significantly higher in the voice-disordered group than in controls. The area under the curve for factors 1, 2, and 3 was 0.824, 0.759, and 0.646, respectively. Best cut-off scores were ≥14.5 (69.8% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity) for factor 1, ≥3.5 (66.3% sensitivity, 74.4% specificity) for factor 2, and ≥5.5 (60.1% sensitivity, 64.5% specificity) for factor 3.
Conclusion: The VFI-Arabic is a valid and reliable tool for identifying and quantifying vocal fatigue symptoms in Arabic speakers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.