Laura Medlock, Dhekra Al-Basha, Adel Halawa, Christopher Dedek, Stéphanie Ratté, Steven A Prescott
{"title":"啮齿动物无毛皮肤机械感受器对振动触觉刺激的编码","authors":"Laura Medlock, Dhekra Al-Basha, Adel Halawa, Christopher Dedek, Stéphanie Ratté, Steven A Prescott","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1252-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Somatosensory coding in rodents has been mostly studied in the whisker system and hairy skin, whereas the function of low-threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs) in the rodent glabrous skin has received scant attention, unlike in primates where the glabrous skin has been the focus. The relative activation of different LTMR subtypes carries information about vibrotactile stimuli, as does the rate and temporal patterning of LTMR spikes. Rate coding depends on the probability of a spike occurring on each stimulus cycle (reliability), whereas temporal coding depends on the timing of spikes relative to the stimulus cycle (precision). Using in vivo extracellular recordings in male rats and mice of either sex, we measured the reliability and precision of LTMR responses to tactile stimuli including sustained pressure and vibration. Similar to other species, rodent LTMRs were separated into rapid-adapting (RA) or slow-adapting based on their response to sustained pressure. However, unlike the dichotomous frequency preference characteristic of RA1 and RA2/Pacinian afferents in other species, rodent RAs fell along a continuum. Fitting generalized linear models to experimental data reproduced the reliability and precision of rodent RAs. The resulting model parameters highlight key mechanistic differences across the RA spectrum; specifically, the integration window of different RAs transitions from wide to narrow as tuning preferences across the population move from low to high frequencies. Our results show that rodent RAs can support both rate and temporal coding, but their heterogeneity suggests that coactivation patterns play a greater role in population coding than for dichotomously tuned primate RAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encoding of Vibrotactile Stimuli by Mechanoreceptors in Rodent Glabrous Skin.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Medlock, Dhekra Al-Basha, Adel Halawa, Christopher Dedek, Stéphanie Ratté, Steven A Prescott\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1252-24.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Somatosensory coding in rodents has been mostly studied in the whisker system and hairy skin, whereas the function of low-threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs) in the rodent glabrous skin has received scant attention, unlike in primates where the glabrous skin has been the focus. The relative activation of different LTMR subtypes carries information about vibrotactile stimuli, as does the rate and temporal patterning of LTMR spikes. Rate coding depends on the probability of a spike occurring on each stimulus cycle (reliability), whereas temporal coding depends on the timing of spikes relative to the stimulus cycle (precision). Using in vivo extracellular recordings in male rats and mice of either sex, we measured the reliability and precision of LTMR responses to tactile stimuli including sustained pressure and vibration. Similar to other species, rodent LTMRs were separated into rapid-adapting (RA) or slow-adapting based on their response to sustained pressure. However, unlike the dichotomous frequency preference characteristic of RA1 and RA2/Pacinian afferents in other species, rodent RAs fell along a continuum. Fitting generalized linear models to experimental data reproduced the reliability and precision of rodent RAs. The resulting model parameters highlight key mechanistic differences across the RA spectrum; specifically, the integration window of different RAs transitions from wide to narrow as tuning preferences across the population move from low to high frequencies. Our results show that rodent RAs can support both rate and temporal coding, but their heterogeneity suggests that coactivation patterns play a greater role in population coding than for dichotomously tuned primate RAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1252-24.2024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1252-24.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对啮齿类动物体感编码的研究主要集中在胡须系统和有毛皮肤上,而对啮齿类动物无毛皮肤上的低阈机械感受器(LTMR)的功能却很少关注,这与灵长类动物无毛皮肤是研究重点不同。不同 LTMR 亚型的相对激活以及 LTMR 尖峰的速率和时间模式都含有振动触觉刺激的信息。速率编码取决于每个刺激周期出现尖峰的概率(可靠性),而时间编码则取决于尖峰相对于刺激周期的时间(精确性)。通过对雄性大鼠和雌性小鼠进行体内细胞外记录,我们测量了LTMR对触觉刺激(包括持续压力和振动)反应的可靠性和精确性。与其他物种类似,啮齿动物的 LTMR 也根据其对持续压力的反应分为快速适应型(RA)和慢速适应型(SA)。然而,与其他物种中 RA1 和 RA2/Pacinian 传入器的二分频率偏好特征不同,啮齿动物的 RA 沿着一个连续体分布。将广义线性模型(GLM)拟合到实验数据中,再现了啮齿动物 RA 的可靠性和精确性。由此得出的模型参数凸显了整个 RA 频谱的关键机制差异;具体来说,随着整个种群的调谐偏好从低频向高频移动,不同 RA 的整合窗口也从宽阔过渡到狭窄。我们的研究结果表明,啮齿类动物的RA既能支持速率编码,也能支持时间编码,但它们的异质性表明,与二分调谐的灵长类RA相比,共激活模式在群体编码中发挥着更大的作用。尽管在其他物种(如灵长类动物)中各种纤维类型的反应特性已得到充分证实,但在大鼠和小鼠中的定量特征描述却很有限。为了填补这一空白,我们对啮齿动物无毛皮肤触觉纤维的编码特性进行了全面的电生理学研究,然后模拟了这些纤维,以解释其反应的差异。我们的研究表明,啮齿动物的触觉纤维与其他物种的触觉纤维相似,但它们在群体水平上的异质性可能有所不同,这对触觉编码可能具有重要影响。模拟揭示了支持这种异质性的内在机制,并为探索啮齿动物的躯体感觉提供了有用的工具。
Encoding of Vibrotactile Stimuli by Mechanoreceptors in Rodent Glabrous Skin.
Somatosensory coding in rodents has been mostly studied in the whisker system and hairy skin, whereas the function of low-threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs) in the rodent glabrous skin has received scant attention, unlike in primates where the glabrous skin has been the focus. The relative activation of different LTMR subtypes carries information about vibrotactile stimuli, as does the rate and temporal patterning of LTMR spikes. Rate coding depends on the probability of a spike occurring on each stimulus cycle (reliability), whereas temporal coding depends on the timing of spikes relative to the stimulus cycle (precision). Using in vivo extracellular recordings in male rats and mice of either sex, we measured the reliability and precision of LTMR responses to tactile stimuli including sustained pressure and vibration. Similar to other species, rodent LTMRs were separated into rapid-adapting (RA) or slow-adapting based on their response to sustained pressure. However, unlike the dichotomous frequency preference characteristic of RA1 and RA2/Pacinian afferents in other species, rodent RAs fell along a continuum. Fitting generalized linear models to experimental data reproduced the reliability and precision of rodent RAs. The resulting model parameters highlight key mechanistic differences across the RA spectrum; specifically, the integration window of different RAs transitions from wide to narrow as tuning preferences across the population move from low to high frequencies. Our results show that rodent RAs can support both rate and temporal coding, but their heterogeneity suggests that coactivation patterns play a greater role in population coding than for dichotomously tuned primate RAs.
期刊介绍:
JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles