美国腭裂婴幼儿的耳科和听力护理现状。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Ursula M Findlen, Anna Meehan, Gregory Allen, Deborah S F Kacmarynski, Jonathan Grischkan, Emily C Nightengale, Lauren C Alexander, Sarah Hatch Pollard, Adriane L Baylis
{"title":"美国腭裂婴幼儿的耳科和听力护理现状。","authors":"Ursula M Findlen, Anna Meehan, Gregory Allen, Deborah S F Kacmarynski, Jonathan Grischkan, Emily C Nightengale, Lauren C Alexander, Sarah Hatch Pollard, Adriane L Baylis","doi":"10.1177/10556656241283535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine ear and hearing clinical practices across American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-site prospective, observational, longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventeen Cleft Palate Teams in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>Children with cleft palate, with or without cleft lip (CP ± L), born between 2015 and 2022, evaluated by 18 months (n = 1246).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Standard of care otolaryngology and audiology appointments evaluated in the context of whether otolaryngology and audiology services were provided as embedded care within the team visit or as ancillary services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 71% of infants passed newborn hearing screening (NBHS). By age 18 months, only 40% of infants received audiologic follow-up while 93.6% of children received otolaryngology care. Follow-up was significantly better for infants served by teams with embedded providers versus those who refer families for ancillary services; the odds of seeing an audiologist by 18 months were three times as high among participants seen by teams with embedded audiology (OR = 3.25; CI = 2.0, 5.2) while those seen by teams with embedded otolaryngologists had more than double the odds of seeing an otolaryngologist by 18 months (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.5, 3.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is considerable variability across ACPA-approved centers in the US regarding the timing and completion of otolaryngology and audiologic follow-up for children with CP ± L. This study highlights the importance of following established standards of care and the impact that team composition and access to clinical services can have on equity of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Ear and Hearing Care Practices for Infants and Toddlers with Cleft Palate in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ursula M Findlen, Anna Meehan, Gregory Allen, Deborah S F Kacmarynski, Jonathan Grischkan, Emily C Nightengale, Lauren C Alexander, Sarah Hatch Pollard, Adriane L Baylis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241283535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine ear and hearing clinical practices across American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-site prospective, observational, longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventeen Cleft Palate Teams in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>Children with cleft palate, with or without cleft lip (CP ± L), born between 2015 and 2022, evaluated by 18 months (n = 1246).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Standard of care otolaryngology and audiology appointments evaluated in the context of whether otolaryngology and audiology services were provided as embedded care within the team visit or as ancillary services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 71% of infants passed newborn hearing screening (NBHS). By age 18 months, only 40% of infants received audiologic follow-up while 93.6% of children received otolaryngology care. Follow-up was significantly better for infants served by teams with embedded providers versus those who refer families for ancillary services; the odds of seeing an audiologist by 18 months were three times as high among participants seen by teams with embedded audiology (OR = 3.25; CI = 2.0, 5.2) while those seen by teams with embedded otolaryngologists had more than double the odds of seeing an otolaryngologist by 18 months (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.5, 3.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is considerable variability across ACPA-approved centers in the US regarding the timing and completion of otolaryngology and audiologic follow-up for children with CP ± L. This study highlights the importance of following established standards of care and the impact that team composition and access to clinical services can have on equity of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241283535\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241283535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究美国腭裂颅面协会(ACPA)认可的美国团队的耳科和听力临床实践:多地点前瞻性观察纵向研究:研究地点:美国的 17 个腭裂小组:干预措施: 无:无:根据耳鼻喉科和听力科服务是作为团队就诊中的嵌入式护理还是作为辅助服务提供,对耳鼻喉科和听力科就诊标准进行评估:超过 71% 的婴儿通过了新生儿听力筛查 (NBHS)。到 18 个月大时,只有 40% 的婴儿接受了听力随访,而 93.6% 的儿童接受了耳鼻喉科护理。与转介家庭接受辅助服务的团队相比,由嵌入式医疗服务提供者提供服务的团队为婴儿提供的随访服务要好得多;由嵌入式听力学团队提供服务的参与者在 18 个月前看听力学家的几率是嵌入式听力学团队的三倍(OR = 3.25;CI = 2.0,5.2),而由嵌入式耳鼻喉学家团队提供服务的参与者在 18 个月前看耳鼻喉学家的几率是嵌入式听力学团队的两倍多(OR = 2.2;CI = 1.5,3.2):美国经ACPA批准的中心在CP±L儿童耳鼻喉科和听力随访的时间和完成方面存在很大差异。本研究强调了遵循既定护理标准的重要性,以及团队组成和临床服务获取途径对护理公平性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Ear and Hearing Care Practices for Infants and Toddlers with Cleft Palate in the United States.

Objective: To examine ear and hearing clinical practices across American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams in the United States.

Design: Multi-site prospective, observational, longitudinal study.

Setting: Seventeen Cleft Palate Teams in the United States.

Patients, participants: Children with cleft palate, with or without cleft lip (CP ± L), born between 2015 and 2022, evaluated by 18 months (n = 1246).

Interventions: None.

Main outcome measure(s): Standard of care otolaryngology and audiology appointments evaluated in the context of whether otolaryngology and audiology services were provided as embedded care within the team visit or as ancillary services.

Results: Over 71% of infants passed newborn hearing screening (NBHS). By age 18 months, only 40% of infants received audiologic follow-up while 93.6% of children received otolaryngology care. Follow-up was significantly better for infants served by teams with embedded providers versus those who refer families for ancillary services; the odds of seeing an audiologist by 18 months were three times as high among participants seen by teams with embedded audiology (OR = 3.25; CI = 2.0, 5.2) while those seen by teams with embedded otolaryngologists had more than double the odds of seeing an otolaryngologist by 18 months (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.5, 3.2).

Conclusions: There is considerable variability across ACPA-approved centers in the US regarding the timing and completion of otolaryngology and audiologic follow-up for children with CP ± L. This study highlights the importance of following established standards of care and the impact that team composition and access to clinical services can have on equity of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信