小儿鼻衄的门诊治疗:成本分析和临床模型。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Joshua A. Lee MD, Christopher Puchi MD, Kathleen R. Billings MD, Jennifer M. Lavin MD, MS, Inbal Hazkani MD, Carole Glennon RN, MSN, CPN, Dana M. Thompson MD, MS, MBA, John Maddalozzo MD
{"title":"小儿鼻衄的门诊治疗:成本分析和临床模型。","authors":"Joshua A. Lee MD,&nbsp;Christopher Puchi MD,&nbsp;Kathleen R. Billings MD,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Lavin MD, MS,&nbsp;Inbal Hazkani MD,&nbsp;Carole Glennon RN, MSN, CPN,&nbsp;Dana M. Thompson MD, MS, MBA,&nbsp;John Maddalozzo MD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.1310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective(s)</h3>\n \n <p>Pediatric epistaxis is a common, often non-operative condition encountered by Otolaryngologists. The present study seeks to (1) describe our outcomes of epistaxis management, (2) estimate the associated healthcare burden, and (3) propose a clinical model to optimize care coordination with primary care and advanced practice providers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective case series of pediatric patients treated outpatient for epistaxis by a single otolaryngologist from 2021 to 2022. The primary outcome after treatment with nasal lubricants was defined as (1) refractory epistaxis, (2) improvement, or (3) complete resolution. Cost data for office versus operative nasal cautery were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 122 patients were included for analysis. Over a follow-up duration of 20.5 months (IQR 8–36), 24.6% of patients experienced refractory epistaxis, 41.8% of patients found improvement, and 33.6% had complete resolution (<i>n</i> = 122). Refractory epistaxis was associated with a family history of coagulopathy (<i>p</i> = .007), daily epistaxis episodes (<i>p</i> = .043), and anemia (<i>p</i> &lt;.001). Average direct hospital costs associated with nasal cautery were $187 for in-office cauterization and $2179 for intraoperative cauterization. Estimated patient/third party payors savings were $1617 and $15,412 for in-office and intraoperative procedures, respectively, and $541.59 for specialty office visits alone. The average charge for laboratory work-up was $576.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 75% of patients with epistaxis experienced improvement or resolution of symptoms with nasal lubrication alone. Refractory epistaxis was associated with a family history of coagulopathy, daily epistaxis episodes, and anemia. Otolaryngology visits for epistaxis were associated with a direct healthcare expense burden. Adaptation of our clinical model may mitigate these costs while improving patient care.</p>\n \n <p><b>Level of Evidence</b>: 4.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient management of pediatric epistaxis: A cost analysis and clinical model\",\"authors\":\"Joshua A. Lee MD,&nbsp;Christopher Puchi MD,&nbsp;Kathleen R. Billings MD,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Lavin MD, MS,&nbsp;Inbal Hazkani MD,&nbsp;Carole Glennon RN, MSN, CPN,&nbsp;Dana M. Thompson MD, MS, MBA,&nbsp;John Maddalozzo MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.1310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective(s)</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pediatric epistaxis is a common, often non-operative condition encountered by Otolaryngologists. The present study seeks to (1) describe our outcomes of epistaxis management, (2) estimate the associated healthcare burden, and (3) propose a clinical model to optimize care coordination with primary care and advanced practice providers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective case series of pediatric patients treated outpatient for epistaxis by a single otolaryngologist from 2021 to 2022. The primary outcome after treatment with nasal lubricants was defined as (1) refractory epistaxis, (2) improvement, or (3) complete resolution. Cost data for office versus operative nasal cautery were analyzed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 122 patients were included for analysis. Over a follow-up duration of 20.5 months (IQR 8–36), 24.6% of patients experienced refractory epistaxis, 41.8% of patients found improvement, and 33.6% had complete resolution (<i>n</i> = 122). Refractory epistaxis was associated with a family history of coagulopathy (<i>p</i> = .007), daily epistaxis episodes (<i>p</i> = .043), and anemia (<i>p</i> &lt;.001). Average direct hospital costs associated with nasal cautery were $187 for in-office cauterization and $2179 for intraoperative cauterization. Estimated patient/third party payors savings were $1617 and $15,412 for in-office and intraoperative procedures, respectively, and $541.59 for specialty office visits alone. The average charge for laboratory work-up was $576.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Approximately 75% of patients with epistaxis experienced improvement or resolution of symptoms with nasal lubrication alone. Refractory epistaxis was associated with a family history of coagulopathy, daily epistaxis episodes, and anemia. Otolaryngology visits for epistaxis were associated with a direct healthcare expense burden. Adaptation of our clinical model may mitigate these costs while improving patient care.</p>\\n \\n <p><b>Level of Evidence</b>: 4.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.1310\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.1310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:小儿鼻衄是耳鼻喉科医生经常遇到的非手术治疗情况。本研究旨在:(1) 描述我们对鼻衄治疗的结果;(2) 估算相关的医疗负担;(3) 提出一种临床模式,以优化与初级保健和高级医疗服务提供者之间的护理协调:回顾性病例系列:2021 年至 2022 年期间,由一位耳鼻喉科医生在门诊治疗鼻衄的儿科患者。使用鼻腔润滑剂治疗后的主要结果定义为:(1) 难治性鼻衄;(2) 好转;或 (3) 完全缓解。此外,还分析了诊室鼻腔烧灼术与手术鼻腔烧灼术的成本数据:共有 122 名患者被纳入分析范围。在 20.5 个月(IQR 8-36)的随访期间,24.6% 的患者出现难治性鼻衄,41.8% 的患者病情有所好转,33.6% 的患者病情完全缓解(n = 122)。难治性鼻衄与凝血病家族史(p = .007)、每日鼻衄发作(p = .043)和贫血(p 结论:难治性鼻衄与凝血病家族史、每日鼻衄发作和贫血有关:约 75% 的鼻衄患者仅通过鼻腔润滑就能改善或缓解症状。难治性鼻衄与凝血病家族史、每日鼻衄发作和贫血有关。因鼻衄而到耳鼻喉科就诊与直接的医疗费用负担有关。调整我们的临床模式可减轻这些费用,同时改善患者护理。证据等级:4.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outpatient management of pediatric epistaxis: A cost analysis and clinical model

Objective(s)

Pediatric epistaxis is a common, often non-operative condition encountered by Otolaryngologists. The present study seeks to (1) describe our outcomes of epistaxis management, (2) estimate the associated healthcare burden, and (3) propose a clinical model to optimize care coordination with primary care and advanced practice providers.

Methods

Retrospective case series of pediatric patients treated outpatient for epistaxis by a single otolaryngologist from 2021 to 2022. The primary outcome after treatment with nasal lubricants was defined as (1) refractory epistaxis, (2) improvement, or (3) complete resolution. Cost data for office versus operative nasal cautery were analyzed.

Results

In total, 122 patients were included for analysis. Over a follow-up duration of 20.5 months (IQR 8–36), 24.6% of patients experienced refractory epistaxis, 41.8% of patients found improvement, and 33.6% had complete resolution (n = 122). Refractory epistaxis was associated with a family history of coagulopathy (p = .007), daily epistaxis episodes (p = .043), and anemia (p <.001). Average direct hospital costs associated with nasal cautery were $187 for in-office cauterization and $2179 for intraoperative cauterization. Estimated patient/third party payors savings were $1617 and $15,412 for in-office and intraoperative procedures, respectively, and $541.59 for specialty office visits alone. The average charge for laboratory work-up was $576.

Conclusion

Approximately 75% of patients with epistaxis experienced improvement or resolution of symptoms with nasal lubrication alone. Refractory epistaxis was associated with a family history of coagulopathy, daily epistaxis episodes, and anemia. Otolaryngology visits for epistaxis were associated with a direct healthcare expense burden. Adaptation of our clinical model may mitigate these costs while improving patient care.

Level of Evidence: 4.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信