下颌骨骨折弓形固定术中口腔外下颌神经阻滞与口腔内下颌神经阻滞疗效比较研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1007/s12663-024-02306-1
Monika Gupta, Aaquib Nazir, Atul Sharma, Amit Bali
{"title":"下颌骨骨折弓形固定术中口腔外下颌神经阻滞与口腔内下颌神经阻滞疗效比较研究。","authors":"Monika Gupta, Aaquib Nazir, Atul Sharma, Amit Bali","doi":"10.1007/s12663-024-02306-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of extra-oral mandibular nerve block (infra-zygomatic approach/lateral approach) vs. intra-oral (Gow-Gates) mandibular nerve block in arch bar fixation for management of mandibular fractures.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 200 patients reported with maxillofacial fractures. Out of them, 50 patients who required arch bar fixation for management of mandibular fractures were divided into two groups: Group I: Extra-oral and Group II: Intra-oral mandibular nerve blocks. The intra-operative pain, time of onset of anaesthesia, volume of drug administered, depth of needle insertion, repetition of injections and postoperative complications were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group I (Extra-oral nerve block), the time of onset of anaesthesia, volume of anaesthesia administered, needle depth, number of repetition of injections and postoperative complications were more as compared to Group II. No significant difference was observed in intra-operative pain score between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intra-oral approach with Gow-Gates technique seemed to be efficient and easy to operate as compared to extra-oral approach, for arch bar fixation of mandibular fractures in an output door setting, as extra-oral approach is more technique-sensitive and may lead to certain complications which require operation theatre setting with medical attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Efficacy for Extra-Oral vs. Intra-Oral Mandibular Nerve Block in Arch Bar Fixation for Management of Mandibular Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Monika Gupta, Aaquib Nazir, Atul Sharma, Amit Bali\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12663-024-02306-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of extra-oral mandibular nerve block (infra-zygomatic approach/lateral approach) vs. intra-oral (Gow-Gates) mandibular nerve block in arch bar fixation for management of mandibular fractures.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 200 patients reported with maxillofacial fractures. Out of them, 50 patients who required arch bar fixation for management of mandibular fractures were divided into two groups: Group I: Extra-oral and Group II: Intra-oral mandibular nerve blocks. The intra-operative pain, time of onset of anaesthesia, volume of drug administered, depth of needle insertion, repetition of injections and postoperative complications were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group I (Extra-oral nerve block), the time of onset of anaesthesia, volume of anaesthesia administered, needle depth, number of repetition of injections and postoperative complications were more as compared to Group II. No significant difference was observed in intra-operative pain score between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intra-oral approach with Gow-Gates technique seemed to be efficient and easy to operate as compared to extra-oral approach, for arch bar fixation of mandibular fractures in an output door setting, as extra-oral approach is more technique-sensitive and may lead to certain complications which require operation theatre setting with medical attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02306-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02306-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该研究旨在评估和比较下颌神经口外阻滞(颧下入路/外侧入路)与下颌神经口内阻滞(Gow-Gates)在下颌骨骨折弓形固定术中的疗效:共有 200 名颌面部骨折患者。其中,50 名下颌骨骨折患者需要接受弓形固定治疗,他们被分为两组:第一组:口外下颌神经阻滞;第二组:口内下颌神经阻滞。对术中疼痛、麻醉开始时间、给药量、针插入深度、重复注射和术后并发症进行了分析:结果:与第二组相比,第一组(口外神经阻滞)的麻醉开始时间、用药量、针刺深度、重复注射次数和术后并发症更多。两组术中疼痛评分无明显差异:结论:与口外方法相比,采用高-盖茨技术的口内方法在输出门环境下进行下颌骨骨折的弓形固定似乎更有效、更易于操作,因为口外方法对技术更敏感,可能会导致某些并发症,需要在手术室环境下进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Efficacy for Extra-Oral vs. Intra-Oral Mandibular Nerve Block in Arch Bar Fixation for Management of Mandibular Fractures.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of extra-oral mandibular nerve block (infra-zygomatic approach/lateral approach) vs. intra-oral (Gow-Gates) mandibular nerve block in arch bar fixation for management of mandibular fractures.

Methodology: A total of 200 patients reported with maxillofacial fractures. Out of them, 50 patients who required arch bar fixation for management of mandibular fractures were divided into two groups: Group I: Extra-oral and Group II: Intra-oral mandibular nerve blocks. The intra-operative pain, time of onset of anaesthesia, volume of drug administered, depth of needle insertion, repetition of injections and postoperative complications were analysed.

Results: In Group I (Extra-oral nerve block), the time of onset of anaesthesia, volume of anaesthesia administered, needle depth, number of repetition of injections and postoperative complications were more as compared to Group II. No significant difference was observed in intra-operative pain score between two groups.

Conclusion: Intra-oral approach with Gow-Gates technique seemed to be efficient and easy to operate as compared to extra-oral approach, for arch bar fixation of mandibular fractures in an output door setting, as extra-oral approach is more technique-sensitive and may lead to certain complications which require operation theatre setting with medical attention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信