使用非穿戴式设备监测心率和呼吸频率的可行性及测量参数的一致性:试点可行性研究。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.2196/56547
Kasumi Ikuta, Miya Aishima, Maiko Noguchi-Watanabe, Sakiko Fukui
{"title":"使用非穿戴式设备监测心率和呼吸频率的可行性及测量参数的一致性:试点可行性研究。","authors":"Kasumi Ikuta, Miya Aishima, Maiko Noguchi-Watanabe, Sakiko Fukui","doi":"10.2196/56547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As Japan is the world's fastest-aging society with a declining population, it is challenging to secure human resources for care providers. Therefore, the Japanese government is promoting digital transformation and the use of nursing care equipment, including nonwearable devices that monitor heart and respiratory rates. However, the feasibility of monitoring heart and respiratory rates with nonwearable devices and the consistency of the rates measured have not been reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we focused on a sheet-type nonwearable device (Safety Sheep Sensor) introduced in many nursing homes. We evaluated the feasibility of monitoring heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) continuously using nonwearable devices and the consistency of the HR and RR measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sheet-type nonwearable device that measured HR and RR every minute through body vibrations was placed under the mattress of each participant. The participants in study 1 were healthy individuals aged 20-60 years (n=21), while those in study 2 were older adults living in multidwelling houses and required nursing care (n=20). The HR was measured using standard methods by the nurse and using the wearable device (Silmee Bar-type Lite sensor), and RR was measured by the nurse. The primary outcome was the mean difference in HR and RR between nonwearable devices and standard methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference in HR was -0.32 (SD 3.12) in study 1 and 0.04 (SD: 3.98) in study 2; both the differences were within the predefined accepted discrepancies (<5 beats/min). The mean difference in RR was -0.98 (SD 3.01) in study 1 and -0.49 (SD 2.40) in study 2; both the differences were within the predefined accepted discrepancies (3 breaths/min).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HR and RR measurements obtained using the nonwearable devices and the standard method were similar. Continuous monitoring of vital signs using nonwearable devices can aid in the early detection of abnormal conditions in older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e56547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11479369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Monitoring Heart and Respiratory Rates Using Nonwearable Devices and Consistency of the Measured Parameters: Pilot Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kasumi Ikuta, Miya Aishima, Maiko Noguchi-Watanabe, Sakiko Fukui\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/56547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As Japan is the world's fastest-aging society with a declining population, it is challenging to secure human resources for care providers. Therefore, the Japanese government is promoting digital transformation and the use of nursing care equipment, including nonwearable devices that monitor heart and respiratory rates. However, the feasibility of monitoring heart and respiratory rates with nonwearable devices and the consistency of the rates measured have not been reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we focused on a sheet-type nonwearable device (Safety Sheep Sensor) introduced in many nursing homes. We evaluated the feasibility of monitoring heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) continuously using nonwearable devices and the consistency of the HR and RR measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sheet-type nonwearable device that measured HR and RR every minute through body vibrations was placed under the mattress of each participant. The participants in study 1 were healthy individuals aged 20-60 years (n=21), while those in study 2 were older adults living in multidwelling houses and required nursing care (n=20). The HR was measured using standard methods by the nurse and using the wearable device (Silmee Bar-type Lite sensor), and RR was measured by the nurse. The primary outcome was the mean difference in HR and RR between nonwearable devices and standard methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference in HR was -0.32 (SD 3.12) in study 1 and 0.04 (SD: 3.98) in study 2; both the differences were within the predefined accepted discrepancies (<5 beats/min). The mean difference in RR was -0.98 (SD 3.01) in study 1 and -0.49 (SD 2.40) in study 2; both the differences were within the predefined accepted discrepancies (3 breaths/min).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HR and RR measurements obtained using the nonwearable devices and the standard method were similar. Continuous monitoring of vital signs using nonwearable devices can aid in the early detection of abnormal conditions in older people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e56547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11479369/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/56547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:日本是世界上老龄化速度最快的社会,同时人口也在不断减少。因此,日本政府正在推动数字化转型和护理设备的使用,包括监测心率和呼吸频率的非穿戴式设备。然而,使用非穿戴式设备监测心率和呼吸频率的可行性以及所测心率和呼吸频率的一致性尚未见报道:在这项研究中,我们重点研究了许多养老院采用的片状非穿戴设备(安全羊传感器)。我们评估了使用非穿戴式设备连续监测心率(HR)和呼吸频率(RR)的可行性,以及所测心率和呼吸频率的一致性:方法:在每位参与者的床垫下放置一个床单型非穿戴设备,该设备每分钟通过身体振动测量一次心率和呼吸频率。研究 1 的受试者为 20-60 岁的健康人(21 人),研究 2 的受试者为居住在多户住宅中需要护理的老年人(20 人)。护士使用标准方法和可穿戴设备(Silmee Bar-type Lite 传感器)测量心率,护士测量心率。主要结果是非可穿戴设备与标准方法之间心率和心率的平均差异:结果:在研究 1 和研究 2 中,心率的平均差异分别为-0.32(标准差:3.12)和 0.04(标准差:3.98);这两个差异均在预定义的可接受差异范围内(结论:使用非可穿戴设备和标准方法测量的心率和心率的平均差异为-0.32(标准差:3.12)):使用非穿戴式设备和标准方法获得的心率和呼吸频率测量结果相似。使用非穿戴式设备对生命体征进行连续监测有助于及早发现老年人的异常状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of Monitoring Heart and Respiratory Rates Using Nonwearable Devices and Consistency of the Measured Parameters: Pilot Feasibility Study.

Background: As Japan is the world's fastest-aging society with a declining population, it is challenging to secure human resources for care providers. Therefore, the Japanese government is promoting digital transformation and the use of nursing care equipment, including nonwearable devices that monitor heart and respiratory rates. However, the feasibility of monitoring heart and respiratory rates with nonwearable devices and the consistency of the rates measured have not been reported.

Objective: In this study, we focused on a sheet-type nonwearable device (Safety Sheep Sensor) introduced in many nursing homes. We evaluated the feasibility of monitoring heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) continuously using nonwearable devices and the consistency of the HR and RR measured.

Methods: A sheet-type nonwearable device that measured HR and RR every minute through body vibrations was placed under the mattress of each participant. The participants in study 1 were healthy individuals aged 20-60 years (n=21), while those in study 2 were older adults living in multidwelling houses and required nursing care (n=20). The HR was measured using standard methods by the nurse and using the wearable device (Silmee Bar-type Lite sensor), and RR was measured by the nurse. The primary outcome was the mean difference in HR and RR between nonwearable devices and standard methods.

Results: The mean difference in HR was -0.32 (SD 3.12) in study 1 and 0.04 (SD: 3.98) in study 2; both the differences were within the predefined accepted discrepancies (<5 beats/min). The mean difference in RR was -0.98 (SD 3.01) in study 1 and -0.49 (SD 2.40) in study 2; both the differences were within the predefined accepted discrepancies (3 breaths/min).

Conclusions: HR and RR measurements obtained using the nonwearable devices and the standard method were similar. Continuous monitoring of vital signs using nonwearable devices can aid in the early detection of abnormal conditions in older people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信