美国、欧洲和印度仿制药评估和监管审批的比较分析。

Q4 Medicine
Bhoomi D Patel, Shailesh P Suthar, Arman M Mansuri, Vishvash D Joshi
{"title":"美国、欧洲和印度仿制药评估和监管审批的比较分析。","authors":"Bhoomi D Patel, Shailesh P Suthar, Arman M Mansuri, Vishvash D Joshi","doi":"10.62958/j.cjap.2024.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is used for the regulatory submission of generic drugs, which are pharmaceutical equivalents to brand-name drugs and distributed without patent protection. Different countries have their own regulatory requirements for the approval of generic drugs, enforced by authorities such as the CDSCO in India, EDQM in Europe, and USFDA in the United States. This review aims to compare the regulatory processes and requirements for generic drug approval in India, Europe, and the US, highlighting key differences and challenges. The involvement of regulatory authorities in the drug development process is crucial for expediting approval and addressing queries, helping to minimize delays. The Common Technical Document (CTD) format is employed across regions to harmonize submission requirements. This study underscores the differences in dossier submission for generics across the three regions, illustrating India's position in the global generic drug approval landscape. By comparing approval requirements, this work provides insight into the hurdles India must overcome to streamline its approval process. The ANDA allows generic manufacturers to submit bioequivalence studies, using the original innovator's safety and efficacy data. However, obtaining approval simultaneously from multiple regulatory authorities remains a challenging task. Careful review of regulatory documents by skilled personnel can reduce regulatory queries, ultimately accelerating the market launch of generic drugs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the generic drug approval process, emphasizing the need for harmonization and improved efficiency in India's regulatory framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":23985,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo ying yong sheng li xue za zhi = Zhongguo yingyong shenglixue zazhi = Chinese journal of applied physiology","volume":"40 ","pages":"e20240029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Generic Drug Assessment and Regulatory Approval in the USA, Europe and India.\",\"authors\":\"Bhoomi D Patel, Shailesh P Suthar, Arman M Mansuri, Vishvash D Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.62958/j.cjap.2024.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is used for the regulatory submission of generic drugs, which are pharmaceutical equivalents to brand-name drugs and distributed without patent protection. Different countries have their own regulatory requirements for the approval of generic drugs, enforced by authorities such as the CDSCO in India, EDQM in Europe, and USFDA in the United States. This review aims to compare the regulatory processes and requirements for generic drug approval in India, Europe, and the US, highlighting key differences and challenges. The involvement of regulatory authorities in the drug development process is crucial for expediting approval and addressing queries, helping to minimize delays. The Common Technical Document (CTD) format is employed across regions to harmonize submission requirements. This study underscores the differences in dossier submission for generics across the three regions, illustrating India's position in the global generic drug approval landscape. By comparing approval requirements, this work provides insight into the hurdles India must overcome to streamline its approval process. The ANDA allows generic manufacturers to submit bioequivalence studies, using the original innovator's safety and efficacy data. However, obtaining approval simultaneously from multiple regulatory authorities remains a challenging task. Careful review of regulatory documents by skilled personnel can reduce regulatory queries, ultimately accelerating the market launch of generic drugs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the generic drug approval process, emphasizing the need for harmonization and improved efficiency in India's regulatory framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhongguo ying yong sheng li xue za zhi = Zhongguo yingyong shenglixue zazhi = Chinese journal of applied physiology\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"e20240029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhongguo ying yong sheng li xue za zhi = Zhongguo yingyong shenglixue zazhi = Chinese journal of applied physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62958/j.cjap.2024.029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo ying yong sheng li xue za zhi = Zhongguo yingyong shenglixue zazhi = Chinese journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62958/j.cjap.2024.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简略新药申请(ANDA)用于向监管部门提交仿制药申请,仿制药是与品牌药等效的药品,在没有专利保护的情况下销售。不同国家对仿制药的审批有各自的监管要求,由印度 CDSCO、欧洲 EDQM 和美国 USFDA 等机构负责执行。本综述旨在比较印度、欧洲和美国仿制药审批的监管流程和要求,突出主要差异和挑战。监管机构参与药品开发过程对于加快审批和解决疑问至关重要,有助于最大限度地减少延误。各地区采用通用技术文件 (CTD) 格式来统一提交要求。本研究强调了三个地区在仿制药提交材料方面的差异,说明了印度在全球仿制药审批中的地位。通过比较审批要求,这项研究深入探讨了印度在简化审批流程方面必须克服的障碍。ANDA 允许仿制药生产商利用原始创新药的安全性和有效性数据提交生物等效性研究。然而,同时获得多个监管机构的批准仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。由熟练人员对监管文件进行仔细审查可以减少监管询问,最终加快仿制药的上市速度。本综述全面概述了仿制药的审批流程,强调了印度监管框架协调和提高效率的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of Generic Drug Assessment and Regulatory Approval in the USA, Europe and India.

The Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is used for the regulatory submission of generic drugs, which are pharmaceutical equivalents to brand-name drugs and distributed without patent protection. Different countries have their own regulatory requirements for the approval of generic drugs, enforced by authorities such as the CDSCO in India, EDQM in Europe, and USFDA in the United States. This review aims to compare the regulatory processes and requirements for generic drug approval in India, Europe, and the US, highlighting key differences and challenges. The involvement of regulatory authorities in the drug development process is crucial for expediting approval and addressing queries, helping to minimize delays. The Common Technical Document (CTD) format is employed across regions to harmonize submission requirements. This study underscores the differences in dossier submission for generics across the three regions, illustrating India's position in the global generic drug approval landscape. By comparing approval requirements, this work provides insight into the hurdles India must overcome to streamline its approval process. The ANDA allows generic manufacturers to submit bioequivalence studies, using the original innovator's safety and efficacy data. However, obtaining approval simultaneously from multiple regulatory authorities remains a challenging task. Careful review of regulatory documents by skilled personnel can reduce regulatory queries, ultimately accelerating the market launch of generic drugs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the generic drug approval process, emphasizing the need for harmonization and improved efficiency in India's regulatory framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信