{"title":"泌尿道异常或上尿路手术史对迷你ECIRS(内窥镜肾内联合手术)结果的影响。","authors":"Yosuke Shibata, Hiroki Ito, Tetsuo Fukuda, Fukashi Yamamichi, Takahiko Watanabe, Tadashi Tabei, Takaaki Inoue, Junichi Matsuzaki, Kazuki Kobayashi","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01638-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the impact of urinary tract anomalies or a history of upper urinary tract surgery (UTAS) on the minimally invasive endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mini-ECIRS) outcomes. Data from 1432 patients undergoing ECIRS for urolithiasis at three Japanese tertiary institutions between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed, with patients categorized into those with normal urinary tracts (non-UTAS) and those with UTAS (UTAS). We retrospectively examined the association between the UTAS and perioperative outcomes in mini-ECIRS. Of the 1096 cases in the final analysis, 1035 and 61 were identified as non-UTAS and UTAS, respectively. Stone-free rate (residual fragments > 2 mm, 62.8% vs. 62.7%), operation time (110.5 vs. 115.0 min), and hospital stay duration (5.6 vs. 5.7 days) showed no significant differences between non-UTAS and UTAS. The UTAS group demonstrated significantly higher rates of preoperative pyuria (86.2% vs. 71.1%), preoperative urinary tract infection (32.8% vs. 15.5%), preoperative stenting (52.5% vs. 31.0%), and preoperative nephrostomy (24.6% vs. 9.2%). However, the postoperative fever (26.3% vs. 25.0%) or septic shock (1.9% vs. 0%) were comparable between non-UTAS and UTAS. Stone burden and the number of calyces involved were significantly associated with a low stone-free rate (P < 0.001). Younger age, female sex, solitary stones, number of calyces involved, preoperative urinary tract infection, and absence of preoperative nephrostomy were identified as risk factors for perioperative complications. The UTAS was not associated with stone-free outcomes or perioperative complications. Mini-ECIRS demonstrated comparable stone-free outcomes and safety in patients with UTAS and those with normal urinary tracts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"52 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of urinary tract anomalies or history of upper urinary tract surgery on outcome of mini-ECIRS (endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery).\",\"authors\":\"Yosuke Shibata, Hiroki Ito, Tetsuo Fukuda, Fukashi Yamamichi, Takahiko Watanabe, Tadashi Tabei, Takaaki Inoue, Junichi Matsuzaki, Kazuki Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-024-01638-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assessed the impact of urinary tract anomalies or a history of upper urinary tract surgery (UTAS) on the minimally invasive endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mini-ECIRS) outcomes. Data from 1432 patients undergoing ECIRS for urolithiasis at three Japanese tertiary institutions between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed, with patients categorized into those with normal urinary tracts (non-UTAS) and those with UTAS (UTAS). We retrospectively examined the association between the UTAS and perioperative outcomes in mini-ECIRS. Of the 1096 cases in the final analysis, 1035 and 61 were identified as non-UTAS and UTAS, respectively. Stone-free rate (residual fragments > 2 mm, 62.8% vs. 62.7%), operation time (110.5 vs. 115.0 min), and hospital stay duration (5.6 vs. 5.7 days) showed no significant differences between non-UTAS and UTAS. The UTAS group demonstrated significantly higher rates of preoperative pyuria (86.2% vs. 71.1%), preoperative urinary tract infection (32.8% vs. 15.5%), preoperative stenting (52.5% vs. 31.0%), and preoperative nephrostomy (24.6% vs. 9.2%). However, the postoperative fever (26.3% vs. 25.0%) or septic shock (1.9% vs. 0%) were comparable between non-UTAS and UTAS. Stone burden and the number of calyces involved were significantly associated with a low stone-free rate (P < 0.001). Younger age, female sex, solitary stones, number of calyces involved, preoperative urinary tract infection, and absence of preoperative nephrostomy were identified as risk factors for perioperative complications. The UTAS was not associated with stone-free outcomes or perioperative complications. Mini-ECIRS demonstrated comparable stone-free outcomes and safety in patients with UTAS and those with normal urinary tracts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01638-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01638-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impacts of urinary tract anomalies or history of upper urinary tract surgery on outcome of mini-ECIRS (endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery).
This study assessed the impact of urinary tract anomalies or a history of upper urinary tract surgery (UTAS) on the minimally invasive endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mini-ECIRS) outcomes. Data from 1432 patients undergoing ECIRS for urolithiasis at three Japanese tertiary institutions between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed, with patients categorized into those with normal urinary tracts (non-UTAS) and those with UTAS (UTAS). We retrospectively examined the association between the UTAS and perioperative outcomes in mini-ECIRS. Of the 1096 cases in the final analysis, 1035 and 61 were identified as non-UTAS and UTAS, respectively. Stone-free rate (residual fragments > 2 mm, 62.8% vs. 62.7%), operation time (110.5 vs. 115.0 min), and hospital stay duration (5.6 vs. 5.7 days) showed no significant differences between non-UTAS and UTAS. The UTAS group demonstrated significantly higher rates of preoperative pyuria (86.2% vs. 71.1%), preoperative urinary tract infection (32.8% vs. 15.5%), preoperative stenting (52.5% vs. 31.0%), and preoperative nephrostomy (24.6% vs. 9.2%). However, the postoperative fever (26.3% vs. 25.0%) or septic shock (1.9% vs. 0%) were comparable between non-UTAS and UTAS. Stone burden and the number of calyces involved were significantly associated with a low stone-free rate (P < 0.001). Younger age, female sex, solitary stones, number of calyces involved, preoperative urinary tract infection, and absence of preoperative nephrostomy were identified as risk factors for perioperative complications. The UTAS was not associated with stone-free outcomes or perioperative complications. Mini-ECIRS demonstrated comparable stone-free outcomes and safety in patients with UTAS and those with normal urinary tracts.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society
The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field.
Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.