有糖果营销主题与无糖果营销主题的包装对风味电子烟的吸引力和感官属性的影响。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nikki S Jafarzadeh, Dae Hee Han, Natalia Peraza, Marissa K Anderson, Alyssa F Harlow, John R Monterosso, Raina D Pang, Tyler B Mason, Kurt Hong, Rael Cahn, Adam M Leventhal
{"title":"有糖果营销主题与无糖果营销主题的包装对风味电子烟的吸引力和感官属性的影响。","authors":"Nikki S Jafarzadeh, Dae Hee Han, Natalia Peraza, Marissa K Anderson, Alyssa F Harlow, John R Monterosso, Raina D Pang, Tyler B Mason, Kurt Hong, Rael Cahn, Adam M Leventhal","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>E-cigarettes with candy-themed marketing are implicated in decisions to first try e-cigarettes but have unknown effects on the experience of vaping. We compared adults' perceived appeal and sensory attributes after self-administering flavoured e-cigarettes in experimentally manipulated packaging with candy-themed versus standard marketing. We also assessed effect modification by salt vs free-base nicotine formulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults who currently used e-cigarettes and/or cigarettes (N=72; age M(SD)=31.4 (12.8) years) completed single-puff self-administrations from eight individually-packaged pods containing fruit or dessert-flavoured e-liquid via staff-guided video sessions. For each e-liquid flavour, we custom-manufactured packaging with standard (eg, 'mango'; mango fruit image) and candy (eg, 'mango gummy bear'; gummy bear image) marketing versions, which we varied within-subject (four pods candy; four pods standard). After participants opened the package and vaped the pod inside, they rated its sensory attributes and appeal (0-100 scale). Participants were randomised between subjects to salt or free-base ~2.3% nicotine in all pods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Marketing theme had no significant main effects on outcomes. Marketing theme × nicotine formulation interactions were significant; candy-themed (vs standard) packaging elevated composite appeal (B<sub>difference [estimated mean difference between marketing themes]</sub>=7.7), liking (B<sub>difference</sub>=8.4), and sweetness (B<sub>difference</sub>=5.7) ratings in free-base but not salt nicotine formulations. Marketing theme did not affect smoothness, harshness and bitterness ratings regardless of nicotine formulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Candy-themed marketing may heighten the appeal and sweet sensory experience of vaping flavoured free-base nicotine e-cigarettes. While marketing restrictions are predominantly intended to prevent e-cigarette initiation, candy-themed marketing restrictions could also prevent persistent use by lowering the appeal of flavoured free-base nicotine e-cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of packaging with versus without candy-oriented marketing themes on the appeal and sensory attributes of flavoured e-cigarettes.\",\"authors\":\"Nikki S Jafarzadeh, Dae Hee Han, Natalia Peraza, Marissa K Anderson, Alyssa F Harlow, John R Monterosso, Raina D Pang, Tyler B Mason, Kurt Hong, Rael Cahn, Adam M Leventhal\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tc-2024-058904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>E-cigarettes with candy-themed marketing are implicated in decisions to first try e-cigarettes but have unknown effects on the experience of vaping. We compared adults' perceived appeal and sensory attributes after self-administering flavoured e-cigarettes in experimentally manipulated packaging with candy-themed versus standard marketing. We also assessed effect modification by salt vs free-base nicotine formulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults who currently used e-cigarettes and/or cigarettes (N=72; age M(SD)=31.4 (12.8) years) completed single-puff self-administrations from eight individually-packaged pods containing fruit or dessert-flavoured e-liquid via staff-guided video sessions. For each e-liquid flavour, we custom-manufactured packaging with standard (eg, 'mango'; mango fruit image) and candy (eg, 'mango gummy bear'; gummy bear image) marketing versions, which we varied within-subject (four pods candy; four pods standard). After participants opened the package and vaped the pod inside, they rated its sensory attributes and appeal (0-100 scale). Participants were randomised between subjects to salt or free-base ~2.3% nicotine in all pods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Marketing theme had no significant main effects on outcomes. Marketing theme × nicotine formulation interactions were significant; candy-themed (vs standard) packaging elevated composite appeal (B<sub>difference [estimated mean difference between marketing themes]</sub>=7.7), liking (B<sub>difference</sub>=8.4), and sweetness (B<sub>difference</sub>=5.7) ratings in free-base but not salt nicotine formulations. Marketing theme did not affect smoothness, harshness and bitterness ratings regardless of nicotine formulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Candy-themed marketing may heighten the appeal and sweet sensory experience of vaping flavoured free-base nicotine e-cigarettes. While marketing restrictions are predominantly intended to prevent e-cigarette initiation, candy-themed marketing restrictions could also prevent persistent use by lowering the appeal of flavoured free-base nicotine e-cigarettes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058904\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义重大:糖果主题营销的电子烟与首次尝试电子烟的决定有关,但对吸食体验的影响尚不清楚。我们比较了成人自行吸食糖果主题包装与标准营销包装的风味电子烟后的感知吸引力和感官属性。我们还评估了盐基尼古丁与游离基尼古丁配方对效果的影响:目前使用电子烟和/或卷烟的成年人(人数=72;年龄M(SD)=31.4 (12.8)岁)通过工作人员指导的视频课程完成了单口自我吸食八种独立包装、含有水果或甜点口味电子烟液的烟弹。对于每种口味的电子液体,我们都定制了标准(如 "芒果";芒果水果形象)和糖果(如 "芒果小熊软糖";小熊软糖形象)两种营销版本的包装,并在受试者中加以变化(4 个糖果豆荚;4 个标准豆荚)。参与者打开包装并吸食里面的豆荚后,对其感官属性和吸引力进行评分(0-100 分)。受试者被随机分配到盐味或所有 pod 中尼古丁含量约为 2.3% 的自由碱味中:营销主题对结果没有明显的主要影响。营销主题×尼古丁配方的交互作用显著;糖果主题(与标准)包装提高了自由碱尼古丁配方的综合吸引力(Bdifference[营销主题之间的估计平均差]=7.7)、喜好度(Bdifference=8.4)和甜味(Bdifference=5.7),但盐尼古丁配方则没有。无论尼古丁配方如何,营销主题都不会影响顺滑度、刺鼻度和苦味的评分:结论:以糖果为主题的营销可能会增强吸食自由基尼古丁电子烟的吸引力和甜味感官体验。虽然营销限制的主要目的是防止吸食电子烟,但以糖果为主题的营销限制也可以通过降低自由基尼古丁电子烟的吸引力来防止持续吸食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of packaging with versus without candy-oriented marketing themes on the appeal and sensory attributes of flavoured e-cigarettes.

Significance: E-cigarettes with candy-themed marketing are implicated in decisions to first try e-cigarettes but have unknown effects on the experience of vaping. We compared adults' perceived appeal and sensory attributes after self-administering flavoured e-cigarettes in experimentally manipulated packaging with candy-themed versus standard marketing. We also assessed effect modification by salt vs free-base nicotine formulation.

Methods: Adults who currently used e-cigarettes and/or cigarettes (N=72; age M(SD)=31.4 (12.8) years) completed single-puff self-administrations from eight individually-packaged pods containing fruit or dessert-flavoured e-liquid via staff-guided video sessions. For each e-liquid flavour, we custom-manufactured packaging with standard (eg, 'mango'; mango fruit image) and candy (eg, 'mango gummy bear'; gummy bear image) marketing versions, which we varied within-subject (four pods candy; four pods standard). After participants opened the package and vaped the pod inside, they rated its sensory attributes and appeal (0-100 scale). Participants were randomised between subjects to salt or free-base ~2.3% nicotine in all pods.

Results: Marketing theme had no significant main effects on outcomes. Marketing theme × nicotine formulation interactions were significant; candy-themed (vs standard) packaging elevated composite appeal (Bdifference [estimated mean difference between marketing themes]=7.7), liking (Bdifference=8.4), and sweetness (Bdifference=5.7) ratings in free-base but not salt nicotine formulations. Marketing theme did not affect smoothness, harshness and bitterness ratings regardless of nicotine formulation.

Conclusion: Candy-themed marketing may heighten the appeal and sweet sensory experience of vaping flavoured free-base nicotine e-cigarettes. While marketing restrictions are predominantly intended to prevent e-cigarette initiation, candy-themed marketing restrictions could also prevent persistent use by lowering the appeal of flavoured free-base nicotine e-cigarettes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信