{"title":"风湿免疫科医生对实施类风湿关节炎非药物治疗的态度、实践和认知障碍:在线横断面调查。","authors":"Fatine Kronbi, Hanan Rkain, Samya Ez-Zaoui, Nada Benzine, Redouane Abouqal, Jihane Belayachi, Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni, Latifa Tahiri, Fadoua Allali","doi":"10.5114/reum/191792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate the integration level of non-pharmacological management (NPM) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), analyze attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers towards NPM implementation, and identify factors contributing to the underutilization of non-pharmacological treatment in RA.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among rheumatologists in Morocco. Rheumatologists received an online questionnaire gathering sociodemographic data, NPM integration level for RA, exploring their attitudes, practices and perceived barriers regarding the integration of NPM for RA, using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Univariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for under-integration of NPM for RA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 440 questionnaires sent, 132 rheumatologists responded to the survey (mean age of 44 ±12 years, 112 (84.8%) females, median professional experience of 15 years [4.7; 26.3]) with a response rate of 30%. All rheumatologists agreed on the importance of NPM integration into their practice with 130 (98.5%) supporting the necessity of tailored recommendations of NPM of RA for the Moroccan context. Sixty-nine (52.3%) reported a lack of NPM integration for RA. Only 36 (27.3%) consistently provided personalized NPM from RA diagnosis and 47 (35.6%) involved patients in decision-making. Comment perceived barriers included difficulties in organizing multidisciplinary care (122; 92.4%), difficulties with time management in consultation (119; 90.2%), and lack of multidisciplinary team members (116; 87.9%). In univariate analysis, lack of suitable training and lack of knowledge on NPM of RA were risk factors of under-integration of NPM of RA with respectively an odds ratio (OR) of 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.86 and OR of 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.76.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed significant insufficiencies in the integration of NPM of RA among Moroccan rheumatologists. Perceived barriers, including insufficient training, lack of knowledge, and infrastructural limitations, hinder effective implementation. Addressing these through tailored education and multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for improving RA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21312,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia","volume":"62 4","pages":"250-258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes, practices and perceived barriers toward implementing non-pharmacological management for rheumatoid arthritis among rheumatologists: an online cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Fatine Kronbi, Hanan Rkain, Samya Ez-Zaoui, Nada Benzine, Redouane Abouqal, Jihane Belayachi, Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni, Latifa Tahiri, Fadoua Allali\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/reum/191792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate the integration level of non-pharmacological management (NPM) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), analyze attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers towards NPM implementation, and identify factors contributing to the underutilization of non-pharmacological treatment in RA.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among rheumatologists in Morocco. Rheumatologists received an online questionnaire gathering sociodemographic data, NPM integration level for RA, exploring their attitudes, practices and perceived barriers regarding the integration of NPM for RA, using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Univariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for under-integration of NPM for RA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 440 questionnaires sent, 132 rheumatologists responded to the survey (mean age of 44 ±12 years, 112 (84.8%) females, median professional experience of 15 years [4.7; 26.3]) with a response rate of 30%. All rheumatologists agreed on the importance of NPM integration into their practice with 130 (98.5%) supporting the necessity of tailored recommendations of NPM of RA for the Moroccan context. Sixty-nine (52.3%) reported a lack of NPM integration for RA. Only 36 (27.3%) consistently provided personalized NPM from RA diagnosis and 47 (35.6%) involved patients in decision-making. Comment perceived barriers included difficulties in organizing multidisciplinary care (122; 92.4%), difficulties with time management in consultation (119; 90.2%), and lack of multidisciplinary team members (116; 87.9%). In univariate analysis, lack of suitable training and lack of knowledge on NPM of RA were risk factors of under-integration of NPM of RA with respectively an odds ratio (OR) of 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.86 and OR of 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.76.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed significant insufficiencies in the integration of NPM of RA among Moroccan rheumatologists. Perceived barriers, including insufficient training, lack of knowledge, and infrastructural limitations, hinder effective implementation. Addressing these through tailored education and multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for improving RA management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reumatologia\",\"volume\":\"62 4\",\"pages\":\"250-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/reum/191792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/reum/191792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:我们的研究旨在评估类风湿性关节炎(RA)非药物治疗(NPM)的整合水平,分析实施NPM的态度、实践和感知障碍,并确定导致RA非药物治疗利用不足的因素:在摩洛哥的风湿病学家中开展了一项描述性和分析性横断面研究。风湿病学家收到了一份在线调查问卷,该问卷收集了社会人口学数据、非药物疗法在 RA 中的应用水平,并采用 1-5 分的李克特量表探讨了他们对非药物疗法在 RA 中的应用所持的态度、做法和感知到的障碍。进行了单变量分析,以确定 RA 国家预防机制整合不足的风险因素:在发出的 440 份调查问卷中,132 名风湿免疫科医生(平均年龄为 44 ± 12 岁,112 名(84.8%)女性,专业经验中位数为 15 年 [4.7; 26.3])对调查做出了回复,回复率为 30%。所有风湿病学家都同意将国家预防机制纳入其临床实践的重要性,其中 130 名(98.5%)风湿病学家支持有必要根据摩洛哥的具体情况提出针对 RA 的国家预防机制建议。69名(52.3%)报告称缺乏针对 RA 的国家预防机制整合。只有 36 家医院(27.3%)坚持从 RA 诊断开始提供个性化的 NPM,47 家医院(35.6%)让患者参与决策。评论认为的障碍包括组织多学科护理的困难(122;92.4%)、会诊时间管理的困难(119;90.2%)以及缺乏多学科团队成员(116;87.9%)。在单变量分析中,缺乏适当的培训和缺乏有关 RA 非传染性疾病预防机制的知识是 RA 非传染性疾病预防机制整合不足的风险因素,其几率比(OR)分别为 0.09(95% CI:0.01-0.86)和 0.34(95% CI:0.15-0.76):我们的研究表明,摩洛哥风湿病学家在整合 RA 的国家预防机制方面存在严重不足。培训不足、知识缺乏和基础设施限制等认知障碍阻碍了有效实施。通过有针对性的教育和多学科合作来解决这些问题对于改善 RA 管理至关重要。
Attitudes, practices and perceived barriers toward implementing non-pharmacological management for rheumatoid arthritis among rheumatologists: an online cross-sectional survey.
Introduction: Our study aimed to evaluate the integration level of non-pharmacological management (NPM) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), analyze attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers towards NPM implementation, and identify factors contributing to the underutilization of non-pharmacological treatment in RA.
Material and methods: A descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among rheumatologists in Morocco. Rheumatologists received an online questionnaire gathering sociodemographic data, NPM integration level for RA, exploring their attitudes, practices and perceived barriers regarding the integration of NPM for RA, using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Univariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for under-integration of NPM for RA.
Results: Out of 440 questionnaires sent, 132 rheumatologists responded to the survey (mean age of 44 ±12 years, 112 (84.8%) females, median professional experience of 15 years [4.7; 26.3]) with a response rate of 30%. All rheumatologists agreed on the importance of NPM integration into their practice with 130 (98.5%) supporting the necessity of tailored recommendations of NPM of RA for the Moroccan context. Sixty-nine (52.3%) reported a lack of NPM integration for RA. Only 36 (27.3%) consistently provided personalized NPM from RA diagnosis and 47 (35.6%) involved patients in decision-making. Comment perceived barriers included difficulties in organizing multidisciplinary care (122; 92.4%), difficulties with time management in consultation (119; 90.2%), and lack of multidisciplinary team members (116; 87.9%). In univariate analysis, lack of suitable training and lack of knowledge on NPM of RA were risk factors of under-integration of NPM of RA with respectively an odds ratio (OR) of 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.86 and OR of 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.76.
Conclusions: Our study revealed significant insufficiencies in the integration of NPM of RA among Moroccan rheumatologists. Perceived barriers, including insufficient training, lack of knowledge, and infrastructural limitations, hinder effective implementation. Addressing these through tailored education and multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for improving RA management.