社会支持和心理资本对COVID-19大流行期间中国专业人员心理健康的人格影响具有中介作用。

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2024-10-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S475165
Yongcheng Yao, Jie Tang, Zhenzhen Li, Shuyan Chen, Haixia Du, Lingeng Lu
{"title":"社会支持和心理资本对COVID-19大流行期间中国专业人员心理健康的人格影响具有中介作用。","authors":"Yongcheng Yao, Jie Tang, Zhenzhen Li, Shuyan Chen, Haixia Du, Lingeng Lu","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S475165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>COVID-19-related lockdown can lead to mental health problem, which displays heterogeneous between individuals. The aim of this study was to explore the association between mental health, social support and psychological capital state of professional staff with different personalities during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-section study was conducted via online survey using the questionnaires of General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revision Short Scale of China (EPQ-RSC). A total of 626 employees were included. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of psychological capital, perceived social support, EPQ-N and EPQ-E and their interactions in general mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 2.7% of professionals had mental health. The married had a higher mental health score than the single (<i>P<</i>0.05). The regular exercising workers had the lowest mental health score (<i>P<</i>0.05), and higher psychological capital and social support scores than the non-exercising ones (<i>P<</i>0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that the interaction between social support, psychological capital and neuroticism was statistically significant (<i>β=-0</i>.161, <i>P<</i>0.001) in general mental health with neuroticism ranking the top (<i>β=</i>0.352, <i>P<</i>0.001). Mediation analysis showed that social support modified the effect of psychological capital on mental health, accounting for 25.5% of the total effect, and that both social support and psychological capital mediated the effect of neuroticism or extroversion differentially on mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neuroticism is an influencing factor on mental health of professional staff. Social support and psychological capital played a partial mediating role in the effect of neuroticism or extroversion differentially on mental health in China. The findings suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, more social support and psychological capital are needed for the professional individuals with neuroticism to alleviate their stress and improve mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"17 ","pages":"3443-3453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Support and Psychological Capital Mediate the Effect of Personalities on the Mental Health of Professional Staff in China During COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Yongcheng Yao, Jie Tang, Zhenzhen Li, Shuyan Chen, Haixia Du, Lingeng Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PRBM.S475165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>COVID-19-related lockdown can lead to mental health problem, which displays heterogeneous between individuals. The aim of this study was to explore the association between mental health, social support and psychological capital state of professional staff with different personalities during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-section study was conducted via online survey using the questionnaires of General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revision Short Scale of China (EPQ-RSC). A total of 626 employees were included. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of psychological capital, perceived social support, EPQ-N and EPQ-E and their interactions in general mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 2.7% of professionals had mental health. The married had a higher mental health score than the single (<i>P<</i>0.05). The regular exercising workers had the lowest mental health score (<i>P<</i>0.05), and higher psychological capital and social support scores than the non-exercising ones (<i>P<</i>0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that the interaction between social support, psychological capital and neuroticism was statistically significant (<i>β=-0</i>.161, <i>P<</i>0.001) in general mental health with neuroticism ranking the top (<i>β=</i>0.352, <i>P<</i>0.001). Mediation analysis showed that social support modified the effect of psychological capital on mental health, accounting for 25.5% of the total effect, and that both social support and psychological capital mediated the effect of neuroticism or extroversion differentially on mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neuroticism is an influencing factor on mental health of professional staff. Social support and psychological capital played a partial mediating role in the effect of neuroticism or extroversion differentially on mental health in China. The findings suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, more social support and psychological capital are needed for the professional individuals with neuroticism to alleviate their stress and improve mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"3443-3453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S475165\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S475165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与COVID-19相关的封锁会导致心理健康问题,而心理健康问题在个体间表现出差异性。本研究旨在探讨中国 COVID-19 大流行期间不同性格的专业人员的心理健康、社会支持和心理资本状态之间的关联:方法:本研究通过在线调查的方式,采用一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)、感知社会支持多维量表(MSPSS)、心理资本问卷(PCQ)、艾森克人格问卷-中国修订版简易量表(EPQ-RSC)等问卷进行横断面研究。共纳入 626 名员工。研究人员对心理资本、感知到的社会支持、EPQ-N和EPQ-E以及它们在一般心理健康中的相互作用进行了多元回归分析:结果:约 2.7%的专业人员有心理健康问题。已婚者的心理健康得分高于单身者(P0.05)。经常锻炼的工作人员的心理健康得分最低(P0.05),心理资本和社会支持得分高于不锻炼的工作人员(P0.01)。多变量分析表明,社会支持、心理资本和神经质之间的交互作用对一般心理健康有显著统计学意义(β=-0.161,P0.001),其中神经质居首位(β=0.352,P0.001)。中介分析表明,社会支持改变了心理资本对心理健康的影响,占总影响的 25.5%,社会支持和心理资本对神经质或外向性对心理健康的影响有不同的中介作用:结论:神经质是专业人员心理健康的一个影响因素。结论:神经质是影响中国专业人员心理健康的因素,社会支持和心理资本在神经质或外向性对心理健康的不同影响中发挥了部分中介作用。研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,神经质专业人员需要更多的社会支持和心理资本来缓解压力,改善心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Support and Psychological Capital Mediate the Effect of Personalities on the Mental Health of Professional Staff in China During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: COVID-19-related lockdown can lead to mental health problem, which displays heterogeneous between individuals. The aim of this study was to explore the association between mental health, social support and psychological capital state of professional staff with different personalities during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.

Methods: A cross-section study was conducted via online survey using the questionnaires of General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revision Short Scale of China (EPQ-RSC). A total of 626 employees were included. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of psychological capital, perceived social support, EPQ-N and EPQ-E and their interactions in general mental health.

Results: About 2.7% of professionals had mental health. The married had a higher mental health score than the single (P<0.05). The regular exercising workers had the lowest mental health score (P<0.05), and higher psychological capital and social support scores than the non-exercising ones (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that the interaction between social support, psychological capital and neuroticism was statistically significant (β=-0.161, P<0.001) in general mental health with neuroticism ranking the top (β=0.352, P<0.001). Mediation analysis showed that social support modified the effect of psychological capital on mental health, accounting for 25.5% of the total effect, and that both social support and psychological capital mediated the effect of neuroticism or extroversion differentially on mental health.

Conclusion: Neuroticism is an influencing factor on mental health of professional staff. Social support and psychological capital played a partial mediating role in the effect of neuroticism or extroversion differentially on mental health in China. The findings suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, more social support and psychological capital are needed for the professional individuals with neuroticism to alleviate their stress and improve mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信